• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: October 2011

Roy Blunt, footsoldier in the GOP class war

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

jobs, Jobs Thorugh Growth Act, missouri, Roy Blunt

FiredUp! recently posted a video of Senator Roy Blunt telling us that nothing would probably get done about jobs until after the election. This prediction, thanks to the obstructionism of Senator Blunt and his GOP congressional buddies, who saw fit to hold the line against the President’s jobs bill, is probably all too true.

Of course, freshman Senator Blunt, who may already be going after a GOP leadership position in the Senate, is not just guessing about what we’ll see – at least from the Republicans – in the coming months. Remember the jobs plan he was metaphorically waving around during his senatorial campaign? He claimed, falsely, that it had a hundred pages, but the gist can be summed up in a trio of brief phrases – cut taxes for the wealthy, cut social programs, and gut the regulations that protect the little guy from big business.

Now, back to the present. Yesterday, a few GOP pols, Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), John McCain (R-Ariz.), and Rand Paul (R-Ky.), gathered together the faithful media to announce the details of the “Jobs Through Growth Act,” a purported GOP jobs plan, an entity which up to now had been conspicuous only by its absence.  

Guess what? The “Jobs Through Growth Act” can also be summed up in a trio of brief phrases: cut taxes for the wealthy, cut social programs, and gut the regulations that protect the little guy from big business. It’s specifics, as reported by Steve Benen, include:

Cut taxes, approve a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution, eliminate the entirety of the Affordable Care Act, eliminate the entirety of Wall Street reform safeguards, blocking EPA enforcement of clean air measures, and a tax repatriation holiday for international corporations.

Isn’t this the same kind of stuff the GOP did during the eight years of the Bush regime? Shouldn’t we be trying to clean up the mess they created then, not adding to it? As Jonathan Chait observes:

There is zero chance that any independent agency or macroeconomic forecaster scores this proposal as either reducing the deficit or increasing employment over the next year. On the deficit, they may propose to cut tax rates, offset by spending cuts or closing tax deductions, but the latter will be totally unspecified. On jobs, the GOP simply will not engage with the premise of the entire macroeconomic forecasting field that the economy is suffering from a lack of demand. The purpose of this bill is to straddle that awkward divide, and provide a sound bite to answer Obama when he says he has a jobs plan.

I guess Blunt really does know what he’s talking about when he says there’ll be nothing done about jobs over the next months; he and his fellow GOPers, along with their corporate generals in the war on the middle class will see to that.

UPDATE:  In the video, Blunt hits the anti-regulation drum yet again, calling them, if I remember correctly, “job-strangling” regulations. CNN offers a few facts he ought to consider:

In the first two quarters of this year, only 2,085 new unemployment claims were attributed to government regulation, while 55,759 were tied to insufficient demand, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data on mass layoffs.

Furthermore, less than 20% of small business owners cite government regulations as their most important problem, according to a survey by the National Federation of Independent Business.

Poor sales, for example, were a much bigger worry.

   

Campaign Finance: HRCC – you've said it all

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, HRCC, Misouri Ethics Commission, missouri

Yesterday, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091068 10/13/2011 HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE INC Anheuser-Busch Cos Inc 1 Busch Place Saint Louis MO 63118 10/13/2011 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Why, that could pay for a lot of robocalls.

Look what the HRCC did in the past:

HRCC robocall in the 121st Legislative District: desperation and homophobia (October 27, 2010)

….

Female voice: This is an urgent alert for all Christian families. Before you vote you should know that state representative candidate Courtney Cole has taken hundreds in campaign donations from a representative of the hard core pornography industry, including gay pornography. By allowing her Democratic campaign to be funded by those who are involved with and support hard core pornography Courtney Cole clearly does not share our Christian family values. On election day stand up for what’s right and decent by voting no on Courtney Cole. Paid for by House Republican Campaign Committee, Inc.

….

You’ve got to wonder if any future robocalls will have a soundtrack.

Missouri Senate 2012: republicans will have all the money they need and spend it everywhere, part 2

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, ads, Claire McCaskill, John Brunner, missouri, Obama, Senate

An Internet ad for republican Senate candidate John Brunner running on the Great Orange Satan.

I’m betting the robocalls will be incessant.

Previously: Missouri Senate 2012: republicans will have all the money they need and spend it everywhere (October 12, 2011)

Campaign Finance: the 127th Legislative District race heats up

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

127th Legislative District, campaign finance, missouri, Tom Flanigan

Not really.

