• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: November 2009

Denny Hoskins: Noun, Verb…CPA?

12 Thursday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 10 Comments

Oh. My. And I thought Denny Hoskins was having a bad freshman year before the news broke yesterday that he owes over $20,000 in back taxes on properties owned by Hos Properties, LLC, the  rental property business he owns with his brother.

I would imagine it is something of a toss-up which Denny Hoskins regrets more this week…All that yammering he did about being a CPA and how responsible he would be with the taxpayers money, or the slim 122 votes that he won his seat by.

We snagged a screen shot of his website to preserve his touted CPA bona fides

To his credit, he didn’t lie and obfuscate when confronted with the information available in the public record.

Rep. Denny Hoskins admitted to The Daily Star-Journal on Wednesday that he failed to pay more than $16,000 in taxes last year.

Hoskins owed the tax bill for the entire 11 months he has served as a House member, with the debt beginning Dec. 31.

Hoskins – who touted being a certified public accountant and who made working to improve the economy cornerstones of his election campaign last year – blamed the failure to pay taxes last year on the recession. He said Hos Properties LLC, a company owned by Hoskins and his brother, owes the taxes.

“It’s not something my brother and I are proud of, but our rental property business is struggling just like other, many Missouri businesses, and when our tenants are struggling to pay their rent due to the economic recession, we struggle to pay our mortgage payment and property taxes,” Hoskins said.

In addition to owing $16,091 in taxes used to fund local schools and other taxing entities, Hos Properties owes $4,227 in penalties.

Now, beating up on Denny Hoskins is just about my favorite sport outside of World Cup Soccer. I think he’s a moron and an embarrassment and has no damned business in the state legislature. But do I think he would be behind in his taxes if the economy didn’t suck and people were paying their rent?

Honestly, no. I don’t. I feel the same way his opponent does.

The only announced candidate in the race for Hoskins’ seat in the 121st District, Courtney Cole, Warrensburg, said she paid all of her taxes.

“Of course I did,” Cole said. “They can check all they want.”

Cole said she “feels bad for him,” but everyone must pay taxes.

“I feel he’s doing a disservice to our district by not paying his taxes, especially somebody who’s an accountant. It’s unfortunate that he doesn’t do what’s expected of all of the citizens within the district,” Cole said.

And they have obviously been trying to collect on monies owed, filing in small claims court to collect on the bad debts their tenants have left them holding. But on the other hand, Warrensburg is a small town, and they got twenty grand in arrears on taxes, so I have to ask…was anyone paying their rent?  

A small claim filed by HOS Properties

in 2009…

…signed by Denny Hoskins.

On yet another hand, he hasn’t let us forget since he announced he was running for the seat, he is a CPA and the code of conduct that he is sworn to mandates he pay all taxes on time, for himself and his clients. And that’s pretty immutable.  

FDL Action Health Care Update: Wednesday (11/11/09)

12 Thursday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

( – promoted by Clark)

Here are the FDL Action health care reform highlights for Wednesday, November 11.

1. Jane Hamsher points us to Kagro’s “excellent rundown of what happened on the public option fight,” and also why abortion rights activists, with “an existing network of professional lobbyists and policy analysts, plus a multi-million dollar funding base,” didn’t see the Stupak amendment coming and work effectively to head it off. Simply bizarre.

2. Jon Walker reports on Sen. Tom Carper’s “no good, super terrible, completely awful, new new new ‘alternative’ to the public option,” namely “to take Olympia Snowe’s worthless trigger idea (which already should have 60 votes if no liberal Democratic senators bolt), and  weaken it further for no reason.” Brilliant!

3. Jon Walker writes that “if Harry Reid tries to go this route [e.g., “accept some worthless fig leaf like the Snowe’s trigger or Carper’s Plan B”] to get a watered-down compromise, it will not ‘show the left that he did everything he could do.'” In the end, Walker concludes, “The left will not be ‘placated’ by a big show and half hearted measures.”  Sorry, but that’s not what we’ve worked so hard for the last several years.

