• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: ballot initiatives

Poor, poor pitiful me

29 Monday Jan 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

21st Senate District, ballot initiatives, cult of the victim, Denny Hoskins, FAFO, General Assembly, missouri, obstructionist, right wingnut, whining

Where ya gonna park your car?

Denny Hoskins (r) [2022 file photo].

Spin, via email addressed to constituents, from Denny Hoskins (r):

Greetings! Adversity comes before every great victory, and that is never truer than as someone working within the Missouri Senate.

This week I was met with bitter news. I was unexpectedly removed as the Chair for the Committee on Economic Development and Tax Policy during a press conference held on Jan. 23, 2024. I was also removed from the Appropriations Committee. From what I understand this was not due to a failure to fulfill my duties as a chair or committee member. Rather, it seems to relate to the use of certain strategies used on the Senate Floor to pass initiative petition (IP) reform. It also comes after I voted alone against Senate Bill 748, which extends Missouri’s law relating to the federal reimbursement allowance (FRA).

Removing a senator from their position as chair hasn’t occurred during session in over a decade, and it is completely unheard of in our Senate’s history for a group of senators to lose their positions as committee chairs all at once. In a more comical development, they also moved my parking spot further away. I’ve heard leadership discussed removing my office furniture as well. Unfortunately, you can’t make this stuff up folks.

On top of that, these decisions were made without any attempts to compromise or discuss solutions directly with me, and I can’t help but feel it is a punitive action meant to try and silence me as I work to bring my conservative ideals, and the ideals of my constituents, to the forefront of the discussion on the Senate Floor.

Despite this, I will remain steadfast in pushing for the immediate discussion and passing of IP reform on the Senate floor. IP reform is a priority of conservatives throughout the state and I will do everything in my power to make sure it is a priority here in the Senate Chamber. We cannot wait until the last day of session to pass IP reform like we have previously.

I hope to open negotiations with my colleagues to help us all move forward in our work.

[….]

“…certain strategies…”

Translation: “reactionary obstruction”

“…In a more comical development, they also moved my parking spot further away. I’ve heard leadership discussed removing my office furniture as well. Unfortunately, you can’t make this stuff up folks….”

This is done all the time in Jefferson City.

The cult of the victim.

Sure. The goal of curtailing and effectively eliminating initiative petitions for Missouri citizens by using obstructionist tactics is just so democratic. The irony escapes Denny Hoskins (r).

“…I hope to open negotiations with my colleagues to help us all move forward in our work…”

Sure. The republicans have controlled the General Assembly for over twenty years. What gives anyone the impression that they’ll change the way they do business any time soon, if ever?

What a clown show.

Previously:

Elect republican clowns, expect a republican circus (January 27, 2024)

Try caning first (January 27, 2024)

Ashcroft the Ballot Bully

12 Sunday Nov 2023

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Missouri Governor

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2024 Missouri Governor's Race, 2024 Missouri Republican Governor's Race, abortion rights, ballot initiatives, Jay Ashcroft, Missouri Abortion Legislation, Missouri Constitutional Amendments, Missouri Republicans, Missouri Secretary of State, reproductive freedom, reproductive rights, Roe v Wade

MO-GOP’s Contempt for ‘We the People’

11 Saturday Mar 2023

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Missouri General Assembly

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ballot initiatives, CLEAN Missouri, Missouri Constitution, Missouri Constitutional Amendments, Missouri Legislative Session, Missouri Legislature, Missouri Republican Party

Josh Hawley: Not as smart as they thought?

16 Thursday Aug 2018

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ballot initiatives, Claire McCaskill, Clean Elections, Election 2018, Gas tax, Josh Hawley, medical marijuana, Minimum wage, Redistricting

So what about Josh Hawley? There’s this little morsel (as noted by Michael Bersin here) which indicates that perhaps the guy just isn’t working with all the lights burning:

In Missouri’s U.S. Senate race, Josh Hawley (R) slammed Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) this morning for “hiding out” in Washington, D.C. For the record, the Senate is in session, which means McCaskill just went to work.

One twitter commentator suggested that Hawley might need a tutorial on how government works. In fact, lots of folks have been wondering this summer if Hawley’s really up to speed when it comes to “work,” and “politics” stuff – an impression that this post-primary awkwardness reinforces. Perhaps a tutorial would be just the thing.

Want more evidence that our hero is a little slower on the uptake than we’d expect from a Yale and Stanford graduate? How about Hawlely’s inability to let us know what he thinks about major issues in Missouri politics like the ballot initiatives that will come before the voters this November: we’ll vote on a higher minimum wage, clean government measures, including fair redistricting reform, increases to the gas tax to pay for sorely needed infrastructure improvements, and legalization of medical marijuana.

