• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: April 2009

Whose Banana Republic?

23 Thursday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Kit Bond joined the GOP rhetorical offensive against the rule of law today, asserting on MSNBC

“… that those who want to have public hearings and show trials in the United States Congress… would be following tactics that are more appropriate for a banana republic,” replied Bond. “I don’t think the Obama administration wants to say the next time the Republicans get in control they will have show hearing-trials and try to institute criminal prosecutions against people who carried out orders of the Obama administration.”

Bond is evidently not one for making fine distinctions.  Somebody should explain to him that calls to hold lawbreakers accountable do not involve mere policy differences or the triumphalism of a successful political putsch, but simple questions of law and justice — and, of course, if folks in the Obama administration break the law, they should all be held accountable.

Obama, after trying to shuffle away from the issue, seems to finally realize this fact, which is why he has made it clear that resolution of the legal questions must be left to the DOJ — without political interference from the White House. Why is it just Senator Bond and his  Republican pals who have so much trouble with the concept of legal redress?

However, if Republicans like Senator Bond want to compare this call for justice to politics in banana republics, Josh Marshall offers an analogy that strikes me as vastly more apt:

In former Banana Republics, in their post-transition- to-democracy phases, you’ll often have a Junta Party. It’s an opposition party whose main goal isn’t to get elected so much as to maintain the legacy of the former junta regime, defend its record of service to the state and most of all keep its former leaders from being put on trial or shipped off to the Hague. Often the party will be headed up by the former Generals themselves. But if they’re dead or otherwise occupied in the slammer or abroad, maybe you’ll have their relatives or the one-time cronies and lickspittles of this or that el jefe of the old regime filling the leadership roles.

Sound like anyone we’ve heard opining on Bush & Co. law-breakers recently, Senator Bond?

 

Twitter: Sarah (r) and the Chocolate Factory

23 Thursday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2010, missouri, Sarah Steelman, Senate, unemployment

Former Missouri State Treasurer and probable candidate for the open U.S. Senate seat Sarah Steelman (r) posted on Twitter about a visit to a local business she arranged for a class she teaches in Springfield::

Took my class to Askinosie Chocolate Factory tonight. Shawn with great humility talked about his business and helping kids. 5:58 PM Apr 21st from web

He is changing his neighborhood, community and the world by the choices he makes. His Chocolate University is such a great! 6:00 PM Apr 21st from web

I think the students appreciated what he is doing. He is a capitalist who makes positive choice based on service not “greed”. 6:02 PM Apr 21st from web

He has a new initiative to help unemployed people.Not relying on government – but each other. He is truly an inspiration to all who meet him 6:05 PM Apr 21st from web

The initiative of this one small business is a good thing. Let’s ask Sarah Steelman to do the math and try to figure out how many small businesses it would take, choosing to do the right thing, to solve this problem in the entire United States:

Table A-12.  Alternative measures of labor underutilization

(Percent)

U-6 Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time or economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.

March 2009 – 15.6

That’s an ideological republican for you, tout the virtues of someone nobly putting their finger in the dike (and this is a good thing) while ignoring the fact that all around you the dam has been over topped and breached.

This is what the government stimulus plan that Sarah Steelman so disdains is starting to do in Missouri:

…Lost Creek is a wind energy project located in DeKalb County [Missouri] being developed by Wind Capital Group. The $300 million project will be capable of generating 150 MW of power when it is completed and will utilize transformers manufactured by ABB at the Jefferson City plant by UAW labor…Lost Creek is a beneficiary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, and will create hundreds of local construction jobs.

Not to mention all those jobs at ABB in Jefferson City manufacturing transformers for those wind turbines.

Or, do we just let everyone eat cake?

More Trash at the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch

22 Wednesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

It shows up any time there’s an article about crime:

bud fox  April 21, 2009 3:23PM CST

When will we construct a wall around North St. Louis and North St. Louis County that keeps these animals within the confines of their own ghetto? Only when the wall is built will any of us live without fear of being killed, mugged, robbed, raped, stabbed, beaten, stomped on, shot at, run over, car-jacked, etc… did I mention mugged? This should have been part of King Obama’s stimulous plan… A great wall. they could have even hired minority contractors and built it themselves; We need to protect our borders hear at home from these thugs instead of worrying about the US/Mexican border.

itzmedbd  April 21, 2009 3:38PM CST

Riff raff everywhere. They should string him up and lynch him

foxxydrummer  April 21, 2009 3:47PM CST

Ummm, Ourcity, the israelis built walls around the Palestinians, and it’s working for them. And yes, we can do it with guns. 9MM through the torso and all we have to do is pay for these thugs’ funerals.

