• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Ryancare

Get to know Mitt Romney’s VP pick

11 Saturday Aug 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

missouri, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Ryan Budget, Ryancare, Todd Akin

Today Mitt Romney announced that he had capitulated to radical rightwingers in his party and chosen Paul Ryan (of Ryancare fame) as his Vice-Presidential pick. In case you’re not familiar with Ryan’s claim to fame, his budget (which Romney – in spite of his efforts today to pretend otherwise – has repeatedly endorsed), the following video will tell you all you need to know:

Pretty dreadful, right? Bear in mind that the issue of Ryan’s awful economic theories goes far beyond the presidential race. Todd Akin – along with most GOP House candidates – has also endorsed the radical and cruel Ryan budget. A vote for  Romney is a vote for Ryancare, a vote for Akin will double the damage, and sending GOPers back to the House will more than tripple the harm that Paul Ryan will manage, through their agency, to do to the middle class.

The selection of Ryan is not only problematic from an economic point of view,  however. I noted above that Romney is reluctant to emphasize his past endorsement of the Ryan plan, which suggests an additional concern about his ability to function as President. What does it say about his character, when he tries to weasel out of his own VP pick, deny his own stated economic beliefs – while touting a vague Romney budget plan that has not yet been vetted – and which, hence, cannot be criticized as thoroughly as the unpopular Ryan budget? Only fools think that in the political sphere they can always, in the words of the aphorism, have their cake and eat it too. Apropos of which, Ed Kilgore writes:

I struggle for a suitable analogy: becoming a Lutheran and saying you’ll maintain your own views on the sufficiency of faith for salvation? Hiring Mike Leach to coach your football team but reserving the right to tell him to install the Wishbone Offense? Marrying Kim Kardashian on condition she will avoid publicity?

Of course, any assumption that Romney would differ from Ryan on important issues like Medicare presupposes that his right-wing billionaire support base would even permit that type of independence. Romney certainly hasn’t had what it takes to stand up to the new, hardcore, fringewing GOP so far, which is why his running mate is a man described by The Globe and Mail as the ” Tea Party’s favourite nerd,” or an “intellectual version of Sarah Palin.” Intellectual in this context, of course, means that Ryan can speak in coherent sentences.

Claire McCaskill, commies, liberals, centrists and Obamacare

08 Thursday Mar 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, health care, Mediare, missouri, Obamacare, Ryancare

So Rush Limbaugh thinks our Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill is a “commie babe liberal“? Lordy! Sure fooled me. I can’t speak to the “babe” epithet, but nobody’s really a “commie” nowadays. It’s passé. McCaskill might be mildly liberal, although I think that she’s been pretty careful to try to hew to the right-of-center line with only tiny detours leftwards now and then. If labels were strictly a function of policy positions, I suppose I’d be inclined to describe her as similar to that old standby, the “Rockefeller Republican” with a little feminist leavening. But these days, of course, we Democrats make do with what we can get.

To make that point even clearer, McCaskill proved that it takes a centrist to know a centrist policy when she pointed out that Obamacare is a mild-mannered and moderate plan that lines up with many GOP preferences. In McCaskill’s words it is Ryancare for the non-elderly:

“The irony of this situation is that these are private insurance companies people will shop to buy their insurance. It’s not the government,” she told KMOX of St. Louis on Wednesday. “It’s exactly what Paul Ryan wants to do for Medicare.”

TPM explains the seeming GOP cognitive dissonance about Obamacare in terms of the underlying agendas of progressives and conservatives:

McCaskill’s point is an important one that exposes the real nature of the underlying fight over how to fix health care. The progressive ideal is a single payer system, a la Medicare, but for everyone. The conservative ideal is a deregulated market-based system with a diminished federal role. The Affordable Care Act, despite the right’s protestations of socialism, is a middle ground between the two. And the insurance exchanges mirror what the Ryan plan does to Medicare – as Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) have conceded.

These awkward admissions reveal that the broader fight is really about which direction to move vis-a-vis national health policy. Conservatives hate Obamacare because, by setting up regulated, subsidized exchanges for the public at large, it moves the existing system away from their goal of rolling back federal health care programs. Liberals hate Ryancare because, by replacing Medicare with a subsidized private insurance market, it constitutes a leap backwards from the current state of affairs.

