And some people get lucrative book deals.

Today:

Maggie Haberman @maggieNYT
The committee has been criticized as looking to target Trump politically. They are not at all shying away from the fact that not a single one of them thinks Trump should be back in office, and that’s part of what they’re demonstrating here.
10:54 AM · Jun 13, 2022

Doing some heavy lifting there.

Same difference:

Some of the responses:

By WHOM

“The committee has been criticized”?! By whom? Maggie Haberman is spreading the word here, but who else? By Trump and his allies is to be expected. I just didn’t know Maggie was one of them!

Who is doing the criticizing Maggie? “People are saying” doing a heavy lift here. Be better.

Maggie’s cash cow is becoming ground beef.

I’m unsure how we made it thru the 4 years.

We didn’t.

Typo. Fixed it: The committee has been criticized as exposing Trump the way he really is. They are not at all shying away from presenting factual information, which would prevent Trump from getting back in office, and that’s part of what they’re demonstrating here.

“…part of what they’re demonstrating here.”

Care to elaborate what the other parts are, Maggie?

Uh yeah. And they think the world is round also. Not shying away from that either.

He shouldn’t, obviously. What’s your point?

Not too make too huge a leap here, but sitting members of congress should not feel that people who lost elections should be in office just because they want to.

That’s your take away? What a weird conclusion to draw, Maggie

Sorry for your loss

I know that’s bad for Maggie-business.

Mags sounds upset

This is one of those tweets that tries not to piss anybody off but totally backfires.

You’ve done enough damage already.

Amazing that people think that a guy who launched a coup shouldn’t hold public office again. Hard hitting analysis here.

They’re recruiting Americans for Team Normal. Sorry you didn’t make the cut Maggie. #sad

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.