• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: August 2010

Because the people who are supposed to throw the punches are too busy hiding…

28 Saturday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

grassroots, message, Open Left, Republican Deregulation

….I’m tired of working for candidates who make me think that I should be embarrassed to believe what I believe […] I’m tired of getting them elected. We all need some therapy, because somebody came along and said, liberal means soft on crime, soft on drugs, soft on Communism, soft on defense, and we’re gonna tax you back to the Stone Age because people shouldn’t have to go to work if they don’t want to. And instead of saying, well, excuse me, you right-wing, reactionary, xenophobic, homophobic, anti-education, anti-choice, pro-gun, Leave It To Beaver trip back to the Fifties, we cowered in the corner, and said, Please. Don’t. Hurt. Me. No more….

“Gone Quiet” – The West Wing (2001)

From a diary at Open Left:

dubya: …reducing regulation…

Angry guy who yells at kids to keep off his lawn: …and less regulation [emphatic gesture]…

Cable talking head: …just decontrol, deregulate…

Former half-term governor: …Yeah, absolutely…

Announcer: It’s a long held republican belief that the laws, rules that govern Wall Street greed are not needed. Oil companies, corporations can police themselves. So they blew up the rules and…

The successor to Duncan the Wonder Horse: …in this ongoing financial crises…

Breathless cable news voice number one: …in the blink of an eye…

Breathless cable news voice number two: …freaked out waiting to see how low the Dow will go…

The successor to Duncan the Wonder Horse: …demoralizing news from the Gulf…

Matter of fact broadcast voice: …with their entire beachfront covered in oil…

Announcer: Yet even after their failed policies and their greed decimated America, if one criticizes these corporations, they say…

Delusional teabagger candidate: …I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of BP…

Announcer: Or even if you insist BP pays for the cleanup…

Water Oil carrier for big oil: …what I would characterize as a twenty billion dollar shakedown, so I apologize…

Announcer: An economic crises and the largest environmental disaster ever caused by republican deregulation, and they’re apologizing to BP for the bill. The republican party, putting corporations and the rich before the rest of us, putting profits before people, and still believe…

Spokesperson role could be played by any one of a large number of republican hacks: …we need to go back to the exact same agenda…

Yep, it takes the grassroots to actually throw any effective punches.

“…we cowered in the corner, and said, Please. Don’t. Hurt. Me. No more…”

Sharia law or Christian Theocracy: six of one, a half-dozen of the other

27 Friday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cynthia Davis, David Barton, Gina Loudon, missouri, Sharia law, Todd Akin

Thanks to St. Louis Activitist Hub, I got my first real introduction to the strange mixture of hysteria and ignorance that is Dr. Gina Loudon, local Tea Party luminary. Adam at the Hub was having a little fun with her over the top spiel about the Burlington Coat Factory Muslim community center (known on Fox News as the Ground-Zero mosque), which she compared to a Nazi war memorial in the center of London. Enough said. What struck me, though, was Loudon’s evocation of a tenet of “Sharia law”* to justify her bigotry.

Sharia law seems to have become one of the concepts that gets wingers salivating right now. Oklahomans will vote this November, for instance, on whether or not to ban Sharia law – in spite of the fact that there is not even the slightest indication that anyone would ever try to impose Sharia in Oklahoma.

Closer to home, winger William Teach wonders why those who have a problem with the religous overtones of Missouri’s most recent anti-abortion legislation aren’t fighting Sharia law instead. The fact that right-wing Christians rather than Muslims have a stranglehold on the Missouri legislature doesn’t seem to strike him as germane to the topic.  

Nevertheless, Teach’s emphasis on religious law is suggestive. If you go to Loudon’s Webpage, you will find, immediately following the mosque harangue, a post titled “A Call to Christians,” the burden of which is the need to get Christians energized to take back the country.

Now, I’m not too keen on Sharia law, but neither am I keen on Christian theocracy. While I have no evidence that Muslims in the U.S. want to impose Sharia, there’s lots of evidence that many in the Christian-leaning right-wing here in Missouri would just love, as Loudon suggests, to take back the country and stick me with their version of biblical law.

Consider Cynthia Davis, dogged purveyor of Christian Nation legislation.  Davis takes her cues from people like David Barton, revisionist pseudo-historian and founder of the Wallbuilders, a group dedicated to establishing a Christian nation – or as Barton would prefer, returning the nation to its Christian roots.