“Yes” or “no” stuff for any thinking politician, right? But Hawley seems to be a little worried that he might get somebody’s dander up if he expresses a real opinion on possibly controversial topics, which may be why he’s so willing to temporize. He declares that:

… he needs to read through all of the proposals and is still making up his mind. He said he’s inclined to support medical marijuana, but he said he wants to make sure there are enough protections to limit it to medical uses.

We’ve known that these initiatives would probably be on the ballot for some time – and even if we hadn’t, each of them is important enough, and most have been swirling around in the national conversation with such force, that we should be able expect a serious candidate for statewide office to have well-thought out opinions.

Senator McCaskill, I notice, is able to discuss the propositions straightforwardly without obfuscation or withdrawing into a shuddering heap. What we get are clear cut answers about what she believes will work best for Missourians. She likes all the propositions – expressing serious enthusiasm about clean government measures, something that all ethical politicians should be able to endorse. She even approves of the gas tax – a position that takes courage in these days when a sizeable section of the electorate has been brain-washed to think that you don’t have to pay for what you get – or that the other guy doesn’t deserve what you get.

There is one aspect of the questions raised by the ballot propositions that Hawley is willing to commit to. Our prim, proper and very religious AG is pretty clear that no one should be able to toke up who isn’t suffering from an agonizing or terminal disease. Easy-peasy decision if you’ve got your priorities straight.

Could the GOP love affair with Right to Work backfire in Missouri?

02 Monday Sep 2013

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ALRC, American Legislative Education Committee, ballot initiatives, Bill Otto, missouri, MOPAG, Peter Kinder, Right to work, RTW, Tim Jones, Unions

It’s no secret that the American Legislative Education Committee (ALEC), the corporatist front group owned in large part by the billionaire Koch brothers and used to enact their political preferences into law, is really big on right-to-work (RTW) legislation. ALEC is not alone in promoting RTW – the Chamber of Commerce; ALEC’s sister organization, Americans for Prosperity (AFP); along with numerous rightwing groups have also made RTW their cause du jour, but ALEC has had a particularly important role. In fact, several past efforts to enact RTW bills in Missouri adhered closely to he pattern of ALEC model legislation. Those bills – so far – have failed to gain sufficient traction to pass.

But never fear – RTW is still a priority. House speaker, Tim Jones recently, proclaimed that “we’re going to make Missouri the 25th right-to-work state.” The only thing that has changed is the strategy, as Peter Kinder explained to the ALEC overlords last month:

Earlier this month, Republican Lt. Governor Peter Kinder told an audience at the national American Legislative Exchange Council convention in Chicago that “Right to Work” (RTW) didn’t have the legs to pass through Missouri’s Republican-controlled legislature, and that the matter would likely be placed on the ballot for the next general election.

Sounds grim. RTW is not just one more effort to chip away at the ability of unions to function effectively, it’s a chain saw that can be used to slice away huge chunks of union membership.The word is that Missouri unions are already building up their war chests in anticipation of a nasty fight:

The 1978 fight pales in comparison to what the fight would cost both sides now,” Missouri AFL-CIO President, Hugh McVey, told The Missouri Times. “We won big last time and the numbers kind of speak to that, but I don’t know that we’d win like that this time. Although I do still think we would win.”

At a meeting of the Missouri Progressive Action Group (MOPAG) last Saturday, however, Democratic Rep. Bill Otto had a different perspective, all but daring the Republicans to put RTW on the ballot. His argument touched on the issue of turnout during midterm elections. Many of us believe that the reason Missouri sent such a large population of Tea Party fence posts (as in “dumb as a fence post”) to Washington in 2010, and voted for things like the anti-Obamacare Prop. C had more to do with small overall turnout and over-excited Tea Partiers than the real druthers of less extreme Missourians. One thing a RTW ballot initiative could do, if state Democrats are able to act quickly and smartly – a big if, I know – would be to energize the Democratic base. I don’t know about you, but I’ll wait and see. I’ll also keep my fingers crossed.  

Joe Trippi in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts! – part 3

09 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ballot initiatives, Joe Maxwell, Joe Trippi, missouri, Your Vote Counts!

“…I believe that anybody who looks at our country over its long illustrious history and Missouri’s history who doesn’t think that there has been a slow steady erosion of people’s voices, I mean the average person’s voice, in our government and the way we do things today, um, and this is just another, overturning what we put on the ballot, is just another step in silencing our, you know, what, our voice about what we want…”

Joe Trippi (left) and former Lieutenant Governor Joe Maxwell (D) (right) in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts!

