• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: firearms

HB 1453, HB 1607, HB 1642, HB 1660: Cause

06 Monday Dec 2021

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

firearms, General Assembly, guns, Hardy Billington, HB 1453, HB 1607, HB 1642, HB 1660, Jeff Coleman, John Wiemann, Ron Hicks

Bill prefiling for the Missouri General Assembly session started on December 1st.

The most sacred right wingnut dogma:

HB 1453
Prohibits an employer from terminating an employee for having a firearm in the employee’s vehicle on the employer’s premises
Sponsor: Billington, Hardy (152)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 3070H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1453
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The bill language:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1453
101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE BILLINGTON.
3070H.01I DANA RADEMAN MILLER, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 290, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to firearms on
employer property.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 290, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 290.148, to read as follows:

290.148. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, no employer in this state shall discharge or otherwise terminate the employment of any employee on the basis of such employee having a firearm in the employee’s vehicle on the employer’s property when the employee is arriving to or leaving from the employer’s property for employment purposes or when the employee is conducting activities within the course and scope of his or her employment, provided that the employee’s vehicle is locked and the firearm is not visible. An employer shall not be civilly liable for any injuries or damages resulting from the use of firearms that are stored in compliance with this section.

HB 1607
Preempts any laws or orders that would hinder the operations of a firearm business
Sponsor: Wiemann, John (103)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 3162H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1607
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The bill language:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1607
101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE WIEMANN.
3162H.01I DANA RADEMAN MILLER, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 21, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to firearm
businesses.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 21, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 21.754, to read as follows:

21.754. As the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right, the general assembly hereby occupies and preempts the entire field of legislation that would prohibit, restrict, or reduce the operation of a firearm business, including legislation or orders issued during a declared state of emergency or disaster. Any existing or future orders, ordinances, or regulations that would prohibit, restrict, or reduce the operation of a firearm business are hereby, and shall be, null and void. Neither the state nor an official, agency, or political subdivision thereof shall issue or adopt any order, ordinance, or regulation that would prohibit, restrict, or reduce the operation of a firearm business. As used in this section, “firearm business” means any business engaged in the manufacturing, distributing, selling, or training for the use of firearms or ammunition and shall include shooting ranges.

What could possible go wrong?

HB 1642
Modifies provisions for receiving a concealed carry permit
Sponsor: Coleman, Jeff (032)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 4192H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1642
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

From the bill text [pdf]:

[….] Notwithstanding the residency and fee authorizations provisions of this chapter, a sheriff may process a concealed carry permit for any Missouri resident if the applicant demonstrates a substantial delay in processing permit applications in the applicant’s county of residence. The requirements and fees for residents of other counties shall be identical to the requirements and fees for county residents, except that the sheriff may charge postage for mailing the completed permit materials to the applicant’s county of residence. Both the sheriff in the applicant’s county of residence and the sheriff in the county where the applicant receives his or her permit shall maintain records as required under this chapter.

114 counties, no waiting.

HB 1660
Allows the concealed carry of firearms on public transportation systems and the transporting of non-functioning or unloaded firearms on public buses
Sponsor: Hicks, Ron (102)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 3345H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1660
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

In the bill language [pdf]:

[….] 3. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or chapter 70, 577, or 578 to the contrary, a person carrying a firearm concealed on or about his or her person who is lawfully in possession of a valid concealed carry permit or endorsement shall not be prohibited or impeded from accessing or using any publicly funded transportation system, nor shall such person be harassed or detained for carrying a concealed firearm on the property, vehicles, or conveyances owned, contracted, or leased by such systems that are accessible to the public. For purposes of this section, “public transportation system” means the property, equipment, rights-of-way, and buildings, either publicly or privately owned and operated, of an entity that receives public funds and holds itself out to the general public for the transportation of persons. This includes portions of a public transportation system provided through a contract with a private entity but excludes any corporation that provides intercity passenger train service on railroads throughout the United States or any private partnership in which the corporation engages. [….]

You can always get there if you really need to.

Holy of all holies. There’s a definite pattern here.

Previously:

HB 1722: Effect

HB 1722: Effect

06 Monday Dec 2021

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

bleeding, Brenda Shields, firearms, General Assembly, guns, HB 1722, Public Education, Unintentional irony

“…a bleeding control kit be placed in each classroom of each school district’s school building and each charter school in an easily accessible location…”

There must be some commonplace threat. Or something.

Bill prefiling for the Missouri General Assembly session started on December 1st.