4. Jane Hamsher writes that “the absolute best, most optimistic outlook for passing a bill in the House without a public option means that 13 or fewer progressive votes could stop it.” She then proceeds to list 16 progressives who have pledged that they’ll vote against any bill without a public option. The result of this analysis is powerful: “no health care bill will pass without a public option. Period.”  Now that we’ve got that out of the way, how about the Senate stops wasting time and gets this thing done already?

5. Jon Walker says that “PolitiFact Is Wrong About Nita Lowey: Abortion Coverage Could Become Rare With Stupak Amendment.” What’s weird is that even after Walker contacted PolitiFact and told them exactly why they were wrong, they still would not correct their story, arguing that the possibility of abortion coverage becoming rare “seems remote.” Based on this, Walker remarks, snarkily, “PolitiFact claims to be a ‘fact checker,’ not a ‘in my opinion it seems like an unlikely outcome’ checker.” Heh.

6. Finally, Jon Walker reports that “since the House agreed to decouple the public option from Medicare rates, [Sen. Kent] Conrad has expressed some tepid openness to the public plan.” True, it may not be a “ringing endorsement” of the public option by Conrad, but on the bright side he “does not sound like a man who is about to threaten to bring the whole bill down if it includes one.”  Hey, that almost makes me tepidly optimistic!  LOL

St. Louis Archbishop Used "Special Needs Fund" to Fight Gay Marriage

12 Thursday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Apropos hidden fundamentalist influence in politics, the Post-Dispatch is reporting that St. Louis Archbishop dipped into a “special needs” fund to donate to a ballot initiative in Maine to  

Is Ike Skelton a member of The Family?

11 Wednesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

abortion, health care reform, Ike Skelton, Jeff Sharlet, missouri, Rachel Maddow, Stupak-PItts Amendment, The Family

Nobody was too surprised that Ike Skelton voted for the repressive Stupak-Pitts Amendment which, if it is retained, will do more to impede access to abortion than any other piece of legislation since  Roe v. Wade made abortion legal. Nor was it surprising that Skelton also voted against the Health Care Reform Bill itself – although the Stupak-Pitts amendment was supposed to buy the votes of Republican-lite Democrats like Skelton.

However, Rachel Maddow, in a discussion of the roots of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment last night suggested a sinister influence that might have played a role in determining Skelton’s votes. In the video below (at point 2:09) Maddow states that Skelton is reported to be a member of The Family, a shadowy, elite, evangelical network that, according to author Jeff Sharlet, works through susceptible politicians to move our government closer to becoming a fundamentalist Christian state:

There’s nothing intrinsically evil about being conservative, moderate, or whatever Skelton calls himself, though one can argue that his policy positions are mistaken. Neither should one question his Christian faith per se.  However, what does deserve to be examined in the light of full disclosure is the possibility that Skelton, an eleted official, is unduly influenced by a secretive religious organization that works to exert a sub rosa influence on the political life of the nation.      

Veteran's Day

11 Wednesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

McCaskill has a nice YouTube up on Veteran’s Day:

On another note, I grew up in the South in the Reagan era, in a region that has always paid particular attention to its military heroes and in a political climate where pride in the US military was again pre-eminent. So when I spoke to the combat veterans in my family about war, pressing them for stories of heroism and glory, I was inevitably confused when they rarely would say even a word about their time in battle. They often told tales of their travels to faraway places, of friends they had made from across the country, and especially of the good times they had trying to pass the interminable boredom while waiting to fight again. But even when pressed, even when knowing that I was waiting to lionize them after a tale of danger, they were all reluctant to open up about facing the enemy. My grandfather served in the Pacific aboard a destroyer. His brother flew in the Army Air Force in Europe, including during the latter days of the Battle of the Bulge. And my other grandfather’s brother fought in Korea while my grandfather trained Marines in the States.