Blue Girl and I had the opportunity to sit down for a conversation with Joe Trippi and former Missouri Lieutenant Governor Joe Maxwell (D) in Kansas City Wednesday morning about the ballot initiative addressing the Missouri General Assembly’s propensity to overturn the results of ballot initiatives.

Previously:

Joe Trippi in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts!

Joe Trippi in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts! – part 2

The final portion of the transcript:

…Joe Trippi: …and we can get into that [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: But then you’d have arguments in Missouri that’s an oxymoron. [inaudible crosstalk]

Joe Trippi: …but then you’d have to ask, ’cause, that’s what I’m saying. No, that’s my point. Then you have to argue whether, it’s like a, the argument that, uh, hey, you know, our elections, uh, you know, there’s a presumption that, that elections are, are, you know, are, are fair and, and, you know, [inaudible]. There’s also, you, you’d like to make the presumption that the legislature actually are thinking adults who don’t, who aren’t influenced by how much money an interest group [crosstalk] will give.

Show Me Progress: Or, or  they’re, they’re  trying to solve a problem [crosstalk][inaudible]…

…Joe Trippi: There’s nothing [crosstalk, yeah, they’re pure, they’re very pure. Yeah, that system’s really pure. I mean, that’s what I’m saying. So, you know, look, there, there’s not like there’s any perfect way to do it. But I think the more citizens are participating in, the more citizens have a say and the, and the harder it is. The easier it is for citizens to participate and the harder it is for legislators to undo what citizens, when citizens voice things in initiative the better the pro, the better  we’ll, we’ll be then the system we’ve got now which is the legislature doesn’t do what it needs to do and then when we take action they say, oh, you idiots, you don’t know what you’re talking about. We think you’re wrong. And that, it was a mistake [crosstalk] and, you know…

Show Me Progress: Yeah, and, and it’s been interesting for me, the, the idea of the citizen participation as, as, as we’ve been doing this for the past couple of years watching this. It’s, it’s almost scary that, um, you know in two thousand ten to see the, the drop in people who were, were participating. [inaudible] Because I think there is a fear, two thousand twelve, of not, not sustaining the kinds of interest that we saw in two thousand eight. [crosstalk]

Joe Trippi: No, that’s definitely in the [inaudible].

Show Me Progress: And it has, and it has a huge impact.

Joe Trippi: No, that, that’s what I’m saying, so that’s like, you know, let’s keep cutting off, making it tougher. Hey, you guys pass something, we’re outta here, you wasted all your time. That was anybody who carried those petitions, anybody who knocked on any doors, anybody sent twenty-five bucks in. [voice: “Yeah.”] You wasted it. It was a waste, ’cause us guys up in Jeff City said, you were wrong. Well that’s a great message to send to people about what, why they should be active in politics. That’s, I mean, that’s why, you know, I’m for this thing. I mean, I think we need to buttress and make strong the foundation where American people and Missouri, people of Missouri can participate, can, uh, have more of a say. And we’d probably be a lot better off, um, you know, if we had some sort of system where you could do that, get, you know, where they had more of a say directly in Washington, too. But, you know, that’s, that’s a dif, different [crosstalk], different day.

Show Me Progress: And, and, and there’s some ironies in the thing. The carry conceal, uh, initiative was in ninety-nine, am I right about that. Do I remember that? [voice: “Ninety-eight.”] Ninety-eight. Ninety-eight. ‘Cause I remember being in Jefferson City and, and [Senator] Harold Caskey [voice: “Yep.”] , uh, with, with that. Uh, what I remember about that was that the NRA started throwing huge amounts of money in that election. And what they did was, that people started to wake up about what was going on. And what actually happened is it boosted voter turnout. And I think the irony is, the way I looked at it, is if they would have kept quiet it would have passed. And, and they spent millions and people started going, wait a minute, we don’t want that. And, and what happened was it, it went down to defeat. So there, uh, sometimes the Missouri voters are…

Voice: But just for, just for a little bit of clarification, the conceal carry was not an, an initiative. The citizens didn’t put it on the ballot. [crosstalk] The legislature did. It’s a different term [inaudible].

Show Me Progress: Right. I understand that. [crosstalk] But, it was, it was a ballot [voice: “Right.”] issue. Right.

Voice: But that’s something that we do point at because the voters made it very clear how they felt about conceal carry [voce: “Right.”] and the legislature still went against them. So there are examples of even, not the, necessarily, or overturning initiatives that citizens put on the ballot, but there are a lot of examples like that [crosstalk] where the citizens have voted on and then they just say I don’t, still don’t care about what you say.