A bill, with the only possible right wingnut solution to a problem of their creation:

HB 1722
Requires bleeding control kits in all public school and charter school classrooms
Sponsor: Shields, Brenda (011)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 4066H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1722
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The bill language:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1722 [pdf]
101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE SHIELDS.
4066H.01I DANA RADEMAN MILLER, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 160, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to bleeding control
kits in public schools.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 160, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 160.485, to read as follows:

160.485. 1. This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Stop the Bleed Act”.
2. As used in this section, the following terms mean:
(1) “Bleeding control kit”, a first aid response kit that contains at least the following:
(a) Tourniquets that are:
a. Endorsed by the United States Department of Defense Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care or its successor entity; or
b. Approved for use in battlefield trauma care by the Armed Forces of the United States;
(b) Bleeding control bandages;
(c) Latex-free protective gloves;
(d) Permanent markers;
(e) Instructional documents developed by the United States Department of Homeland Security’s Stop the Bleed national awareness campaign or the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, or both; and
(f) Other medical materials and equipment similar to those described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision;
(2) “Department”, the department of elementary and secondary education;
(3) “Emergency medical services personnel”, paid or volunteer firefighters, law enforcement officers, first responders, emergency medical technicians, or other emergency service personnel acting within the ordinary course and scope of those professions, but excluding physicians;
(4) “School personnel”, any employee of a public school district or charter school, or any volunteer serving at a public school or charter school, who is designated to use a bleeding control kit under this section.
3. (1) Before January 1, 2023, the department shall develop a traumatic blood loss protocol for school personnel to follow in the event of an injury involving traumatic blood loss. The protocol shall meet the requirements of this section and shall be made available to each school district and charter school.
(2) The traumatic blood loss protocol shall:
(a) Require that a bleeding control kit be placed in each classroom of each school district’s school building and each charter school in an easily accessible location to be determined by local emergency medical services personnel;
(b) Include bleeding control kits in the emergency plans of each school district and charter school, including the presentation and use of the bleeding control kits in all drills and emergencies;
(c) Require each school district and charter school to designate at least five school personnel members in each school building who shall obtain appropriate training annually in the use of a bleeding control kit including, but not limited to:
a. The proper application of pressure to stop bleeding;
b. The proper application of dressings or bandages;
c. Additional pressure techniques to control bleeding; and
d. The correct application of tourniquets;
(d) Require each bleeding control kit in school inventories to be inspected annually to ensure that the materials, supplies, and equipment contained in the bleeding control kit have not expired and that any expired materials, supplies, and equipment are replaced as necessary; and
(e) Require a bleeding control kit to be restocked after each use and any materials, supplies, and equipment to be replaced as necessary to ensure that the bleeding control kit contains all necessary materials, supplies, and equipment.
4. (1) The department shall, in collaboration with the United States Department of Homeland Security and the state department of public safety, include requirements in the traumatic blood loss protocol for school personnel to receive annual training in the use of bleeding control kits.
(2) The training requirements may be satisfied by using any instruction available from the Missouri Hospital Association, the American College of Surgeons or a similar organization authorized by the United States Department of Homeland Security, or the emergency medicine department of a health-related institution of higher education or a hospital.
(3) The training requirements shall use nationally recognized, evidence-based guidelines for bleeding control and shall incorporate instruction on the psychomotor skills necessary to use a bleeding control kit in the event of an injury to another person including, but not limited to, instruction on proper chest seal placement.
(4) The training may be provided by local emergency medical services personnel, representatives of any organization or institution that developed or endorsed the training, other trained school personnel, or other similarly qualified individuals.
(5) Certification in bleeding control shall not be a required element of the training requirements. If the training provides for certification in bleeding control, the instructor shall be authorized to provide the instruction for the purpose of certification by any organization or institution that developed or endorsed the training.
(6) The training requirements may allow online instruction.
5. (1) A bleeding control kit may contain any additional items that:
(a) Are approved by emergency medical services personnel, as such term is defined in section 190.600;
(b) Can adequately treat an injury involving traumatic blood loss; and
(c) Can be stored in a readily available kit.
(2) Quantities of each item required to be in a bleeding control kit may be determined by each school district.
6. (1) The department and each school district and charter school shall maintain information regarding the traumatic blood loss protocol and the Stop the Bleed national awareness campaign on each entity’s website.
(2) Upon request by a school district or a charter school, the department may, in collaboration with the department of public safety, direct the school district or charter school to resources that are available to provide bleeding control kits to the school district or charter school.
7. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, each school district and charter school shall implement the traumatic blood loss protocol developed under this section before the end of the 2022-23 school year.
(2) The requirements that a bleeding control kit be placed in each classroom, that each kit be restocked as necessary, and that school personnel receive training under this section shall be subject to an appropriation to cover all costs related to such requirements by the general assembly.
(3) Any school district or charter school may receive donations of funds for the purchase of bleeding control kits that meet the requirements of this section and may receive donations of bleeding control kits that meet the requirements of this section.
8. Any school district or charter school that has a traumatic blood loss protocol prior to the effective date of this section shall be exempt from the requirements of this section.
9. This section shall not be construed to create a cause of action against a school district, a charter school, or any school personnel. Any school personnel who in good faith uses a bleeding control kit as provided by this section shall be immune from all civil liability for any act or omission in the use of a bleeding control kit unless the act or omission constitutes gross negligence or willful, wanton, or intentional misconduct.