*Photo of Cynthia Davis and David Barton

And who could forget Todd Akin – who carried the Barton banner into battle to retain “under God” in the pledge of allegiance? If you doubt his Christian Nation credentials, just listen to his discussion of the topic at last year’s prayercast against Health Care Reform (beginning at 49:45):

http://www.frcaction.org/player.swf

To summarize the highlights, Akin is unequivocal that the Bible provides:

“… a blueprint for all of mankind … a blueprint to tell us abut the economy, to tell us about education, to tell us about government … an entire blueprint for how civilization can be structured.”

Akin, is of course, limited in his role in the U.S. House – he seems to spend lots of time on mostly symbolic gestures. Davis and her ilk, however, are apparently able to lead the Missouri legislature around by a ring in the nose – even our Democratic governor, Jay Nixon, doesn’t dare veto her Christian-inspired abortion legislation. So while, I don’t see Sharia law hiding over the horizon, the proponents of a particular, narrow brand of Christian law seem to stand a much better chance of success.

* Loudon is quoted on the St. Louis Activist Hub as saying: “They are using the Sharia law concept of lying in the best interest of Allah … .” Her Webpage now reads: “They are using the concept of taqiyya (lying) in the best interest of Islam … .” Unfortunately, that is not exactly what taqiyya means. It is a Sharia tenet that allows Muslims to conceal their faith when under threat and its use is carefully circumscribed.

The stimulus? What a waste of good money…

27 Friday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Daily Star-Journal, hospital, missouri, stimulus, Warresnburg

Western Missouri Medical Center in Warrensburg, Missouri is expanding and remodeling its facilities.

In yesterday’s Warrensburg Daily Star-Journal:

…American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds play a key role in the $54 million construction project at Western Missouri Medical Center, a USDA representative said Wednesday.

“If not for the stimulus funds, we probably wouldn’t be in this room today,” USDA State Rural Development Director Anita “Janie” Dunning said.

Without stimulus money, Gregory said, the USDA could not have loaned the hospital $34 million…

It’s the only hospital in the county – the nearest hospital after that is at least thirty miles away.

The punch line? A republican state senator was quoted in the same article:

…Sen. David Pearce said, “We’ve all invested in this hospital and believe in it.”

Wait, doesn’t the Missouri republican playbook dictate that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is pure evil? Just asking.

KY3/MSU Poll – August 2010: Carnahan (D) and Blunt (r) are tied

27 Friday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2010, KY3/MSU, missouri, poll, Robin Carnahan, Roy Blunt, Senate

This evening KY3/MSU released a poll of 785 people taken statewide. The online report did not indicate the date(s) of the interviews, the margin of error for the full sample, or the voter screen. The results were weighted. The results do indicated the margin of error for the three congressional race subsamples.

The poll shows that Robin Carnahan (D) and Roy Blunt (r-lobbyists) are tied:

…If the 2010 election for U.S. Senate from Missouri were held today, would you vote for Robin Carnahan, the Democrat, or Roy Blunt, the Republican?

Robin Carnahan – 48.4%

Roy Blunt – 48.8%

Other – 2.8%

The formula to calculate the margin of error (95% confidence level) is 1.96 x the square root of the multiplied percentages of each candidate which has been divided by the total sample.

1.96 x square root ((Carnahan x Blunt)/785)

For our purposes here we’ll call ’em even at 50% each. That’s a 3.5% margin of error (3.497%, if you don’t want to round to one decimal place).

A commenter responding to questions about the poll added the following:

….Margin of error is +/-3.5 and although there were more female respondents, the data was weighted appropriately to compensate.

[….]

Since the poll was conducted with Random Digit Dialing. Since most younger people use only cell phones (cell numbers are not included in this type of poll) there are more older respondents. Again, though, the data is weighted to compensate. The poll results gained from this sample can be generalized to the larger state population with a 95% confidence level….

It’d be nice to know the interview screen – adult, registered voter, or likely voter – and the period of time in which the interviews took place.

Dogs can't vote, but you can

27 Friday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Center for Consumer Freedom, Missourians for the Protection of Dogs, Prop B, Puppy mills

Thanks for posting the list of contributors to Missourians for the Protection of Dogs.  That is very encouraging. I don’t know if MPD has tried to raise big bucks in Missouri or not.  Individuals can contribute on their website.

MPD lists 5901 supporters so far as well as 113 veterinarians and clinics.  Among the 108 animal protection charities that are helping this effort, four of them are part of the coalition actively working on passing Prop B in November.  They are ASPCA, Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation, Missouri Humane Society and Humane Society of the US.