Show Me Progress: Things which are already [crosstalk] voted,  decided on. [crosstalk] Yeah.

Former Lieutenant Governor Joe Maxwell (D): In two thousand eight we passed Prop C for the [inaudible] requirement. I worked on that for renewable energy standards. We worked then, after that passed, almost two years getting rules adopted. And finally get the rules and then the legislature guts the whole thing this year in about thirty minutes. And I went around, we had four public deals, you know, trying to explain to all our supporters, you know, yeah, we worked for three years, raised all this money, God love ya for knockin’ on doors and getting signatures, and overwhelming number of people just like [inaudible], you know, they just said, it does no good. You know, I mean, they are just devastated that they, they got engaged and excited in the process. And, yeah, we turned, you know, the legislature, voters just turn off. It, it just, it’s terrible that, uh, they just totally disrespect it.

Show Me Progress: And, and some of this is, you know, the people that get involved in those kind of things, is we see, is they’re, you know, they’re activists, the core, they believe , you know, the core activists, they believe in something and want to get something done, they want to solve a problem, they want to do the right thing. And it takes the wind out of their sails, uh, but sometimes it’s like, you know, how do we, the people that reverse that in the General Assembly, how do we hold them accountable? You know, get, channel people
, and say, well, your state representative in your district, your district voted overwhelmingly to support this thing and, and your state representative voted to overturn it. And there’s a disconnect. [voice: “Yes, sir.”] And, you know, the, the other thing is, how do you inform people that, you’ve, you know, you put your heart and soul in this, your people in this district wanted this overwhelmingly, and there are districts in this state that are that way. [voice: “That’s correct.”] In, in several of these. And, and yet they keep reelecting these same people to the General Assembly. And there’s a disconnect.

Joe Trippi: But see, I think, you know, I think part of this is, uh, I think if you had a real, uh, protection of participatory Democracy in terms of when people do this you start to have those people stay in place. I mean, other words, once you, you know, you get something on the ballot and you pass it and now it takes seventy-five percent, you know, and they, and they have that success. And, and they, you know, it, you know, I think it’s tough, when the legislature, the legislature at seventy-five percent throws it out that organiz, that group of people stay, gets I think sort of, it, it makes it easier to connect that they just, I mean, they really just undid for x interest group what we all just did. And that organization can stay on the ground, actually start to impact some of the elect, you know, some of the, the candidate elections that are going on either way. Um, uh, so, you know, in the end, look, there’s, there’s gonna be, there’re, there’re enough flaws in Jeff City or in this process, that process, in the end I, I think the more we’re involved, the more people are involved, I’ll take whatever flaws come out of that. I mean, it, they’re gonna be some [crosstalk], um, but…

Show Me Progress:There, there will always, somebody will always find a way to exploit something.

Joe Trippi: Yeah. And [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: If you’re, if you’re doing it with, uh, um, good, good will and good intention, you know, it, it tends to be okay.

Joe Trippi: Well, you know, I put it this way, if you’re an interest group, uh, you’re an interest group and, you know, is it, you know, which would you rather have the interest group have to try to do, persuade half of a small group in Jeff City behind closed doors with a check book, uh, about your view, uh, or a majority of people who turn out, Missourians who turn out in [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: Decide, who, who is gonna show up on election day.

Joe Trippi: …gonna show up on election day. You have to convince them of your point of view. You may have to spend a lot of money to do that and you may even win it doing it. I’m not, but, which would we actually rather have them have to do? I mean, assuming something, they’re gonna do something untoward, it’s gonna hurt working people or, [voice: “Yeah.”] right? Which, they, they’re gonna have [crosstalk] to fool…

Show Me Progress: Which is about everything today.

Joe Trippi: No, no, but they’re gonna have to fool half of the state into doing it. [crosstalk]  Um, versus…

Show Me Progress: Yeah, you might as well, you might as well make them fool half the state.

Joe Trippi: Yeah, or, or we can let ’em fool, or, not fool, knowingly [laugh], you know, uh, uh, work Jeff City to get, to get half the vote there and, uh, you know, you know, and, which is that, which makes sense to the average person? Well, I mean, I, I think it’s pretty clear. I trust, I’d rather have them have to fool all of us than, uh, than, than working [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: Or, or have to do it openly.

Joe Trippi: Yeah, right, right, exactly. Have to have the spot has to be on your efforts, we have to all see it, and we all have to nod our heads or go, what are they talking about, you know. [crosstalk]

Show Me Progress: As opposed to getting some, something coming through which nobody’s paying attention to crosstalk] and…

Joe Trippi: Right.