Lovely job that the moderators are doing over there, encouraging rational and civil discussion and all.

Twittering the Party Line: Roy Blunt (r) and the Employee Free Choice Act

22 Wednesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2010, EFCA, missouri, Robin Carnahan, Roy Blunt, Senate, Twitter

The 2010 open seat U.S. Senate race in Missouri is starting to heat up. Congressman Roy Blunt (r – lobbyists) has taken to scolding Robin Carnahan via Twitter posts for supporting the Employee Free Choice Act.

Roy Blunt:

I see Robin Carnahan’s spokesman finally admits Robin Carnahan wants to abolish the secret ballot to form a union. about 13 hours ago from mobile web

Uh, nice hyperbole Roy. Never let facts get in the way of republican talking points, eh? EFCA gives the choice to the workers, not their employers.

Roy Blunt:

I support freedom for workers with federally-supervised secret ballot elections and democracy on the job. about 13 hours ago from mobile web

You mean like this?:

…Last June, the 230 workers at nine newspapers voted for representation by the California Media Workers Guild, which was working with CWA in a “One Big Bang” campaign. Just two weeks later, 29 workers were fired, two-thirds of them union supporters. Steffens, an award-winning reporter at the Contra Costa Times, was among them.

Management claimed layoffs “weren’t based on seniority or merit or skills, that they were just taking positions that they didn’t need or couldn’t afford anymore,” Steffens said. No one who opposed union representation was let go.

The regional National Labor Relations Board sided with MediaNews, claiming there was no proof that the company had targeted union supporters. The case has been appealed to the NLRB in Washington, D.C.

The company clearly knew who the union activists were, and was pretty sure how most people were voting, Steffens said. The captive audience meetings gave managers plenty of clues and they demanded information from lower-level editors.

That makes the claims of Employee Free Choice Act opponents that unions want to take away secret ballot elections especially galling, Steffens said. “That just kills me, the idea that all these companies are trying to protect our rights,” she said. “We had a manager who admitted that he was being asked for daily counts of where everyone he supervised stood. How is that a secret ballot?…”

[emphasis added]

Roy Blunt:

Robin Carnahan wants less freedom for workers with a system where workers can be coerced to sign a card to form a union. about 13 hours ago from mobile web

And how many instances of that over the last, say, seventy years? As opposed to employer coercion? Sean McGarvey, Secretary-Treasurer Building and Construction Trades Department AFL-CIO:

…The Employee Free Choice Act doesn’t take away secret ballots [voice: “Right!”] Doesn’t intimidate anybody. [voice: “Right!”] Stewart Acuff, who is a friend of Teresa [Hensley] and her husband [Kenny Hensley], husband’s college buddy, is the organizing director for the AFL-CIO. And when you hear people talk about union thugs intimidating people in organizing drives in order to get them to sign cards [voice: “Liars!”] [laughter] It’s worse than that. [laughter] They have no idea how an organizing drive works. Organizers don’t all of a sudden arrive at a door and decide to organize a company. It’s the employees of that company that decide that they’re not likin’ the way things are goin’ and they want to have an opportunity to come together and collectively bargain instead of collectively beg with their boss. And they reach out, then activists inside that company reach out for the union and ask for assistance. And that’s what we lend. Technical assistance. Money and expertise. There’s no intimidation.

And as Stewart said on Fox News, I told Teresa, and don’t quote me on the exact number, but since 1937 there have been a hundred and thirty cases of documented intimidation by an organizer in a union drive having to do with having workers sign up for the union. In seventy some years. Last year there were thirty thousand cases of employer intimidation in organizing drives. [applause] In one year…[applause]

[emphasis added]

So, where does Roy Blunt’s point of view come from?:

EFCA’s Opponents Received Millions Upon Millions From Business PACs

…some of the legislation’s chief opponents in Congress have received millions upon millions of dollars from business interests over the course of their careers, and only a pittance from labor. This includes the top ranks of the Republican Party.