MPD also has a list of their opponents on their

“sick puppies” page. The Missouri Federation of Animal Owners was formed in 2009 specifically to block the right of citizens of Missouri to voice their opinion on the inhumane conditions in massive breeding facilities.  Some of the worst offenders are listed, along with the citations and fines against them for their heartless treatment of innocent and caged dogs.

I wrote about the national effort front groups such as Center for Consumer Freedom several months ago on this blog.  

Keep in mind, the rather minimal standards required by Prop B will apply only to breeders with 10 or more female dogs, and breeders will be limited to no more than 50 females actively producing puppies for sale.  Small breeders, especially family or hobby breeders who keep a small number of dogs will not be affected.

Reputable breeders already meet or exceed the basic requirements of shelter, food, water, space to move around and a rest between pregnancies.

With the highest number of puppy mills in the nation (over 3,000 separate operations) Missouri is known as the puppy mill capital of the U.S.  It took the HSUS over 10 years to make cock fighting illegal in Missouri.  Let’s hope it doesn’t take that long to rescue some of these pitiful creatures from their misery.  

Why does Jo Ann Emerson (r) want to increase the federal deficit?

27 Friday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

8th Congressional District, Deficit, health care reform, Jo Ann Emerson, missouri, repeal, Tommy Sowers

Just asking.

Jo Ann Emerson (r), the incumbent in the 8th Congressional District, is running an ad attacking challenger Tommy Sowers (D) for his support of health care reform.

…Jo Ann Emerson fought the health care bill…

[Jo Ann Emerson Fought Obamacare]

…and is working for repeal…

[emphasis added]

That’s interesting.

On August 24th the Congressional Budget Office responded by letter [pdf] to a request for information from Senator Mike Crapo (R) concerning the effect on the deficit if health care reform legislation were to be repealed.

Their answer? Repealing health care reform legislation would increase the deficit by $455 billion:

…Health Care Savings under PPACA and the Reconciliation Act

Finally, you asked what the net deficit impact would be if certain provisions of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act that were estimated to generate net savings were eliminated specifically, those which were originally estimated to generate a net reduction in mandatory outlays of $455 billion over the 2010-2019 period. The estimate of $455 billion mentioned in your letter represents the net effects of many provisions. Some of those provisions generated savings for Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and some generated costs. If those provisions were repealed, CBO estimates that there would be an increase in deficits similar to its original estimate of $455 billion in net savings over that period.

[page]

CBO’s earlier estimate was based on the forecasts of economic conditions, health care spending, and other technical factors that CBO published in 2009. Since that time, CBO has prepared new baseline projections consistent with updated economic and technical information, and has also extended its baseline to include 2020. We have not updated the estimate of health-related savings reported in March, but CBO has no reason to believe that such an estimate would differ substantially from the original one.

I hope you find this information helpful…

“…I hope you find this information helpful…

Uh, I don’t think any republicans will. Just guessing. Do you think Jo Ann Emerson (r) will change her campaign ad? The answer to that is probably no. After all, republicans are getting a lot of mileage out of noise and distortion. Why should Jo Ann Emerson (r) be any different?

Leveraging energy-equity for the Midwestern marketplace through PACE financing

26 Thursday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Creating a comprehensive, robust, and progressive energy portfolio for America is critical to help lead our nation out of recession and into a prosperous future.

We have to begin to focus our national resources on this necessary transformation — the rest of the world is not waiting. China has announced it will invest 5 trillion yuan (nearly $740 billion) over the next 10 years into renewable energy projects, positioning itself as the global clean energy leader. Squandering America’s wealth on distracting nation-building phantoms in Iraq and Afghanistan, while we are left behind in regard to clean energy, is not smart, nor wise. After all, these technological innovations in energy will comprise the future bulwark of how we power our socities, civilization, and world. It’s time to direct some of our amazing capacity to create dangerous things, toward building a more sustainable, cleaner and safer civilization.