As if it was a really tough race in 2010:

Official Election Returns

State of Missouri General Election  – November 2, 2010 General Election

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

As announced by the Board of State Canvassers

on Tuesday, November 30, 2010

State Representative – District 127 – Summary

Precincts Reporting 18 of 18

Candidate Party Votes % of Votes

 Flanigan, Tom REP 10,006 100.0%

Total Votes   10,006

[emphasis added]

Okay, nothing to see here. Maybe there are a number of candidates who have filed to run in the 127th Legislative District in 2012:

A search for candidates in the 127th Legislative District at the Missouri Ethics Commission only turns up one committee.

Nope. Not yet.

Then why this, today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission?:

C061710 10/13/2011 COMMITTEE TO ELECT TOM FLANIGAN David and Debra Humphreys P O BOX 4050 Joplin MO 64803 Businessman 10/13/2011 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

That’s some serious money. There’s probably a recent history of raising big bucks, right? Wrong:

REPORT SUMMARY

COMMITTEE TO ELECT TOM FLANIGAN [pdf] 1/14/2011

1. Total Receipts For This Election Previously Reported $8,400.00

27. Money On Hand at the close of this reporting period $12,616.01

[emphasis added]

REPORT SUMMARY

COMMITTEE TO ELECT TOM FLANIGAN [pdf] 4/13/2011

1. Total Receipts For This Election Previously Reported $0.00

27. Money On Hand at the close of this reporting period $10,396.67

[emphasis added]

REPORT SUMMARY

COMMITTEE TO ELECT TOM FLANIGAN [pdf] 7/11/2011

2. All Monetary Contributions Received This Period $3,800.00

27. Money On Hand at the close of this reporting period $12,689.75

[emphasis added]

What’s the need for a $25,000.00 campaign contribution? Why now? That’s in the same league as statewide candidates. Or, in the 127th Legislative District, that comes to approximately $2.50 a vote in 2010 dollars.  

Thoughts on the Occupy phenomenom

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

financial regulation, missouri, Money in Politics, Occupy Joplin, Occupy Pittsburg, Occupy Springfield, Occupy Wall Street, OccupySTL

Tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. there’ll be a labor solidarity march with OccupySTL which will be held in Kiener plaza; according to what I’ve heard, numerous progressive groups will be represented there. It should be big, so be there, as the saying goes, or be square (note: honesty compells me to admit that I will be unable to attend, hence square).

It’s not surprising that folks are rushing to join the 99% – it seems to be a movement whose time has come.  After two years of listening to the Tea Party dead-enders claim the mantle of “We the people,” while providing cover to a GOP intent on gutting our hard-won American social contract, a real populist alternative is actually overdue.  The Occupy movement just might be that alternative – it certainly seems to be taking off. Polls released today show that Americans favor Occupy Wall Street by a two-to-one margin. Even more revealing, only 28% of those polled have a favorable opinion of the Tea Party.

And everybody wants in. Just consider that even Pittsburg, Kansas (population ca. 20,000, located in a hard-core, hard-bitten, red zone), has its own Occupy Pittsburg demonstrators. In Missouri, there’s Occupy Joplin, Occupy Springfield. You name it, seems like somebody’s occupying it.  And this in spite of the fact, as per Matt Taibbi, that it isn’t an intrinsically easy sell:

… it’s extremely difficult to explain the crimes of the modern financial elite in a simple visual. The essence of this particular sort of oligarchic power is its complexity and day-to-day invisibility: Its worst crimes, from bribery and insider trading and market manipulation, to backroom dominance of government and the usurping of the regulatory structure from within, simply can’t be seen by the public or put on TV. There just isn’t going to be an iconic “Running Girl” photo with Goldman Sachs, Citigroup or Bank of America – just 62 million Americans with zero or negative net worth, scratching their heads and wondering where the hell all their money went and why their votes seem to count less and less each and every year.

Taibbi suggests that the generalized focus on financial malfeasance and government corruption rather than on specific demands has been a good strategy that has enabled the movement “to build numbers and stay in the fight.” He adds, though, that the time will come when greater specificity will be necessary, and to that end he offers what he characterizes as an example of a “short but powerful list of demands” – read it and see what you think.

From my perspective – which loses some legitimacy since I’m not out on the streets with the demonstrators – I think Taibbi is totally correct when he suggests that the Occupy movement’s goals should be few in number, and focused on the financial malfeasance that got us in this situation – although, to my mind, his suggestions may be almost too specific, and he fails to mention the most important aspect of that malfeasance, which is the role of money in government (although he does suggest that companies that receive bailout money not be permitted to lobby politicians). As long as Wall Street and big business can purchase politicians, nothing will change.

