• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Grifters

Always Be Grifting

11 Tuesday Nov 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Eric Schmitt, Josh Hawley, US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

cloture vote, Eric Schmitt, Grifters, grifting, Josh Hawley, missouri, right wingnuts, Trump shutdown, Trump sycophants, U.S. Senate, WTF?

‪Ben Penn‬ ‪@benjaminpenn.bsky.social‬

Buried inside the deal to reopen government is a provision that would give Senators private right of action to sue for millions in damages over their phone records being analyzed by Jack Smith’s team.
[….]
November 10, 2025 at 2:20 PM

Josh Hawley (r) [2024 file photo].

Eric Schmitt (r) [2025 file photo].

Yesterday:

Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R. 5371, As Amended)
Vote Number: 618 Vote Date: November 10, 2025, 08:58 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2V ote Result: Bill Passed
Measure Number: H.R. 5371 (A bill making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2026, and for other purposes.)
Measure Title: A bill making continuing appropriations and extensions for fiscal year 2026, and for other purposes.
Vote Counts:
YEAs 60
NAY s40

[….]

Hawley (R-MO), Yea

Schmitt (R-MO), Yea

[emphasis added]

What they voted for on Monday:

H.R.5371 – Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026

[….]

Requiring Senate Notification for Disclosure of Senate Data

[….]

(B) ALL OTHER INVESTIGATIONS.—For any investigation in which a Senator is not a target of a criminal investigation, the notice requirements under this subsection shall apply without delay.

(d) Private cause of action.—

(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:

(A) INSTANCE.—The term ‘instance’, with respect to a violation of this section, means each discrete act constituting a violation of this section, including each individual—

(i) device, account, record, or communication channel subject to collection in a manner in violation of this section;

(ii) nondisclosure order or judicial sealing order sought, maintained, or obtained; or

(iii) search conducted.

(B) VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION.—The term ‘violation of this section’ means—

(i) the seeking, maintaining, or obtaining of a nondisclosure order or judicial sealing order to prevent notification of a Senator, a Senate office, or the Office of the SAA as required under subsection (c); or

(ii) Senate data was acquired, subpoenaed, searched, accessed, or disclosed pursuant to a search, seizure, or demand for information without notice being provided as required under subsection (c).

(2) CAUSE OF ACTION.—Any Senator whose Senate data, or the Senate data of whose Senate office, has been acquired, subpoenaed, searched, accessed, or disclosed in violation of this section may bring a civil action against the United States if the violation was committed by an officer, employee, or agent of the United States or of any Federal department or agency.

(3) RELIEF.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—If a Senator prevails on a claim under this subsection, the court shall award—

(i) for each instance of a violation of this section, the greater of statutory damages of $500,000 or the amount of actual damages;

(ii) reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of litigation; and

(iii) such injunctive or declaratory relief as may be appropriate.

(B) PRELIMINARY RELIEF.—Upon motion by a Senator, a court may award such preliminary injunctive relief as the court determines appropriate with respect to a claim under this subsection.

(4) LIMITATIONS AND IMMUNITY.—

(A) PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS.—A civil action under this subsection may not be commenced later than 5 years after the applicable Senator first obtains actual notice of the violation of this section.

(B) NO IMMUNITY DEFENSE.—No officer, employee, or agent of the United States or of any Federal department or agency shall be entitled to assert any form of absolute or qualified immunity as a defense to liability under this subsection.

(5) WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.—The United States expressly waives sovereign immunity with respect to actions brought under this subsection.

(6) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE FOR TARGET INVESTIGATIONS.—It shall be an affirmative defense to an action under this subsection if the United States establishes that each of the following requirements are met:

(A) At the time the Senate data was acquired, subpoenaed, searched, accessed, or disclosed, the Senator bringing the action was a target of a criminal investigation.

(B) A Federal judge issued an order authorizing a delay of notice to the Senator under subsection (c)(3)(A), based on written findings meeting the requirements of such subsection.