After the Employee Free Choice Act was introduced on Tuesday, Danny Diaz, a Republican operative working against the legislation’s passage, sent to reporters a compilation of quotes attacking the union-backed measure. Below are the names of the officials quoted with a list of the amount of money they’ve received from business and labor political action committees…

…To be sure, not all business groups are actively engaged in the EFCA fight. Some, though relatively few, are comfortable with the legislation’s passage. Moreover, there is a far deeper pool of business PACs willing to donate to politicians than labor ones. But this line of attack only adds to the notion that the business community is bringing more financial clout to the fight. Indeed, the Chamber of Commerce — the leading force behind killing EFCA in Congress — spent more on lobbying in 2008 than all labor unions combined…

[emphasis added]

Really? The Chamber of Commerce? “I’m shocked, shocked …”:

FRIENDS OF ROY BLUNT

…CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAC (US CHAMBER PAC) 06/19/2002 1000.00 22991453216

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAC (US CHAMBER PAC) 06/20/2007 1500.00 27990320144

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PAC (US CHAMBER PAC) 06/06/2008 1000.00 28991512681…

…NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 10/16/1997 500.00 97032512069

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 08/12/1998 1000.00 98033562339

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 11/04/1999 1000.00 99034960457

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 12/16/1999 1000.00 20035143891

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 05/11/2000 2000.00 20035673578

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 08/17/2000 1000.00 20036053894

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 09/17/2001 1000.00 21990532230

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 03/14/2002 2000.00 22990787105

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 05/29/2002 2000.00 22991138786

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 08/22/2002 1000.00 22991865347

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 10/04/2002 1000.00 22992452249

NATI
ONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 03/18/2003 1500.00 23990787772

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 09/16/2003 1000.00 23992201314

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 03/09/2004 2500.00 24990970475

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 08/05/2004 3000.00 24971475132

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 06/14/2005 2500.00 25970652801

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 03/23/2006 2500.00 26950084318

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS/ SAVE AMERICAS FREE ENTERPRISE TRUST 05/31/2007 2500.00 27931509728…

Huh, NFIB, good friends of Roy Blunt that they are, appear to be adamantly against EFCA, too. I wonder why?

Catholics Against Climate Change

22 Wednesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Today the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops hosted a conference call for reporters with several Catholic partner organizations to announce the Catholic Climate Covenant, which is the Catholic contribution to the debate on how we respond to the challenge of global warming.

One aspect of the effort is a much publicized St Francis Pledge to Care for Creation and the Poor, which is being distributed via media and educational packages to all 17,000 Catholic parishes in the United States.

From the press release:

In taking the St Francis Pledge to Care for Creation and the Poor, Catholics promise to:

·         PRAY and reflect on the duty to care for God’s creation and the poor and vulnerable;

·         LEARN about and educate others on both the reality of climate change and its moral dimensions;

·         ASSESS their participation-as individuals and organizations-in contributing to climate change (i.e. consumption and conservation);

·         ACT to change their choices and behaviors contributing to climate change and;

·         ADVOCATE Catholic principles and priorities in climate change discussions and decisions, especially as they impact the poor and vulnerable.

The idea is that Catholics who pray about the duty to protect God’s creation, which includes the environment and the poor, will then act upon it by learning more about the problem of climate change. Those who learn about climate change will be more likely to assess how they are contributing to the problem, and so on. With around 67 million members of the Catholic Church in the US, any significant proportion becomes a huge pool of activists.

The conference call itself was a coordinated lineup of representatives from a series of major Catholic organizations. Bishop William S. Skylstad, the former chair of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, spoke passionately of the call for Catholics to live up to this collective challenge, asking, “How does our Catholic community and our nation care for those most affected by impacts and remedies of climate change and reduce harmful behaviors impacting God’s gift of creation?”

Dr. Elaine Bauer, VP of the Catholic Health Association of the United States, pointed out that as the largest chain of non-profit hospitals in the country, not only do Catholic hospitals share much of the burden in responding to human suffering caused by extreme weather conditions and an increased disease vector brought on by climate change, but also a responsibility to change their own carbon footprint.

Bill O’Keefe of Catholic Relief Services and Kathy Brown of Catholic Charities both reiterated the points made elsewhere that the major share of suffering brought on by climate change will be (and already has been) borne by citizens of the poorest and least developed nations as well as the poorest here in the United States.

John Zogby did some polling on behalf of the umbrella group, and when the results are up, I’ll post them. He did say that 55 percent of the 1,001 Catholics polled between March 30 and April 14 believed global warming and climate change were serious problems. Also, 60 percent of respondents felt confident that climate change must be addressed immediately, that we know enough now to act. The most responsive subsample was apparently Hispanic Catholics. He also firmly believed that this was an issue that swung Catholics toward Obama and the Democratic Party in the last election.