Campaign Finance: Jason Kander (D) continues…part 3

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, Jason Kander, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Secretary of State

Yesterday, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C071012 10/12/2011 FRIENDS OF JASON KANDER Jeffrey Fort 5 Dromara Road St Louis MO 63124 Self Business Investor 10/12/2011 $5,300.00

[emphasis added]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Jason Kander (D) continues…part 2 (October 7, 2011)

Secretary of State: Bekki Cook (D) endorses Jason Kander (D) (October 5, 2011)

Campaign Finance: Jason Kander (D) continues… (October 3, 2011)

Campaign Finance: on the last day of the quarter (September 30, 2011)

Secretary of State: Robin Carnahan (D) won’t run for reelection, Jason Kander (D) announces (September 30, 2011)

A total of $80,406.00 since September 30th. And that’s just the big dollar contributions (over $5000.00) that must be reported within 48 hours.

The Devolution of Civilization

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

education, jobs, republicans, right wingnuttia

That was then:

John Adams to Abigail Adams, [post 12 May 1780]

Adams Family Correspondence, 3:342

“I must study Politicks and War that my sons may have liberty to study Mathematicks and Philosophy. My sons ought to study Mathematicks and Philosophy, Geography, natural History, Naval Architecture, navigation, Commerce and Agriculture, in order to give their Children a right to study Painting, Poetry, Musick, Architecture, Statuary, Tapestry and Porcelaine.”

This is now:

October 12, 2011 03:38 PM

Scapegoating the Liberal Arts

by Daniel Luzer

Too many students are getting useless degrees, complains the governor of Florida, Rick Scott, who argues that what Florida needs is more students with “practical” majors. This advice seems realistic, but it’s actually based on nothing but a myth stemming from some weird assumptions about the evils of the liberal arts….

….This is a very odd way to look at economics. Encouraging people to study science and engineering is commendable, but when you’re talking about this only in terms of helping people get jobs, this is all just ridiculous. People don’t go to college to get jobs; they go to college to get an education. No one has ever demonstrated that students can’t get jobs because they studied the wrong things. That’s because this isn’t true….

….Most employers say they just want applicants who can work hard and think critically. And that’s exactly what the liberal arts help students do very well.

So that their descendants can dwell in corporate cubicles or work for minimum wage with no benefits at an anti-union national chain store.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): What color is the sky in my world?

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, missouri, Vicky Hartzler

The spin:

@RepHartzler Rep. Vicky Hartzler

The Senate defeated the President’s Jobs Plan which shows even Democrats know it won’t create jobs. They need to embrace our plan! 11 hours ago

The reality:

YEAs —50

[….]

NAYs —49

Alexander (R-TN)

Ayotte (R-NH)

Barrasso (R-WY)

Blunt (R-MO)

Boozman (R-AR)

Brown (R-MA)

Burr (R-NC)

Chambliss (R-GA)

Coats (R-IN)

Cochran (R-MS)

Collins (R-ME)

Corker (R-TN)

Cornyn (R-TX)

Crapo (R-ID)

DeMint (R-SC)

Enzi (R-WY)

Graham (R-SC)

Grassley (R-IA)

Hatch (R-UT)

Heller (R-NV)

Hoeven (R-ND)

Hutchison (R-TX)

Inhofe (R-OK)

Isakson (R-GA)

Johanns (R-NE)

Johnson (R-WI)

Kirk (R-IL)

Kyl (R-AZ)

Lee (R-UT)

Lugar (R-IN)

McCain (R-AZ)

McConnell (R-KY)

Moran (R-KS)

Murkowski (R-AK)

Nelson (D-NE)

Paul (R-KY)

Portman (R-OH)

Reid (D-NV)

Risch (R-ID)

Roberts (R-KS)

Rubio (R-FL)

Sessions (R-AL)

Shelby (R-AL)

Snowe (R-ME)

Tester (D-MT)

Thune (R-SD)

Toomey (R-PA)

Vitter (R-LA)

Wicker (R-MS)

[emphasis added]

Majority Leader Reid (D) switched his vote to no in a procedural move which will allow for reconsideration.  

Sen. Claire McCaskill(D): yes on jobs; Sen. Roy Blunt (r): no on jobs

….Yep, that’s right, republicans use their arcane Senate rules to stop a discussion that a majority of senators want to have. It’s not like the Senate has been burning the candle at both ends and there’s no time to fit it in.

What do most Americans think of the American Jobs Act of 2011?:

NBC/WSJ poll: Despite defeat, Obama’s jobs bill is popular

….But when the legislation’s details are included in a follow-up question — that it would cut payroll taxes, fund new road construction, extend unemployment benefits, and that it would be paid for by increasing taxes on the wealthy — 63 percent say they favor the bill and 32 percent oppose it.

What’s more, 64 percent of respondents agree with the statement that it is a “good idea” to raise taxes on the wealthy and corporations, because they should pay their fair share and can afford to pay more to help fund programs and government operations.