Show Me Progress: The puppy mills, the puppy mill vote the last election [inaudible] we overwhelmingly voted to do away with puppy mills and the legislature undid it in five minutes.

Joe Trippi: That’s what I’m saying, I mean, what, what signal does that send to anybody about [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: …[inaudible] [crosstalk] discouraging people in this state who [inaudible] participate.

Joe Trippi: …and they, but, who did they do that for? ‘Cause they didn’t do it for [voice: “Uh, uh.”] the, yeah, they didn’t do it for any voters out there. They did it for, for the, uh, puppy mill folks, you know, so, you know, an, an interest group. They probably, you know, you go back and look at who gave [inaudible] but, you know, that’s. And, by the way, even if that isn’t what happened the problem is the poison that that creates among the electorate [crosstalk] of the people who believe and go, that’s what happened, we all know that’s what happened, and that’s how Jeff City works. In other words it starts to poison the entire trust in the system. Um, and that’s why I just don’t think, look, you know, let’s, you know, let’s make it really, if you guys are gonna do this it’s gotta be seventy-five, you gotta have rural, urban, you know, it’s gotta be like, it can’t be, in, you know, in. And look, if they’re gonna pay to, to throw out what we did let’s make them pay off seventy-five percent of the legislature not just, not just [laughter] sixty percent.

Voice: [inaudible] one more question. [inaudible] time for one more question then we gotta go.

[….]

Show Me Progress: Um, if, um, if this passes, um, do you think it’ll cause, um, an increase in kind of initiative petitions in, in this state? Where the idea where, you know, sort of, people are going, uh, the incentive will be like, we have this thing, there’s a problem, we want to address it, and we know that if we put the effort into it we’re, we’re not gonna be subject to the whims of the, the General Assembly as in the puppy mill, you know, bill [crosstalk] which was, you know, that turned around just like that.

Joe Trippi: Yeah, I think [crosstalk] , yeah, I mean, I put it this way, I think people realize that [inaudible] will believe they, uh, will know they have a voice again. Um, right now if you look at the, some of the items we’ve talked, uh, issues we’ve talked about what they learned is you can, you can believe in something, you can sign it, you can put it on there, you can work, you can door to door, you can give twenty-five dollars and in five minutes the legislature takes it all away. Well, no, this means citizens count. We put something on there and we pass it, it’s gonna stick unless they can get a whole lot, you know, across the board, rural, urban, across ideological, um, members who would never vote together on something, uh, vote because this, there was a legitimate mistake or something that wasn’t, wasn’t right. I think, hey, you know, it means we have a voice again. And, um, all you gotta do, look, I believe that anybody who looks at our country over its long illustrious history and Missouri’s history who doesn’t think that there has been a slow steady erosion of people’s voices, I mean the average person’s voice, in our government and the way we do things today, um, and this is just another, overturning what we put on the ballot, is just another step in silencing our, you know, what, our voice about what we want. And this is, you know, your vote counts. It’s gonna say to people your vote matters. What you do matters. And if you believe something and you believe strongly enough that you actually put some elbow grease and some thought and some votes and [inaudible], you know, it can count. Um, what they know right now is it doesn’t. I mean, that’s what the legislature’s been saying. We’re smarter than you or we know better than you or, or we’ve got, or we’ve got really important friends who think you’re wrong and, uh, y
ou can’t hurt our really important friends who think you’re wrong ’cause we’re gonna do right by them instead of doing right by you. And everything is, you know, it, that is a poisonous, uh, thing that breaks down trust between the people and its legislature and its government. And that’s what we’re seeing all, in a weird way, in a lot of ways that’s the kind of stuff that, that helped create the tea party, frankly. Um, they, I mean, that’s what get across all ideological lines here. No, but I’m saying that’s what [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: And, and that and several million dollars from [with another voice] the Koch brothers. Yeah. [laughter]

Joe Trippi: Yeah, yeah, but , you know, what I’m trying to say is, no, but I’m talking about the, the [crosstalk] anger.

Show Me Progress: The anger. [voice: “Yeah.”]