(C) The United States complied with the order described in subparagraph (B), including that the delay of notice did not exceed the period authorized by the court.

(D) Any related subpoena of, warrant relating to, or access to Senate data was carried out strictly within the temporal and subject-matter scope authorized by the order, if any, authorizing the subpoena, warrant, or access.

(7) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to—

(A) limit or impair the constitutional protections afforded to Members of Congress, including to protections under article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States (commonly known as the ‘Speech or Debate Clause’); or

(B) restrict the authority of the Senate or any Senate office to intervene in or defend against any legal process seeking disclosure of Senate data.”.

(b) Limited retroactive applicability.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to any acquisition, subpoena, search, accessing, or disclosure of Senate data (as defined in section 10(a) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005 (2 U.S.C. 6628(a)), as amended by this section), and to any failure to disclose such an acquisition, subpoena, search, accessing, or disclosure, occurring on or after January 1, 2022.

(2) PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS.—

(A) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term “violation of section 10” has the meaning given the term “violation of this section” in subsection (d) of section 10 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005 (2 U.S.C. 6628), as added by this section.

(B) PERIOD.—With respect to any violation of section 10 with respect to which the applicable Senator first obtained actual notice of the violation of section 10 before the date of enactment of this Act, a civil action under subsection (d) of section 10 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005 (2 U.S.C. 6628), as added by this section, may not be commenced later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

This division may be cited as the “Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026”.

[….]

[emphasis added]

“…If a Senator prevails on a claim under this subsection, the court shall award— (i) for each instance of a violation of this section, the greater of statutory damages of $500,000 or the amount of actual damages…”

“Clean Continuing Resolution” my ass.

Getting schooled

13 Tuesday May 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Eric Schmitt, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

defunding public education, Eric Schmitt, Fascist pig, grift, Grifters, missouri, right wingnut, social media

Eric Schmitt (r) [2024 file photo].

Yesterday:

Eric Schmitt
[May 12, 2025]
Senator Eric Schmitt
[May 12, 2025]
Every child, no matter their background or zip code, deserves a quality education.
Passing the Educational Choice for Children Act will help make school choice a reality for kids across America.
[….]

Some of the responses:

Eric Schmitt, yet Missouri (like other Red states) has been consistently ranked among the worst in education. What have you done in your career to help with that? Not a damn thing.

School choice has been proven NOT to provide quality education for all children. Just the opposite. Those who already could afford private education pay less. The rest of the children get left behind.

vouchers and school choice do not make education accessible for all
It takes money away from public schools, and makes private schools more accessible to the rich.
What happens to all of the other kids who not only do not benefit from vouchers but who now have even worse public school systems?
Or do we just not care about them?

the rich can already afford private school, choice allows lower income folks to attend private school

look at the research. School choice time and time again benefits the rich, not those who truly need it.

Families have always had a choice of where to send their children to school. Stop trying to dismantle public education.

Yup cuz the rich kids need a coupon.

Hmmmmmm if only there were… schools… in every community… like, community schools! And they were… hmmmm…. Funded?!! Wow! I think you’re on to something here… a series of schools funded by the government and managed by, oh, we’ll call it “the department of education” —— yeah. I agree! Let’s fund our community schools and ensure they’re high quality!!

No, it’s not about funding. Schools that spend more do so because they need to make up for poor living situations. These same schools struggle with performance because these students have more challenging home lives.
Zip code is the most closely correlated determinant of academic performance. Secure home lives and involved parents determine performance above all else.
This is why private schools can often appear to perform better. It’s self selecting. By the way, private schools have to requirement to admit marginal students, so any comparison to public schools are poor by design.

[….] Selection bias skews averages because private schools don’t keep poor students. The don’t take disabled students.
Compare income adjusted demographics and performance is the same.

if we know that the root of academic performance is family life how do we repair this so that students may benefit? I personally think universal healthcare is a start.

Bingo!

Eric, this legislation accelerates the undermining and destruction of the public school systems.