Last June, I was invited by Roger Walker, Chair of REGFORM, to speak at the 2010 Midwest Energy & Climate Policy Conference on a key aspect concerning the advancement of our energy sector, namely, energy efficiency and renewable energy property improvements for homes, offices and buildings. Through that event I was interviewed by Jeffrey Tomich of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch covering some pushback from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac on PACE financing. States and municipalities are suing Fannie and Freddie over their disapproval of PACE having a ‘senior lien status’ above the home’s primary mortgage. Recently, I’ve been asked to make my presentation from the energy conference available. Here it is in an abridged form per Examiner’s posting guidelines. ~BD

“Leveraging Energy-Equity for the Midwestern marketplace”

Hello, my name’s Byron DeLear, Chair of Energy Equity Funding, LLC. I want to thank Roger Walker and REGFORM for giving us the opportunity to share some exciting new programs and projects with the goal of increasing energy efficiency in Missouri, creating thousands of new jobs–jobs that are “insulated” from outsourcing–and heading us the down the road towards the destination of transforming fundamentally the way we use energy in America. Smarter, cleaner, more sustainable.

A dear friend of mine, Glenn, a UAW worker, lost his job as the economy tanked. In the last 36 months, tens of thousands of folks got laid off in Missouri as Ford and Chrysler plants shut down, other local storefronts downsized or closed up shop for good. Nationally, millions of Americans have lost their jobs. The building and construction trades have fared particularly worse than other sectors. For example, in Missouri, total jobs lost was nearly 5%, while the construction trades lost four times as much, 20%.

This panel is about financing clean energy projects, leveraging public and private resources to overcome barriers to these investments, reducing Green House Gas emissions, and creating jobs. For me, clean energy, energy efficiency, renewables, is not just about investment and job creation, but rather, bringing and building an entirely new industry to the Midwest and America. As this new economic landscape shifts rapidly, a myriad of overlapping standards, programs, grants and legislation have sometimes made it confusing for the small business entrepreneur who is just trying to get his green venture off the ground.

Last year, the Missouri Association of Accredited Energy Professionals (MAAEP) formed, one of the country’s first statewide trade associations for energy auditors and home performance contractors. MAAEP started organizing small business owners across the state that make up the majority of vendors in this new industry. In collaboration with individual Realtors, MAAEP has developed a market driven model for promoting energy efficiency, in addition to distinguishing and singling out those properties that have been improved by providing a energy efficient home certification.

It was clear, that in the interests of protecting industry best standards, practices, and providing consumer satisfaction, an “auditor-centric” approach was the best way to guarantee results and maximize return on investment for the homeowner and the community as a whole.

The innovative clean energy funding mechanism, Property Assessed Clean Energy or “PACE”, has been recently named one of Harvard Business Review’s ten breakthrough ideas of 2010 and Scientific American’s top 20 ideas that can ‘change the world’. PACE is a new funding model that allows local governments to partner with property owners to achieve savings on energy costs through energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements. Passing PACE legislation in Missouri was no small feat, and its success can be attributed to the efforts of a broad coalition of business and environmental stakeholders. In other states, PACE didn’t pass due to opposition from industry sectors that, in Missouri, backed it and helped push the legislation through.

Currently, in the Midwest, three states have passed PACE enabling legislation: Oklahoma, Illinois and Missouri.

Big Picture on Energy Efficiency for Missouri

• Job Creation and Economic Stimulus.

– 10,000-15,000 green jobs in 10-15 year period for Missouri that can’t be outsourced. More than 5 Billion Dollars of Economic Activity with only 35% Market Penetration (approx. 840,000 residential properties improved over 10-15 year period, 2000 Census figures averaging $9K per energy retrofit / renewable energy contract.)

– 90% of materials used in energy efficiency retrofits manufactured in the USA

– Increasing energy independence acts as local economic stimulus by saving money on energy importation

Gateway to a New Economy

The Midwest has played a pivotal role for many national initiatives over the years. The Lewis and Clark Expedition to discover a means to traverse our continent and reach the Pacific Ocean, or some of the first pavement for Eisenhower’s Interstate Highway was laid in St. Charles. The diversification of America’s energy portfolio is just as “game-changing” as were these major milestones in our nation’s history. Missouri’s unique market characteristics and inexpensive coal generated power demand a robust and elegant clean energy solution. A clean energy business model that works here could very well show the way for other states to build a sound, sustainable, market-friendly approach, toward propelling the energy efficiency and renewable energy industries into the mainstream. The Show Me State could help show the way as a gateway to a new economy.