Joe Trippi: And the person who’s, who’s actually sprung up and joined and goes to these, you know, goes to these things. It’s because they’ve lost, it’s, it’s, it, it’s this kind of slow erosion of trust between [crosstalk] them…

Show Me Progress: Right. But we see this thing, there’s this kind of disconnect in that, that everybody loves, everybody hates the General Assembly but they love their representative, you know, and [crosstalk]…

Joe Trippi: That’s changing. For the first time, they have a poll, uh, yesterday or the day before fifty-four percent of the American people would vote against every member of Congress including their own. [voice: “Yeah.”] So, that, that’s starting, that’s what I’m trying to say, we’re seeing this really kind of, I don’t think a very unhealthy disconnect between, uh, uh, I mean, I guess it’s healthy that everybody’s finally that mad and, and wants actually throw their guy, you know, actually looking at their guy, you know, through, through, uh, not rose colored lenses. But I also think it’s, there’s a, uh, a real, uh, I, you know, it’s what, there’s a real, uh, change, sea change in terms of, you know, literally breaking down the level of trust between people and their government which I don’t think is healthy long term unless we do, start doing things to restore it. And that’s [crosstalk] our responsibility as much as. [crosstalk] Yeah., right, yeah.

Show Me Progress: And, and that, this started, [crosstalk] that started a long time ago with, you know, gov, government is the problem.

Voice: I’m sorry, we’ve got to go guys. Sorry about that.

Show Me Progress: Thank you very much.

Joe Trippi: Good talking to you guys….

Joe Trippi in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts! – part 2

08 Thursday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ballot initiatives, Joe Trippi, missouri, Your Vote Counts!

“….the initiative process is one of the last things we’ve got left where I think people really have the ability to, to, to change, you know, to change a messed up system that doesn’t quite work for us. And if you don’t, and if you think it works then take a big deep breath, step back, if, if you look at Washington and Jeff City and look at the fix we’re all in and say like, oh, no, people should have less of a say and we should let the experts and the pols decide whether we got it right in an initiative or not I don’t think that makes sense….”

Joe Trippi (left) and former Lieutenant Governor Joe Maxwell (D) (right) in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts!

Blue Girl and I had the opportunity to sit down for a conversation with Joe Trippi and former Missouri Lieutenant Governor Joe Maxwell (D) in Kansas City this morning about the ballot initiative addressing the Missouri General Assembly’s propensity to overturn the results of ballot initiatives.

Previously: Joe Trippi in Kansas City for Your Vote Counts!

The first part of the transcript:

….Show Me Progress: …The history of, uh, voter initiatives in Missouri is, is really that, um, sometimes they’re relatively narrow margins and then the General Assembly has come back to, to, uh, do something about it in, and change the, basically, reverse the initiatives. Uh, and this is obviously an opportunity for the voters to, to weigh in on that. Uh, but, this is, this is, the language is, it, it’s a pretty large super majority to do this, to, to have the General Assembly do this. In, uh, in some cases isn’t the, uh, that kind of super majority a, a two edged sword in, in the sense if you run into, uh, an initiative that, that passes with fifty percent plus one and, uh, it’s rather controversial and low turnout year? Uh, it takes three fourths of, if this initiative passes to [crosstalk]…

Joe Trippi: To throw it out. Yeah.

Show Me Progress: …to throw it out. And, and if it’s something that [crosstalk]…

Joe Trippi: But to change it all, all they have to do, it’s fifty plus one, uh, [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: On another initiative. [crosstalk]…

…Joe Trippi: …In Jeff City to, to put it back on the ballot and say to the voters, we think this was a mistake, here’s a change we, we want to send it back to you. So, it’s empowering, it’s saying, look, if it’s, once the people of Missouri pass something, regardless of the margin, I mean, it, you know, sorry, Democracy [SMP:  “Um, hmm.”] , you know, is, is, you know, fifty plus one. If that happens, um, the legislature can’t just, because, frankly, who’s paying the legislature to throw it, throw it out? It wasn’t, they weren’t doing it for any, because any voters gave ’em any money to do that. They did it because some interest group gave them money to do that. So, um, we’re taking power out of the interest groups hands, regardless of who that group might be that, uh, was able to make a lot of contributions and get, uh, get them to undo what the, what the people did, um, mistakenly did according to the, the interest group and, you know, and fix it. Well, they can still do that, but they have to put it on the ballot and tell the people, here’s what’s wrong, here’s what. So it is a legitimate, you know, I mean, something’s wrong in the word, you know, some legitimate, uh, uh, thing I think, you know, it’s about putting trust back in the people’s hands not in a bunch of folks, um, sitting in Jeff City who, um, are not, and it’s not like they’re sitting there, you know, uh, pure judges who have no influence going on at, at all on, on, ’em. Uh, it puts it back where it should be, in the hands of the people. And also, by the way, it, I think the other thing about the seventy-five percent is it pretty much insures that legislators from all across the, uh, the state, rural, urban, etcetera, you know, who the, wide spectrum, all have to agree there’s a real problem here. That we need, that, that the people got, I mean, that, that there’s a real problem and it’s not. This isn’t an ideological, we’re, we’re mad ’cause we lost or this group’s mad ’cause it lost and, and can only muster. You, you have to get everybody, you know, large group of legislators regardless of where they’re from or who, or whose interest they’re pressured by to say, you know, this thing is, is, there’s something wrong enough that all of us gotta, we gotta tell the people it’s, there’s a big mistake here and we’re, we’re gonna throw it out.