To this day, the one who has opened up the most about his experiences in the military is my grandfather, the one who never deployed to combat. When I was in my early twenties, he told me in one of our usual backyard conversations over cigarettes and coffee in the Louisiana heat that he was incredibly bitter about the end of his career in the Marines. He had been picked to view the detonation of an atomic bomb, which he believed and still believes to be an honor. But after the detonation of the bomb, the unit to which he belonged was ordered to conduct maneuvers around ground zero and return for an extended period of R & R. It was only later that he realized that he had been selected as a guinea pig, that the US military had only been interested in seeing if a force could be deployed to a target in the aftermath of a nuclear bombing and still remain effective after radiation exposure.

I don’t mean to turn this post into a sob story about my grandfather getting misused by the military, because while he was bitter about his experience, he did not regret becoming a Marine. Neither did any of my other veteran relatives, despite experiencing things too horrible to share with those who did not go through the same trials and privations.

What I’m trying to get at, in my own clumsy way, is that veterans have it rough, and considering what they have gone through, it’s only fair to honor the sacrifice they made. And no, I’m not just talking about putting up a post on Veteran’s Day, or filming a short video, although it is important to vocalize a big “Thank You.”

I’m also talking about giving a small monetary token of thanks. I’m giving $11 to the Eleven Eleven campaign, which aims to raise $11 million from 11 million Americans to contribute to the welfare of US veterans. I know times are tight for a lot of you out there, because it is for me, too, but this is a really good cause for others who have given a lot more of themselves.

My Collections

11 Wednesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

collectible tools

collectible phones

sewing collectibles

vanity collectibles

railroad collectibles

collectible tools

collectible phones

sewing collectibles

vanity collectibles

railroad collectibles

"A Gentleman's Agreement"?: there ought to be a law, part 2

11 Wednesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Aaron Podolefsky, meta, missouri, Missouri Sunshine Law, University of Central Missouri

This is the twenty-sixth post in an ongoing series as we file Missouri Sunshine Law (RSMo 610) requests and investigate the non-renewal of the contract of University of Central Missouri President Aaron Podolefsky. Links to previous coverage are below the fold. BG and MB

We were curious about who recommended the appointments of the four University of Central Missouri Board members who voted not to renew President Aaron Podolefsky’s contract. Matt Blunt was Governor of Missouri at the time of these appointments. We sent a Missouri Sunshine Law request to the university’s “Custodian of Records”:

[….]

date:Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM

subject:Sunshine request

Please provide the following documents under RSMo 610:

The packets of information for appointment to the Board of Governors which include resumes and letters of recommendation for the following members of the University of Central Missouri, previously known as Central Missouri State University:

Weldon Brady

Walter Hickland [sic]

Richard Phillips

Edward Baker

Thank you,

[….]

We received the following reply:

[….]

Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 2:17:29 PM

Subject: Re: Sunshine request

[….]

Pursuant to your request of October 22, 2009, attached are the appointment letters and resumes of UCM Board members Weldon Brady, Walter Hicklin, Richard Phillips, and Edward Baker as provided by the Governor’s Office.

[….]

Custodian of Records

[….]

We didn’t get letters of reference, but we did get the appointment letters (in the case of Richard Phillips, his commission letter) and resumes. The documents for three of the board members had fax headers at the top of each page.

Fax header from the appointment documentation for Richard Phillips to the University of Central Missouri Board of Governors sent to the university from Governor Matt Blunt’s office in 2005.

Fax header from the appointment documentation for Edward Baker to the University of Central Missouri Board of Governors sent to the university from Governor Matt Blunt’s office in 2007.

Fax header from the appointment documentation for Walter Hicklin to the University of Central Missouri Board of Governors sent to the university from Governor Matt Blunt’s office in 2007.

The documentation for board member Weldon Brady did not have fax headers.

Well, no problem we reasoned, the appointments were made by then Missouri Governor Matt Blunt, so we could probably ask the current governor’s office for copies of any original letters of reference or recommendations for those individuals:

[….]

Date: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Subject: RE: UCM Sunshine Request

[….]

I have referred your request to our custodian of records, Nikki Loethen. Thanks

[….]

Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:02 PM

[….]

Subject: UCM Sunshine Request

[….] can you either handle this yourself under RSMo 610 or refer me to the proper person to fill this request?

Please provide the following documents under RSMo 610:

The packets of information compiled for appointment to the Board of Governors at the University of Central Missouri (previously known as Central Missouri State University) which include resumes and letters of reference for the following members of the board:

Weldon Brady

Walter Hicklin

Richard Phillips

Edward Baker

Thank you

[….]

So, we waited. And waited.

Think about that. They can’t find the original appointment documents (the historical record!) and all we have access to are faxed copies in the possession of the university.

That could be a problem:

Missouri Revised Statutes

Chapter 109

Public and Business Records

Section 109.210

August 28, 2009

Definitions.

109.210. As used in sections 109.200 to 109.310 the following words and terms have the meanings indicated, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

(1) “Agency”, any department, office, commission, board or other unit of state government or any political or administrative subdivisions created for any purpose under the authorities of or by the state of Missouri;

(2) “Boards”, the local records board;

(3) “Commission”, the state records commission;

(4) “Local record”, any record not a state record;

(5) “Record”, document, book, paper, photograph, map, sound recording or other material, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received pursuant to law or in connection with the transaction of official business. Library and museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, extra copies of documents preserved only for convenience of reference, and stocks of publications and of processed documents are not included within the definition of records as used in sections 109.200 to 109.310, and are hereinafter designated as “nonrecord” materials;

(6) “Secretary”, the secretary of state;

(7) “State record”, any record designated or treated as a state record under state law.

[emphasis added]

Missouri Revised Statutes

Chapter 109

Public and Business Records

Section 109.260

August 28, 2009

Destruction of records and nonrecord materials.

109.260. 1. No record shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of by any agency unless it is determined by the commission or board that the record has no further administrative, legal, fiscal, research or historical value.

2. Nonrecord materials or materials not included within the definition of records as contained in sections 109.200 to 109.310 may, if not otherwise prohibited by law, be destroyed at any time by the agency in possession of such materials with approval of the commission or board. The director of the records management and archives service may formulate advisory procedures and interpretation to guide in the disposition of nonrecord materials.

[emphasis added]

Oopsie.

Missouri Revised Statutes

Chapter 109

Public and Business Records

Section 109.270

August 28, 2009

Records are property of state or local government–not to be damaged or disposed of.

109.270. All records made or received by or under the authority of or coming into the custody, control or possession of state or local officials in the course of their public duties are the property of the state or local government and shall not be mutilated, destroyed, transferred, removed or otherwise damaged or disposed of, in whole or in part, except as provided by law.

[emphasis added]

We understand that another news organization made a similar request to ours, except they asked for the appointment documents for all of the current board members, including those appointed by Governor Bob Holden (previous to Matt Blunt). Our tactical error. But don’t you think it would be ironic if they found the documents from the Bob Holden administration (and,
of course, they have the documents from the current Jay Nixon administration) but they can’t find the documents from the Matt Blunt administration?

Our previous coverage:

Three steps behind, and to the right (January 25, 2008)

Three steps behind, and to the right, part 2 – a microcosm of our universe (September 21, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”? (October 15, 2009) (transcript of a portion of the live radio broadcast)

It wasn’t just about a tree (October 21, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: I heard it on the radio (October 21, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: let’s not get cut out of the will (October 22, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: $87.75 will get you one sheet of paper (October 23, 2009)



“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: They’re not playing hardball, they’re playing cat and mouse
 (October 23, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: a cola and some scoreboards (October 24, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: a few more pieces of the puzzle? (October 28, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: your silence means consent (October 29, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: let’s not get cut out of the will, part 2 (October 30, 2009)

Old media irony impairment (October 30, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement?”: I heard it on the radio, part 2 (October 31, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: where everybody knows your name (October 31, 2009)

Methinks that someone is paying attention! (November 2, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: Bond, Stadium Bond (November 4, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: where everybody knows your name, part 2 (November 4, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: I heard it on the radio, part 3 (November 5, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: nothing succeeds like success (November 6, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: your Friday news dump (November 6, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: nothing exceeds like excess (November 7, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: a grade for Accounting 101 (November 7, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: there ought to be a law (November 8, 2009)

“A Gentleman’s Agreement”?: there’s gotta be a contract around here somewhere (November 9, 2009)

FDL Action Health Care Update: Tuesday (11/10/09)

11 Wednesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

( – promoted by Clark)

Here are the FDL Action health care reform highlights for Tuesday, November 10.

