I’ve received two more robocalls from “Citizens Taking Charge” (Of what? Mud?) attacking Sam Page, the Democratic Party candidate for Lt. Governor.
Our previous coverage:
Robocalls against Sam Page (D)
Here’s the first call:
Dr. Sam Page has the wrong prescription for Missouri’s children. Sam Page says he’s concerned about Missouri’s children, but it doesn’t show. Sam Page voted against background checks for foster parents, putting thousands of Missouri children at risk. Sam Page also voted to allow an investigation of child abuse to close if the child dies during the investigation. Sam Page’s choices are risky for Missouri. On November 4th say “No” to Sam Page. Paid for by Citizens Taking Charge, Patrick Wilson, treasurer.
The beginning of the next phone call was cut of by the answering machine:
…[sup]ports public education, but it doesn’t show. Sam Page voted against funding Missouri’s education budget eleven times. Sam Page voted against three hundred and twenty five million dollars in new funding for Missouri’s public schools. Sam Page’s choices are risky for Missouri. On November 4th say “No” to Sam Page. Paid for by Citizens Taking Charge, Patrick Wilson, treasurer.
Why, that’s enough to make you want you to take Sam Page out back and beat the crap out of him. At least that’s what they want voters to think.
We’ll have this kind of negative campaign tactics for as long as they work. We can do our part to make sure these tactics don’t work this election cycle. Get out and vote a straight Democratic Party ballot on November 4th (remember, you’ve got to mark the Democrat for each race since the republican controlled General Assembly got rid of the straight party check off on the ballot).
Sam Page’s campaign is answering Peter Kinder’s direct (non-surrogate) attacks in an e-mail to supporters:
…By now you may have seen or heard the attacks of my opponent, Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder. His negative advertisements confirm two facts we’ve known for some time 1) He’s behind in the polls 2) He doesn’t even recognize that a moral/ethical line exists.
Beginning a TV presence with negative advertising is a tell tale sign of an incumbent who’s behind. His distortions go beyond twisting the truth; they are just down right lies.
In one of his disgraceful attacks, my opponent says I voted to increase Medicaid reimbursements so I could make myself and my friends more wealthy. Those of us in the medical field know that no body makes money on Medicaid. Many medical practices serving Medicaid populations can hardly make ends meet and are in danger of having to close their doors.
In another, Lt. Gov. Kinder attacks me for voting against a bill that would have made it more difficult for the state to investigate cases of physical and sexual abuse against children. Twice in the media, he has attacked me for this, and twice third parties have provided verification that my position was right.
From the KY3 Political Blog: “In voting against house bills 679 and 396 in 2003, Sam Page was defending children in foster care,” says Lori Burns-Bucklew, attorney and member of the Kansas City Prevention Roundtable. “There were so many reasons to vote against this bill. For example, it required addresses of foster homes to be disclosed which put the foster kids’ safety in jeopardy, and it would have put children at risk by making it more difficult to prosecute cases of child abuse. Sam Page did the right thing,” she adds…
In defending this legislation, Lt. Gov. Kinder is saying he favors legislation to make it more difficult to investigate and prosecute cases of physical and sexual abuse against children. I’ve challenged Lt. Gov. Kinder to find one reputable child care advocate who agrees with his position.
The Kansas City Star Editorial Board also agreed with my position in 2003: In July, Holden vetoed the bill, which would make numerous changes in Missouri’s child-protection system. His reasons were sound: It would have limited the state’s power to supoena witnesses in abuse and neglect cases, taking away an important tool in finding out the truth. It would also have required law enforcement officials to videotape child witnesses. Experts say that could be frightening to the children and could discourage them from talking…
From Sam Page’s campaign:
anybody got an idea on how well they work?
I’m hearing that anti-Obama robocalls are coming into Missouri as well.
But by now.. the people who are swayable have to be really sick of phonecalls from any political person, much less a call from a recording. Isn’t that why the “false flag robocall” was unleashed in 2006 in FL and NH, and other places?
Bottom line, they don’t work. All legitimate research says so.
It is too bad that politicians continue to exempt themselves from Do Not Call law.
StopPoliticalCalls.org is fighting for the privacy of the American voter.
1 – Creating a Political Do Not Call Registry
2 – Testifying in the US Senate about robo calls (Sen. Feinstein’s Robocall Privacy Act)
3 – Forcing states to enforce existing robo call laws (CA, MN, NJ, etc..)
4 – Getting politicians to take a do not robo call pledge (7 have)
As I testified at the US. Senate these robo calls are an epidemic and this election cycle “phone spam” and are invading the privacy of All American Voters.
Our members are taking a stand and saying enough is enough at the National Political Do Not Contact Registry at StopPoliticalCalls.org.
Here is a quote from a member recently:
“I’m a shift worker, working variable shifts. I depend on my sleep to be able to do my job safely and efficiently. I’m a locomotive engineer. Imagine the disaster were I to fall asleep, operating a freight train carrying hazardous materials in your neighborhood, due to fatigue from being awoken in my middle of the night on a continuous basis during election season. Please stop..”
Learn more.
Shaun Dakin
CEO
http://www.stoppoliticalcalls.org
A non-profit fighting for the privacy of the American voter