But the, the reality is, uh, uh, that shouldn’t happen unless there really is. I mean, once people voted that this was what the people of Missouri wanted it’s a, it doesn’t. You’re right, it could be low turnout. Well, that’s, hello, we got responsible [crosstalk], all of us have to take some responsibility for what happened.

Show Me Progress: And we, we, and we, and we’ve had a history of this in Missouri where somebody with very deep pockets, we had [voice: “Rex Sinquefield.”] Rex Sinquefield dropped eleven million dollars to get an initiative on the ballot and then they dropped a lot of money, you know, to, to support it with, and the mail, that, you know [crosstalk]…

Joe Trippi: You know, I did, you know, I know, but you have, you can, it, it’s, it, money can get you qual, can qualify something on the ballot. You can get anything qualified on the ballot with enough money to pay, you know, the folks that collect the signatures and stuff. Um, the problem is the more barriers you put up to that are barriers that you’re putting on people who can’t afford to, to do, to pay money to qualify something. So, let’s get over the, you know, the, he’s gonna qual, somebody’s got the resources can qualify anything they want. The problem is, you are dealing with Missouri voters and you can qualify anything you want, but, and you can spend millions of dollars telling ’em it’s the greatest thing on the planet, but they say, show me and it doesn’t quite happen that way. So, um, and by the way there’s lots of, you know, that’s happened, you know, uh, a woman named Meg Whitman ran for governor of California, spent a hundred eighty-five million dollars, uh, she didn’t, you know, the money doesn’t , doesn’t, you still gotta go convince voters. Now if you convince a majority of voters in Missouri that, you know, that, uh, whether it’s minimum wage or, I mean, dif, different things that have happened then, uh, hey, they, a majority of voters who turned out and the people who didn’t turn out, um, you know, have no excuse at that point. I mean, the people who turned out voted. And, um, you know, what we’re saying is no interest group should be able to put enough, enough, uh, you know, money around Jeff City or, or put enough pressure on, you know, a small group of individuals. Get them to throw it all out.  And if they think there’s something wrong and they think it’s, they can put it right back on the ballot. I mean, there’s not, that’s what I’m saying, it’s not like the seventy-five percent means you can’t just willy nilly change it. If you think there’s something wrong fifty plus one of the, you know, in Jeff City, put it on the ballot, tell, and hold a big press conference, say here’s what’s wrong with it, here’s why we think this needs to go back to voters and we hope the voters will listen to us ’cause we’re your legislators and we know better than you. Well, at least, no, I mean, that’s, I mean, that’s what they’re really saying, so like let’s just say it and get it, get it out of the way and stop the game playing. So, I mean, that’s, that’s, you know, why, you know, why I think this is, you know, so important. I, I, look,
I’ve dedicated, you know, most of my, you know, most of my time in politics trying to empower people to participate in the process. Um, the initiative process is one of the last things we’ve got left where I think people really have the ability to, to, to change, you know, to change a messed up system that doesn’t quite work for us. And if you don’t, and if you think it works then take a big deep breath, step back, if, if you look at Washington and Jeff City and look at the fix we’re all in and say like, oh, no, people should have less of a say and we should let the experts and the pols decide whether we got it right in an initiative or not I don’t think that makes sense.

Show Me Progress: One, one, one of the big, the thing that’s in the mix that, that causes so much problem is the, the campaign finance in the, you know, just in the, the, no limits. And, you know, one of the things that we do we follow, we follow the money all of the time. And, you know, we get the reports and there’s somebody dropping a hundred thousand dollars, a million dollars, you know, eleven million dollars.