By comparison, 31 percent agree with the statement that raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations is a “bad idea,” because higher taxes take away money that would otherwise be invested to help grow the economy….

[emphasis added]

Evidently the color of that sky is self interest.

Missouri Senate 2012: republicans will have all the money they need and spend it everywhere

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, ads, Claire McCaskill, John Brunner, missouri, Obama, Senate

An Internet ad for republican Senate candidate John Brunner.

There’s nothing new under the sun. Especially from Missouri republicans.

Chipping away at reproductive freedom … the war on women chugs along

12 Wednesday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, missouri, reproductive freedom, women's rights

In late September there was an article in the New York Times  detailing efforts to chip away at women’s reproductive freedom:

Thirty-eight years after Roe v. Wade recognized a woman’s right to make her own childbearing decisions and legalized abortion nationwide, a newly intensified drive by anti-abortion forces who refuse to accept the law of the land has seriously imperiled women’s ability to exercise that right. Opponents of abortion rights know they cannot achieve their ultimate goal of an outright ban, at least in the near future. So they are concentrating on enacting laws and regulations narrowing the legal right and making abortion more difficult to obtain.

The article included a map that shows how many of five particularly onerous restrictions have been imposed on women in each state. Missouri is among the fifteen states that have enacted all five of these restrictions. In fact, Missouri is probably the poster child (poster state?) for those who want to know how to go about undoing women’s reproductive freedom step by onerous step.

According to the Missouri NARAL Webpage, the state has meddled in what should be private medical decisions made by a woman and her doctor by banning specific, medically sound procedures; forcing medically unnecessary delays in delivering abortion services; restricting the use of public funds to provide information about abortion options, including genetic counseling about possible birth defects; forbidding the use of public facilities to provide abortions and banning public employees from providing or assisting in abortions; permitting private individuals, physicians, nurses, midwives, or hospitals to refuse to provide abortion services literally at will, and allowing private employers to refuse to provide insurance coverage for such services; refusing to pay for abortion services for poor women who are eligible for state health assistance, thus restricting their ability to secure an abortion; prohibiting women under 18 from getting abortions without parental consent; hobbling abortion providers with requirements that are not imposed on any other health care providers; and mandating that women seeking an abortion receive propaganda presenting the belief that “abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being” as a fact.

An almost exhausting list, each item of which has the potential to limit the right of Missouri women to secure a legal, safe medical procedure. But there’s more. The state code contains this loaded provision:

The general assembly of this state finds that: (1) The life of each human being begins at conception; (2) Unborn children have protectable interests in life, health, and well-being; . . . [and,] The laws of this state shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development, all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state . . . .

Interesting how a bunch penny ante pols feel qualified to step in and adjudicate a question about which both religious and secular ethicists have failed to reach consensus. I hope you’re as confounded as I am at the arrogance that permits these folks to decide that a human life in the process of formation is as or more important than that of the fully-developed human life that sustains it, and, further, that their opinion that this is so trumps the unique physical, mental or social conditions that may lead women to terminate a pregnancy.

I also hope you realize that this is just the tip of the iceberg in what amounts to a war on female sexual autonomy that is being fought on multiple fronts, and which is making frightening – and often lethal – inroads on the equal status of women in this country. Consider:

— Attempts to limit funding to organizations like Planned Parenthood, most recently in Indiana, would not only penalize abortion, but would limit access to contraception, contraception counseling, cancer, HIV and other STI screening for low-income women, reflecting the “do the deed, we’ll make damm sure you pay the price”  mentality of so many on the religious right.

— House Republicans in Washington have introduced a bill that would allow hospitals to refuse to perform an abortion even when it is essential to save the woman’s life. This would affect the ability of women to receive vital care at, at a minimum, 600 Catholic hospitals countrywide.

— Who can forget the GOP anti-abortion pander late last year when they tried to redefine rape for purposes of securing an abortion? Remember – no bruises, no broken bones, no rape?

Finally, just to make it crystal clear that women are very, very low on the pro-life, right-wing totem pole, Topeka, the capital city of Kansas, which under Governor Brownbeck is a bastion of the anti-woman, pro-fetal life contingent, has decided that it is just too expensive to enforce statutes that protect women against domestic violence and have decided to decriminalize such acts. Already 18 abusers – men who have physically assaulted a member of their family – have been released from jail because the city refused to press charges.

Need one say more?  

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Cass County Democrats – Back to Blue Dinner – Belton, Missouri – April 25, 2026
  • About that ratio
  • “Show me your papers. Pull down your pants.”
  • Never met a Fascist conspiracy theory he didn’t like
  • Cymbal clapper

Recent Comments

Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…
What good is the 25t… on We are the only people on the…

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,042,973 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...