In the next ten years, the idea of an energy audit and retrofit on your home could very well become as commonplace as a safety and emissions test for your car. Energy efficiency and renewable energy are about jobs, and domestically manufactured products like weather-strip, insulation, solar panels and caulking. Estimates fly around about the size of this national “revolution of retrofits”, from 1 trillion dollars of economic activity to a recent figure we heard from the Department of Energy roadshow in Kansas City, a gargantuan 6 trillion dollars coast-to-coast. Stimulus
funds for weatherization programs or the pending Home Star “Cash for Caulkers”, will only last for a couple of years. Properly run, PACE programs promise to be the sound and sustainable business model that will carry the energy efficiency and renewable energy sectors into the years ahead.

Okay, this is getting Sirius

26 Thursday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2010, animal cruelty, ballot initiative, dogs, missouri, Proposition B, Puppy mills

Proposition B is on the November ballot. It would:

…amend Missouri law to require large-scale dog breeding operations to provide each dog under their care with sufficient food, clean water, housing and space; necessary veterinary care; regular exercise and adequate rest between breeding cycles.  The amendment further prohibits any breeder from having more than 50 breeding dogs for the purpose of selling their puppies as pets.  The amendment also creates a misdemeanor crime of “puppy mill cruelty” for any violations…

Some big contributions have come in for Missourians for the Protection of Dogs, a group which supports the ballot initiative’s restrictions.

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 8/26/2010

ASPCA

New York, NY

8/26/2010

$200,000.00

[emphasis added]

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 8/24/2010

The Humane Society of the United States

Gaithersburg, MD

8/24/2010

$500,000.00

[emphasis added]

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 8/4/2010

Mary and Peter Max

New York, NY

8/5/2010

$10,000.00

Leslie Bhutani

Greenwich, CT

8/5/2010

$5,000.00

[emphasis added]

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 8/4/2010

Big Cat Rescue Corporation

Tampa, FL

8/3/2010

$5,000.00

Animal Welfare Advocacy Inc

Mamaroneck, NY

8/3/2010

$10,000.00

[emphasis added]

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf]8/1/2010

The Fund for Animals

New York, NY

7/30/2010

$10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Okay, this looks like it’s one of three things – no one in Missouri is sufficiently bothered by the problem this initiative seeks to correct that they want to part with large sums of money to help pass it, or the economy is so bad in Missouri that no one has the big bucks to contribute, or the people that have the big bucks to contribute are contributing to something else. Like, I dunno, say, a ballot initiative that’ll gut the finances of Missouri’s two largest cities.

The big contributions continue:

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 7/30/2010

Paula Kislak, DVM

Santa Barbara CA

7/30/2010

$5,000.00

[emphasis added]

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 7/28/2010

Michael Katz

New York, NY

7/27/2010

$10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Whew. We finally got one from Missouri. I’m somewhat relieved.

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C091304 MISSOURIANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF DOGS [pdf] 7/21/2010

Humane Society of Missouri

St. Louis, MO

7/21/2010

8,088.10

[emphasis added]

I bet if you vote yes on Proposition B your puppies will thank you.

Beyond Washington: The Oil Industry Buys Influence

26 Thursday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

I worked on Capitol Hill for a long time, and I do not consider myself naive about the inner workings of Washington. But even I was surprised by two revelations this week exposing the amount of money the oil industry is spending to buy political influence.

The first eye-opener came from recently released lobbying numbers. The OpenSecrets blog reported that the oil and gas industry poured $174 million into the political system in 2009. That’s eight times more than the green groups.

What did the oil and gas industry get for its money? A handful of Senators who blocked all attempts by the Senate to pass a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill that would have made fossil fuel industries start cleaning up their global warming pollution.

This week’s second revelation made that difference abundantly clear. Jane Mayer wrote an investigative piece in the New Yorker about the brothers David and Charles Koch who run Koch Industries — the biggest corporation you’ve never heard of — and who have spent more than $100 million on anti-government causes.

Koch Industries owns oil refineries and 4,000 miles of pipeline, and was named one of the top 10 air polluters in the nation in a 2010 UMass-Amherst report. The Kochs’ political donations are often aimed at promoting their libertarian views, but they also directly benefit their own profit margins. They have donated millions of dollars to nonprofit groups that fight environmental regulation and seed doubt about climate science. In fact, a Greenpeace report called them a “kingpin of climate science denial.” And though green groups tend to paint ExxonMobil as the worst of the worst when it comes to lobbying against climate legislation, Koch outspent even ExxonMobil.

One of David Koch’s pet projects is the group Americans for Prosperity, a group he founded and funds but positions as a grassroots movement. An ad for one of its training sessions for Tea Party activists says, “The voices of average Americans are being drowned out by lobbyists and special interests. But you can do something about it.”