Joe Trippi: But that’s the point. [crosstalk] [voice: “…writing three large identical checks three days in a row.”] But that’s the whole point of this thing. How do you, how do you, how do you put an initiative on the ballot, for instance, that actually reforms the way, the, the way, um, money fundraising is done? I mean, actually, you know, makes, transparent, um, puts reasonable limits or anything like that on it? And you qualify it. The people of Missouri say, yes, finally we can end all this, you know, the corrupt practice of massive amounts of money from, you know, uh, from anybody who wants to, to put in, we can end it. And you pass it. And then what the legislators who get the money the way they get it now are gonna not overturn it, say, of course they are. So, there’s only one way, it’s a two step process. The first process is to say, hey, we the people decide the future of this state when we put something on the ballot and we make a decision and you in the legislature who didn’t deal with it. A lot of the problems that are, get, get put on, uh, are put on because the legislature already had this [….] the legislature, um, already was listening to an interest group that said, please don’t, don’t do that. So it wasn’t, uh, dealt with. Um, then, because they were derelict and didn’t do it the people got something on the ballot, passed it, and know the interest group comes back in, says, shame on you legislators, we told you to, you, you, you know, now you gotta go and stop this from happening by throwing it out. If you take that to finance reform we gotta pass this and then, then qualifying a real reform package, I mean, and all kinds of, whether it’s initiative reform and other different, then once you, you can start making, it’s the bulwark, if you will, the foundation for how you gotta do everything else because if you don’t have this then, great, let’s pass campaign finance reform and let’s see how, in an initiative process, ’cause they’re never gonna do it, Jeff City [voice: “No, they’re…”], well yeah. Oh yeah, they’re all gonna go meet in their, in their committee room and, and come up with a really strong campaign finance reform [voice: “No, they’re not gonna do that.”]. No, they’re not gonna do that. So, we do it, but then we do it and they undo it. So, that’s why this is, I mean, it, almost any argument of about how we make politics, uh, and elections more participatory, more, uh, empowering to people, uh, taking it away from the interests that have, you know, look, the, the system in both place, Washington and, um, Jeff City, they’ve been calcified. They became that way over years and years and years of just scar tissue. How, you know, how, you have like literally have special interests writing some of the bill, some of the bills.

Show Me Progress (BG): Our legislature went in [inaudible] when they took office in two thousand one.

Joe Trippi: Right, yeah.

[….]

Show Me Progress: But it’s also, that’s also interesting, that’s, when you raise that point, that’s probably one of the things that would probably get people really upset if the General Assembly overturns term limits. And, and, there, we’ve had arguments about, you know, what is the bad thing about it was the institutional memory that has been lost.

Voice: In order to overturn term limits they’d have to put that back on the ballot as well. It’s a constitutional amendment they would have to have the voters vote on it again and so [crosstalk]…

Joe Trippi: But that’s, that’s what I’m saying it’s a, there’s a very easy protection mechanism again, you know, it, they don’t need to undo it. They could put it right back on the ballot. Um, and in fact, a lot of things would probably not be constitutional amendments anymore as initiatives because of that, I mean, that’s [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: Yeah, the ability to do that, yeah. When I, I lived in California for four years and so we’d get the ballot initiatives, which of course, the qualifying statements, we had a simple rule of thumb. Is that when the actual statements that were on the ballot for the groups, if, if a group was proposing a ballot initiative and their statement had, um, all caps or bold and underlined in it you automatically voted against it. If it was just a straight paragraph, you know, you knew that it was, it was some kind of reasonable thing and you would read it. But the stuff that was, it was like somebody shouting from the rooftop, you’re going, this is some nut that got some initiative going and we’re just, you know, we’re voting against that one. It was, it was, and you would read it and you’d go, yep, I was right. [laughter] And, and that was the thing, one of the things, for me, was, living in California seeing the initiative process just sometimes was just overwhelming. You know, you would get a lot of that.

Joe Trippi: Yeah, but, you know, I mean, like the reality is every, the legislature passes all these laws every year.

Show Me Progress: And no one reads them.

Joe Trippi: No one reads them or anything. And, you know, every, you know, what there have been, you know, in the entire history of, uh, ballot initiatives there’s been like something like two thousand across the country that have actually passed. I mean, I mean, I’m talking about in all of the zillions of laws that have been, you know, you know, passed. And there, you know, there’s, like I say, a lot of ways it’s usually because the, the legislature didn’t do its job. Um, you know [crosstalk]…

Show Me Progress: And, and, I’ve always felt that, too. It’s, initiatives are because the, the legislature is not addressing something.

Joe Trippi: Right, right. And so, right, so, you know, then question is, well, did the initiative address it the way a thoughtful adult legislature would have addressed it…

The final portion of the transcript will appear in a subsequent post.

Recent Posts

  • In our town
  • He be a sycophant by his trade
  • By the sound of their whistles…
  • Campaign Finance: What’s in a name?
  • Rev. Jesse Jackson (1941-2026)

Recent Comments

By the sound of thei… on ICE Whistles
kaboyates on Foul.
Neunundneunzig Luftb… on El Paso, Texas – NOTAM…
Never attribute to m… on El Paso, Texas – NOTAM…
Eric Burlison (r): n… on When extraterrestrials pass by…

Archives

  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,030,977 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...