• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: HJR 104

Sue Allen: No longer under the radar

03 Sunday Apr 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ALEC, campaign finance, corruption, earnings tax, HJR 104, Kurt Schaefer, Maryland v. Wynne, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Rex Sinquefield, Sue Allen

I first encountered GOP state Rep. Sue Allen a few years ago when, along with fellow GOP Reps. Cole McNary and Andrew Koenig, she “co-hosted,” a showing of the film, “Not evil, just wrong.” The film is a cleverly made compendium of many of the distortions and lies that have emanated from the climate change denialist right over the past few years. When I questioned some of its contentions in the Q & A session that followed, Allen became visibly annoyed and told me that this was an informational meeting for constituents and implied that I should shut-up if not get-out.  I explained that I was, in fact, a constituent of her co-host Andrew Koenig, and she retreated – without responding to my question – but visibly discombobulated. I refrained from asking her what she thought the word “constituent” meant.

I bring this up because the encounter helped form my impression of Allen who, a few years later, thanks to redistricting, became my representative in the people’s house of the state of Missouri. My image was of a crass Tea Party darling, willing to use intimidation and lies to sell the party-line. Imagine my surprise when Allen’s frequent email Capitol Reports rarely presented me with anything more controversial than accounts of visits from girl scouts to the capital or  descriptions of neutral legislative initiatives. Or if they weren’t neutral they were consistently  described as if they were. For instance, she recently noted that the House continued to work on “voter fraud”  – but she left it at that, not a word about the contentious hearings on the matter, while the crucial words “voter ID’ were nowhere to be found. Her conservative colors do show through, but any hint of the GOP radicalism that has been on display in the lege over the past few years has only rarely surfaced.

My impression that Allen was one of those blood-red-state types trying to pose as a less threatening soft pink was reinforced when I learned that she was one of three Missouri lawmakers identified by the Missouri Ethics Commission for being lavishly wined and dined by corporate lobbyists “with interests before the General Assembly” during a 2014 American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) junket in Dallas. At issue were efforts to hide the identity of the three recipients of the lobbyist largesse in subsequent mandatory reports. It wasn’t just the hint of corruption that hit home , but the fact that keeping the hardcore stuff under the radar, a longtime hallmark of ALEC and its legislative acolytes, also seemed to be Allen’s modus operandi.

Allen’s latest Capital Report (3/31), however, does attempt to deal openly if not very  honestly with a controversial issue: a bill filed by Allen, HJR 104, which would allow the entire state to vote on a purely municipal issue, abolishing city earnings taxes. Allen’s bill calls for a constitutional amendment which  would go directly to the state’s voters, bypassing the Governor’s desk and his potential veto.

I suspect that this move resulted in lots of unwelcome publicity for Allen.  Which is not surprising: when asked why she filed the bill, she responded that “the measure ‘is not something I’m spending a lot of time on so I’d rather you not address this with me’ […] Additionally, she said she filed the bill because someone asked her to, but she would not identify the individual who did so.” Might excite a little constituent outrage perhaps?

Allen’s newsletter screed seems desperate to justify this favor for an unnamed beneficiary. And what better excuse than the Constitution, as represented in a Supreme Court ruling in Maryland v. Wynne (May 1915) .  The ruling found that “disallowing local income tax credit for taxes paid in other states is unconstitutional.”  Or, as Allen put it:

House Joint Resolution 104 calls for a state-wide vote on requiring the earnings tax to be replaced by January 1, 2030 or 14 years. A recent Supreme Court ruling could require both Kansas City and St. Louis to give up large portions of their revenues, as gathered by the earnings taxes, in credits to other states. In addition, there could potentially be a requirement to refund millions to those taxed under this system. If either of these scenarios happen, both cities will have an immediate, large reduction in revenue with no apparent plan in place to replace the earnings tax. HJR 104 provides up to 14 years for a reasonable replacement plan to be put in place. This resolution is a proactive step toward lessening the potential impact a ruling from the Supreme Court could inflict on St. Louis revenues and will give local governments and voter’s time to come up with REAL solutions.

In the recent case of Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an individual’s resident state cannot tax an income without ensuring that income is not being double taxed. Currently, St. Louis does not give ANY tax credits for taxes paid to other areas which can result in taxes being levied from two authorities on the same income, which is unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution’s commerce clause. For example, if you live in St. Louis but work in Illinois, your income could be taxed by Illinois and Missouri under the current law.

It is not actually true that, as Allen claims above, the ruling would “require both Kansas City and St. Louis to give up large portions of their revenues, as gathered by the earnings taxes, in credits to other states.” The Wynne ruling is complex, but the gist seems to be that there must be an accommodation that conforms to tests of internal and external consistency vis-a-vis interstate commerce to avoid double taxation on personal income subject to taxation in more than one jurisdiction. Both cities believe that they meet the tests.

Kansas City actually has a credit arrangement with  Kansas that ensures its compliance with the ruling – which probably  accounts for the fact that it was recently removed from Senator Kurt Schaefer’s (R-19) legislation to abolish Missouri earnings taxes. Nor is St. Louis Mayor Slay concerned by the constitutional issues; as he explained to  the members of the House, St. Louis passed a law in February that brought them into compliance with  Wynne – I guess Allen wasn’t at work that day. As far as residents of other Missouri jurisdictions, such as St. Louis County who work in St. Louis and pay  taxes there, I notice that the Missouri tax code allows them to deduct earning taxes if they so choose.

The constitutional argument belatedly pushed front and center by Senator Kurt Schaeffer (R-19) and, most recently, by Sue Allen, isn’t likely to hold water. An article published in the Pitch last January observed:

Schaefer’s argument about the constitutionality of the tax is a new tactic for him. He didn’t raise constitutional questions last summer, when he first broached the idea of ridding Kansas City and St. Louis of the earnings tax. Rather, he proposed the move as a punitive measure for those cities seeking to increase their minimum wage beyond the state-proscribed $7.65 an hour. In a June 12 letter to his colleagues, Schaefer proposed eliminating the earnings tax as a means of giving money back to employers and employees.

Along with punishing cities that don’t go along with GOP orthodoxy, there is very convincing speculation that big gifts from billionaire Rex Sinquefield, who has fought long and hard to eliminate the earnings tax, may explain some of Schaefer’s animus. Sinquefield made a direct gift of $750,000 to support of Schaefer’s candidacy for Attorney  General – along with”thousands more indirectly from Sinquefield through Grow Missouri, a free-economy political action committee that is funded in large part by Sinquefield.”

Which brings us back to Sue Allen.  Remember the unnamed individual who asked her to file a bill that would let rabidly conservative out-staters vote on St. Louis’ earnings tax?  Wonder who she’s so eager to do favors for? Guess what? According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “since December 2014, Allen has received $4,500 from Grow Missouri, a Sinquefield-backed group.”

So what can we infer from all this? When it comes to legislative “favors,” one hand greases the other, as they say. And although Allen herself is term-limited and will leave the legislature, her husband, Mike Allen, plans to run for her seat. It’s always worthwhile to keep those family hands well-greased and if it gets out that you have a taste for the oily stuff, if you possibly can, putting a constitutional label on  your grease pot will hide a multitude of sins.

Slightly edited for clarity.

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Democratic Party News
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Josh Hawley
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 392,235 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.