I’ll be curious to see how this progresses. The House is considering legislation right now, and all members of Catholic Climate Covenant stressed that as a community they would be very involved in holding all elected leaders to account. But precisely what they would be holding them accountable for is not clear, as they offered no specifics on the call. They did stress repeatedly that they were concerned that much of the effort to stop climate change should involve alleviating the suffering of the poor, and that the faith community as a whole would find it difficult to support a bill that did not provide revenue streams for rebates on higher energy prices, for weatherizing homes and building energy efficient affordable housing, and employing people in poverty stricken communities as well as providing international adaptation funds. They did add that together with representatives of other faiths, they had met with Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Energy Committee, and he was very receptive and engaging on their concerns.

So again, I’m very interested to see how this all proceeds. I would like to see specifics down to the parish level to see if Catholics are both getting this message loud and clear and responding in a concerted effort. But I am hopeful. This is a very united US Catholic Church moving forward, not just some bishops with a strong point of view, and they in turn are responding in part to Pope Benedict XVI’s and his predecessor Pope John Paul II’s teachings on “creation care.”

Here’s the video that accompanies the launch of this campaign:

Parkinson's non-gambling slot machine bill defeated narrowly

22 Wednesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Mark Parkinson was a man with an idea. His bill HB 779 proposed allowing for people to own and operate non-antique private slot machines in their houses, for non-gambling purposes. As to who would want or need to do such a thing is unclear. Perhaps Rep. Parkinson is thinking towards the time when the sales of non-gambling slot machines can be prop up our sales tax revenues (until the day that such sales are exempted from the sales tax). Or perhaps Rep. Parkinson wanted to buy a slot machine that was made after 1979.

But when the time came for a vote in the House last night, Parkinson’s bill was defeated, by a vote of 139 to 16.

One could say that the stakes of what the bill sought, relative to the crushing defeat, is reflective of the success one would have while gambling on a slot machine anywhere.

Fight on Mark Parkinson! Fight to a better day when Missourians can operate shiny new slot machines in their dens without fear of breaking the law. A new day where Missourians operate their one-armed bandits not for the goal of monetary reward, but for the pure love of using a slot machine. It’s time we end the prohibition on non-antique non-gambling slot machines. It’s currently item #217 on my list of things that our state government needs to do. It’s that important.

Or we can at least legalize margarine or something.

Cap and Trade's Effect on Missouri

21 Tuesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Something fun that the League of Conservation Voters included in their release about the Blunt ad is a state-by-state analysis of the effect cap and trade would have on the US economy. Even more fun is that they ran the numbers through the National Association of Manufacturers’ high-cost estimate that conservatives tout as showing the ruinous effects of cap and trade on our economy. Even in this high cost scenario, Missouri would still have a huge increase in GDP and average income over the next 23 years:

Missouri Under Cap and Trade

It’s also worth noting that the industry-friendly study has a host of methodological problems that downplay the possibility of economic growth returned to the economy by cap and trade. For example, one of the reasons cap and trade is estimated to cost so much by the NAM study is that they foresee very little shift to clean and renewable sources of energy, forecasting only a total of 5 gigawatts of wind generating capacity by 2030. The problem with that estimate is that we had a 5.2 GW capacity already last year!

Naturally, if we put a cap and trade system in place and ratchet the cap down as planned, the fossil fuel systems we already have in place would cost a lot more in 20 years. And if we are still stuck with the same carbon emitting utilities we have now,  and no shift has been made, then it will cost more for no real reason. But the whole point of cap and trade is to shift ourselves to cleaner energy production and wiser consumption!  

Right now, the costs of burning fossil fuels are implicit in such disparate problems as rising ocean levels, more extreme weather emergencies, and asthma caused by coal emissions. But we don’t link those costs explicitly to how we generate and consume energy. I don’t think when I set my thermostat a couple of degrees higher that the increased electricity consumption will burn more coal that will release more carbon into the atmosphere which will keep us on a path of warming that will eventually melt more polar ice and raise the sea levels, flooding my hometown of Lake Charles, LA, 50 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (Which it will at this rate.)