As TPM’s Sahil Kapur implies above, no matter how big a backwards step Ryancare might represent, Obamacare still constitutes a mighty step forward for American health care overall given the nature of the previous status quo. It represents a necessary compromise in light of the rightward drift of American politics over the past couple of decades, which has created an environment in which a middle-aged, middling moderate pol can be described by a nasty-mouthed shock-jock as a “commie liberal babe.”

 

John Brunner's tease

18 Tuesday Oct 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

GOP senatorial primary, John Brunner, Medicare, missouri, Ryancare, social security, taxes

Finally, we get a glimpse of what GOP senatorial primary contender, John Brunner, actually thinks about some of the issues that Missourians are concerned about. So far, his approach to public campaigning has been like that of a burlesque fan dancer, tantalizing the audience with hints about what’s behind the fan while revealing almost nothing of interest.

Recently, though, Brunner lowered the fan for a tiny peak at what he’s got to offer. No tax hikes for sure – but we didn’t really expect him to endorse the popular desire to have the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share. He’s running for the nomination in today’s Republican Tea Party after all. Otherwise, he identifies problems he says he would address – like keeping jobs in the country – but seems unable or, perhaps, hesitant to let us know just how he would address them.

Most interesting is trying to figure out how Brunner reconciles his stated desire to “protect” seniors with his subsequent comment that the Ryan plan, which would privatize Social Security and decimate the Medicare, offers a “a fantastic step in the right direction.” To be fair, he adds that he would like to see a Democratic plan as well – seemingly unaware that it’s been on offer for some time. But, of course, financial stimulus to stabilize the economy, raising the cap on Social Security income, and endorsing those parts of ObamaCares that would slow the growth of health care and concomitant Medicare costs are all solutions that run afoul of GOP orthodoxy, and I suspect that Mr. Brunner would find them anathema.

I don’t know about you, but if this is all that Brunner’s got to show, it doesn’t strike me as particularly edifying. Nor does it deviate in any interesting way from what the other two candidates, Sarah Steelman and Todd Akin, have put on display. I hope he thinks that sinking a big chunk of his considerable fortune into the effort of getting himself to Washington so he can read from the same Republican playbook the other candidates have in hand is worth the price.

Photo by Michael Albov from Wikimedia commons      

Sarah Steelman: Foundering between Obamacare and Ryancare

17 Friday Jun 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Medicare, missouri, Ryancare, Sarah Steelman

FiredUp! has done an excellent job of detailing Sarah Steelman’s efforts to have her cake and eat it too when it comes to the topic of Paul Ryan’s plan to kill the Medicare program that has served us so well. Her spokesperson, Rick Wilson, has attempted to throw her a lifesaver as she grapples with the dilemma of how to avoid the poison apple that Ryancare represents, claiming that she doesn’t need to commit to Ryan’s plan or disavow it because “The test here is between people who are serious about reforming Medicare and people who are not.”

This response is, of course, silly since Steelman was asked to evaluate a very specific plan to “reform” Medicare, and her answer indicates that she is either not intellectually equipped to do so, or is afraid to come down on either side of the issue. It does, however, suggest that the real question is actually whether or not Medicare needs to be reformed and suggests further that Steelman believes it does. (Of course, last February she seemed to believve that Medicare was unconstitutional – ground she doesn’t seem to want to revisit right now.)

Perhaps the next question Steelman should be asked is why Medicare needs to be reformed. Contrary to the impression that all the current banter about entitlements suggests, Medicare is currently solvent and will be so for a number of years. It is also considerably more efficient in terms of its cost-to-service ratio than the private health care sector, which suggests that the issue to be addressed is not structural.  

The real risk to Medicare is rising health care costs that will cause demands on its resources to grow significantly. These costs have nothing to do with Medicare itself, but with our national health care delivery system. If the GOP would only stop their tantrums about “Obamacare” and assist its implementation like responsible adults, we would soon know if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions that were designed to control costs were going to be effective and adjust them if needed. Of course, that would require a commitment to the real work of governing, rather than to ideology.

Remind me now, where does Steelman stand on the ACA? Oops! She wants to repeal it. Since our only real choices right now are between the models suggested by Obamacare or Ryancare, cutting health care costs or gutting a successful health care delivery system, I think we can guess where she stands.  

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Democratic Party News
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Josh Hawley
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 615,512 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...