1. Jon Walker warns that the Stupak Amendment “reaches far beyond any of the reporting so far” and could “effectively stop many employer-provided health insurance plans from covering abortions for tens of millions of Americans.” Scary stuff, well beyond the women’s-right-to-choose piece of this monstrosity.

2. Jon Walker points out that although Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) “is completely correct our current system is completely unsustainable and will not survive another decade if it continues in the same manner it has been,” he himself has “yet to endorse the kind of radical reform necessary to reduce cost.”

3. David Dayen provides a rough outline of the Senate schedule for health care.

4. Jon Walker reports that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is prepared to use “reconciliation” if necessary to pass health care reform with a public option.  Is this leading up to a death match between Sanders and Joe Lieberman, who has vowed to fillibuster a public option?  Stay tuned! 🙂

5. Yours truly reports that the House vote on health care has already become an issue in the gubernatorial primary in Alabama.

6. David Dayen writes that “Barbara Boxer sounds confident that the Senate will not be able to join the House in passing restrictive anti-choice language in the health care bill.” Let’s hope Boxer’s confidence isn’t misplaced.

7. Last but not least, Jon Walker says we shouldn’t get too excited about Bill Clinton giving Senate Democrats a pep talk.  Apparently, Clinton “told the Senate Democrats to pass anything, and do it quickly.” Anything?  With all due respect to President Clinton, that’s not really the point here, now is it?

Local Governments Go Green – on TV now!

10 Tuesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Watch the newest episode of Laborvision!  Local governments are taking action to address climate change – hear from three local guests, including Justin Carney from St. Louis County, John Wagner from Focus St. Louis, and Tim Gaidis from HOK.

While climate change legislation is languishing in Congress, local governments are taking steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Learn more about what is being done in metro St. Louis.  

The episode will run on Charter Cable Channel 18 on Wednesday Nov. 11 and Nov. 18 at 730 pm.  

Here is a short clip from the show:

Laborvision clip

White roofs

10 Tuesday Nov 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

If you can ignore all the leaves on the roof, you will notice how white it is. That’s because we just had an elastomeric coating applied. It preserves the roof from those tiny cracks that grow into leaks and end up making you call a roofer. The last roof we put on cost $14,000. Getting a new flat roof put on could drive you into bankruptcy. But while we’re trying to put off by ten years the need for a new roof–or indefinitely, if we reapply the elastomere every 7-10 years–we’re also saving on our cooling bills and helping the environment. As the arctic ice melts, the world will need more white roofs to reflect sunlight. And this roof is highly reflective. It’s rated to reflect up to 88 percent of the sun’s heat, whereas black roofs can absorb up to 85 percent of the sun’s heat.

When Jill Miller of White Caps, Green Collars did the work on our house last week, she said she’d been on a black roof recently when the temp was around seventy and it was too hot to touch. So cities that are seas of these heat absorbing roofs are going to need a new look in the coming decades, the white look. Nobel laureate and Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, is advocating for white roofs on all buildings and for light colored pavement, not only in our country but worldwide.

Obviously, we won’t see any energy savings for quite a few months, but I wanted the roof protected from winter weather. And when summer rolls around, I expect to save 20-50 percent on our cooling bills.

Expect the look of flat roofs in cities all over the world to change in the coming decades.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • MoGop’s Dark Money
  • Campaign Finance: Democracy
  • Campaign Finance: like they need the money
  • Choice in Missouri
  • Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire”

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,703 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...