A cap and trade system provides that explicit link (it costs producers and users money) and generates both incentives and revenues toward building a new system where we don’t have those same costs, either explicit or implicit. Cap-and-trade proposals call for giving some of the revenue to consumers, so if I have to pay a little extra on the electric bill every summer, I’ll start looking for ways to save on energy costs. When I get my cap-and-trade rebate, I can put it into insulation, caulking, more energy-efficient lightbulbs, and so on, lowering my bills and my carbon footprint. Energy producers will have to pay extra to burn coal or oil, so they will start looking for ways to reduce their costs, whether it’s from greater efficiency, investing in solar and wind and other forms of clean and renewable energy, or sequestering the carbon emissions.

Naturally, this shift will require investment right here in our communities, and that investment means jobs – jobs like weatherizing homes, installing solar panels on roofs, and building wind turbines. That effect isn’t measured in the NAM study, either. Instead, cap-and-trade is seen by them as a static drain on the economy. But to come full circle, as the LCV points out by the NAM study’s own assumptions, it’s not such a drain after all.

Wanna let our elected officials know we need healthcare reform?

21 Tuesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Well, here’s your chance progressive St. Louisans…

As we are gearing up for the fight to pass President Obama’s health reform agenda, progressives from around St. Louis will be coming to Forest Park Community College, for the Health Care Can’t Wait! townhall discussion.

For more info, follow me over the jump…

St. Louis ACORN, along with our event co-sponsors(Planned Parenthood, SEIU, UAW, CWA, PROMO, Metropolitan Congregations United, and many more progressive organizations) will hosting the Health Care Can’t Wait! townhall discussion at the Forest Park Community College Student Theatre, from 11am till Noon on Saturday.

Why should you show up?  Because we all know that President Obama and his progressive allies can’t make this happen, without grassroots support.  Already Republicans and conservative Democrats are taking aim at removing the option of buying into a public healthcare option, the cornerstone of any meaningful healthcare reform.  America’s healthcare delivery system is broken, and we can’t just keep trying minor tweaks and hoping that the duct tape keeping this country’s healthcare system together holds.  We need real change, real fast!

Across the country, people have been mobilizing in support of healthcare reform, with thousands coming out to these events in the month of April.  Now it’s St. Louis’ turn to show that we support meaningful healthcare reform.  So here are the details.

What:  Health Care Can’t Wait! Townhall Discussion

Featuring panelists(both consumers and providers) speaking about the need for real healthcare reform.

When:  Saturday, April 25th at 11am till Noon.

Where:  Forest Park Community College Student Theatre.

Why:  Because America’s healthcare system has failed, and we need to let our elected representatives know that we are demanding change!

Please RSVP by following this link:

http://healthcareforamericanow…

[poll id=”

44

“]

Sarah Steelman (r): a really spiffy website update

21 Tuesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2010, missouri, Sarah Steelman, Senate

Oh please, Sarah Steelman (r) is going to run for the U.S. Senate in 2010.

She’s got a slick new look to her website. And it has cool features, not to mention excellent quotes on the front page:

Truth

The enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth-persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. JFK

There’s nothing quite like reading quotes of Democratic Party icons on a “potential” republican candidate’s website. Is she planning to challenge Robin Carnahan for the Democratic Party nomination instead of Roy (r – lobbyists) in the republican primary? Just asking. What, no Harry Truman quotes?

The website has a section for a blog (with a few posts) and a forum. The blog is apparently reserved for campaign principals and doesn’t appear to allow comments. Forums are very nice campaign tools (and you can participate if you register as a user), but they demand intensive moderator attention and proactive action to keep trolls and other disruptive influences from destroying their effectiveness. It’ll be interesting to see if Sarah Steelman’s pseudo-populist rhetoric creates enough of a volunteer base to enable a sufficient number of community moderators (as opposed to paid campaign staff).

Interesting Article on Missouri GOP

21 Tuesday Apr 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Oh goody! There’s nothing I love more than a good in-fight! About time the Repub’s got into them instead of always us providing the entertainment.

Article in Politico today:

http://www.politico.com/news/s…

I agree that Steelman will be a more formidable candidate. Robin can still take her, but it will be by only about 15 percentage points rather than the 30 that she would take Blunt by.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: “NO” on Proposition A
  • Donald Trump’s (r) Russian Diesel
  • Campaign Finance: “…It’s the only way to be sure.”
  • Campaign Finance: all that right wingnut money, just to vilify a tiny minority
  • Campaign Finance: shifting into high gear

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance:… on Denny’s Dirty Ball
Campaign Finance:… on Justice Brett Kavanaugh…
Campaign Finance:… on HB 1: Gerrymander this
Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: Next
Campaign Finance: al… on Campaign Finance: Next

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,092,260 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...