But when Americans for Prosperity hosts at least 80 events protesting climate legislation, is it really acting in the interest of average Americans or the interest of oil industry donors?

When it funds an attack ad against Representative Betsey Markey from Colorado because she supported climate legislation last summer that would have brought 30,000 jobs to her state, who is it benefiting?

And when the group pledges to spend an additional $45 million before the midterm elections, is that money really coming from grassroots activists, or from deep corporate pockets? These fat cats pretend to fraternize with the ordinary folks who dangle tea bags from their tri-cornered hats, but, in fact, they are just using activists to put a populist face on their industry agenda.

Manipulating other people’s fears about the economy when you are a billionaire — I would call that the depth of cynicism. But considering those billionaires are getting in the way of climate solutions, clean energy and green jobs in America; I have to instead call it dangerous.  

Emerson (r) lashes out at Sowers (D) over the airwaves in the 8th Congressional District

26 Thursday Aug 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2010, 8th Congressional District, ads, Jo Ann Emerson, missouri, Tommy Sowers

Previously: Tommy Sowers (D) in the 8th Congressonal District: clubbing Jo Ann Emerson (r) with the bailout

Tommy Sowers’ (D) campaign started airing a television ad and Jo Ann Emerson’s (r) campaign followed suit. The Sowers campaign issued the following statement in response to the Emerson ad:

“Emerson is trying to change the subject, because she doesn’t want to talk about her vote for the Wall St Bailout, her trade votes that have killed SE Missouri manufacturing, and […] the union pension bailout scheme she is sponsoring. All 3 are incredibly unpopular with voters in the district. This also serves as recognition of how threatened Emerson is by Tommy Sowers. She’s never mentioned any of her opponents by name in past TV ads, now she’s doing it more than 2 months before the election. She thinks her support in the district is a mile wide, but it’s an inch deep.”

Announcer: Where do they stand? On health care Tommy Sowers wants government in charge.

[Tommy Sowers, Government Run Health Care]

Sowers supports keeping the Obama health care takeover.

[Tommy Sowers, Southeast Missourian, 11,8/09, “Sowers Said He Would Vote For It.”]

Higher taxes, more spending, less control of your care.

[Tommy Sowers, Higher Taxes, More Spending, Less Control]

Missouri needs a leader…

[Missouri needs a Leader]

…not an Obama Pelosi yes man.

[Tommy Sowers, Obama-Pelosi, Yes Man]

Jo Ann Emerson fought the health care bill…

[Jo Ann Emerson Fought Obamacare]

…and is working for repeal so doctors make decisions, not bureaucrats. Putting people before politics…

[People Before Politics]

…Jo Ann Emerson for Congress.

[Paid For By Team Emerson. Approved By Jo Ann Emerson.]

Jo Ann Emerson:  I’m Jo Ann Emerson and I approved this message.

Okay. Let’s deconstruct this just a little bit. To advocate that the health care reform bill is destroying a health care system that’s working you should probably point out the stuff you think works.

Let’s see, universal access to affordable health care? Nope. People without health insurance get their medical care late and in hospital emergency departments where the care is most expensive. Who pays for that? Uh, the hospitals recoup those costs by charging those with insurance more.

“…Jo Ann Emerson fought the health care bill and is working for repeal…”

Prohibitions against restricting coverage of preexisting conditions? Prohibitions against denying people the insurance coverage they paid for because the actually got sick (rescission)? Really, Jo Ann Emerson thinks those provisions of the health care bill need to be repealed?

“…so doctors make decisions, not bureaucrats…”

Uh, what color is the sky in Jo Ann Emerson’s world? Insurance company bureaucrats don’t make our health care decisions for us now? Really?

“…Obama Pelosi…”

Uh, Jo Ann Emerson is not running against Nancy Pelosi, she’s running against Tommy Sowers, who also happens to be a veteran. That’s a nice touch by Jo Ann Emerson, by the way, having veterans surround her at the end of the commercial. I wonder if this comment came up while they were filming that scene for her commercial? Just asking.

“…Putting people before politics…”

Her campaign can’t be serious in using that cliche phrase in a political commercial – unless they’re delusional or think everyone else in the world is too stupid to compare her words with her record.

Uh, by the way, as a member of Congress didn’t Jo Ann Emerson have access to government health insurance before the health care bill was signed into law? Just asking.  

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more
  • For the company…
  • Iowa, I-80
  • About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing…
  • Halo

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,050,646 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...