He considers that a feature, not a bug.

Not about choice…..gutting public education….too democratic…..funnel public funds to private schools run by religious organizations or their billionaire oligarchs…..to rich people who already can afford to send their children to private school……which can pick and choose…..what happens to children with IEPs? All laid out in Project 2025….written by white Christian Nationalist and those in Opus Dei. [….]

This is just a subsidy for parents who would already likely send their kids to a private school. Now they just get to do it on the taxpayers’ dime while resources are being diverted from already underfunded poor public schools. Another grift by those who think they are smarter than the rest of us.

everyone’s taxes go to public education. It’s a vested interest of the entire community to have an educated public.

yeah…people say that, but it’s simplistic and somewhat misleading. US middle class students do just as well as other middle class students in most other industrialized nations. That’s actually impressive considering US kids spend less days in a classroom. But US public education has notably higher rates of poverty than most other countries. Furthermore, because of the backwards way the US funds education, students in poverty tend to actually have less funding than middle class students. So if you factor in poverty, thr US holds its own.

The establishment of a free public education was never about your personal children. It was to create a society in which the electorate and future employees could help make society as a whole more cohesive and prosperous for all. That is why those without children, elderly people whose children are grown and many others still are required to pay. It is about supporting the type of communities we want to live in. If you choose to pay for another type of education for your children, that is certainly your right, but it doesn’t absolve you of helping pay for a benefit that supports your entire community.

School choice has failed in every US state that has attempted it. Pass.

I’d say let us vote on it, but we’ve seen how that played out to “give it to the states.”
Voted for abortion rights, we spent the entire legislative session fighting against all the bills republicans were trying to pass to overturn the will of the voters.
We voted for workers rights and guess what… republicans spent the entire session trying to scrub the vote saying the language on the ballot was illegal and the voters were confused about what they were voting for.
Education vouchers have been overwhelmingly unpopular in every state trying to force it onto its citizens. Any politician who pushes this is a sell out to private schools and their interests.
Who from Herzog is funding your campaign for reelection? Follow the money and I bet there’s a tie in there somewhere.

Nice word salad to cover up the REAL reason.

My tax dollars should go to only public schools…………not private institutions, especially not those related to religious ones.
PS: Why aren’t you worried about lack of health care and Head Start instead?

No, public dollars are not divided up into who goes to what school. There are many childless folks that pay into the taxing system to help pay for public education. We are some of them.
Do I vote yes on every school levy? I do, because I know investing in our children is important, and previous generations invested in me! But if public schools are not ‘good’ enough for your kids………..then you pay for the privilege of sending them to private schools, but don’t ask me to spend my money to do so. Especially not religious-based private schools.

I couldn’t imagine being as big a coward as you are.

Hey Eric? What say you about the Melon Felon trying to accept a $300 MILLION gift from Qatar? Do you have any spine at all to stand up against this nonsense?

Multiple news reports say it’s $400 million.

Personally, I’d like to take this to the next level and have vouchers from community parks so some people can subsidize sending their kids to private country clubs.

We see what you did there.

This right here is bullshit. Public money, public schools. Private schools are fine, that is your choice. “Universal”?
I thought Repugs were all for states handling their business? Well MO is an R state and they just gave private schools 50 million taxpayer dollars. How much more do they freaking need to pick the kids they want to play sports?

MASA. Make Americans Stupid Again.

Risky and Reckless.

Recent Posts

  • Fascist gotta Fascist
  • Foul.
  • ICE Whistles
  • Neunundneunzig Luftballons
  • Never attribute to malice what can be explained by actual gross incompetence

Recent Comments

kaboyates on Foul.
Laurie A. Ward, MA,… on Joseph R. McCarthy (r) just ca…
No ICE – Warre… on No ICE – Warrensburg, Mi…
kaboyates on Apparently, ‘Triumph des…
Campaign Finance: we… on Campaign Finance: trying to ke…

Archives

  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,029,650 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...