That’s their only solution.

Previously:

HB 1453, HB 1607, HB 1642, HB 1660: Cause (December 6, 2021)

HB 960: doing something

19 Tuesday Feb 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

domestic violence, firearms, General Assembly, gun violence, guns, HB 90, Tracy McCreery

Representative Tracy McCreery (D) [2019 file photo].

A bill, introduced on Valentines Day by Representative Tracy McCreery (D):

HB 960
Prohibits certain individuals from possessing a firearm due to domestic violence and requires police officers to remove firearms at the scene of a domestic violence call
Sponsor: McCreery, Tracy (088)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2019
LR Number: 2032H.01I
Last Action: 02/18/2019 – Read Second Time (H)
Bill String: HB 960
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The bill summary [pdf]:

HB 960 — ORDERS OF PROTECTION
SPONSOR: McCreery

This bill requires courts that issue a full order of protection after a hearing to prohibit any respondent from possessing or purchasing firearms while the order is in effect, inform the respondent of the order either orally or in writing, and forward the order to the State Highway Patrol for enforcement as specified in the bill.

The bill also requires notification of the State Highway Patrol so that the National Instant Criminal Background Check system can be updated and the FBI notified when there is a conviction of stalking in the second degree. Unlawful possession of a firearm will include misdemeanor offenses of domestic violence under the law of any state or the United States and violations of the court order specified in the bill.

The bill has an emergency clause.

It makes complete sense. It will never again see the light of day in the right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly.

HB 341: Because, goodness knows, there aren't other pressing issues like unemployment…

28 Friday Jan 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

firearms, General Assembly, HB 341, Jeanie Riddle, missouri

Man linked to Giffords shooting rampage called ‘very disturbed’

….The suspect is unstable, Dupnik said, but the sheriff would not say he is “insane”….

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 341

96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES RIDDLE (Sponsor), FRANZ, FUNDERBURK AND COX (Co-sponsors).

1051L.04I                                                                                                                                                  D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To repeal section 475.375, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to petitions to remove firearms disqualification.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

           Section A. Section 475.375, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as section 571.092, to read as follows:

           571.092. 1. Any individual over the age of eighteen years who has been adjudged incapacitated under chapter 475, who has been involuntarily committed under chapter 632, or who is otherwise subject to the firearms-related disabilities of 18 U.S.C. Section 922(d)(4) or (g)(4) as a result of an adjudication or commitment that occurred in this state may file a petition for the removal of the disqualification to ship, transport, receive, purchase, possess, or transfer a firearm imposed under 18 U.S.C. Section 922(d)(4) or (g)(4) and the laws of this state….

[emphasis in original]

Which would repeal and replace:

Missouri Revised Statutes

Chapter 475

Probate Code–Guardianship

Section 475.375

….No individual who has been found guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may petition a court for restoration under this section….

[emphasis added]

Offered without further comment.

House Bills in Jefferson City – February 25

26 Thursday Feb 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bills, firearms, General Assembly, missouri

So much for local control, eh?

HB 875 Prohibits political subdivisions from restricting the open carrying of firearms and requires them to incorporate the justifiable use of force defenses into local ordinances regarding weapon offenses

Sponsor: Largent, Scott (120) Proposed Effective Date: 08/28/2009

CoSponsor: Leara, Mike (95) ……….etal. LR Number: 2059L.01I

Last Action: 02/25/2009 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

HB875

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

House Calendar HOUSE BILLS FOR SECOND READING

Uh, if state law allows a “justifiable use of force defense” then isn’t that the law in the State of Missouri by definition? Just asking.

Let’s be redundant and say the same thing over and over again repeatedly several times a lot.

The details:

[section in brackets to be deleted][section in bold to be added]

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 875

95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES LARGENT (Sponsor), LEARA, MUNZLINGER, WILSON (130), FLANIGAN, BURLISON, GUERNSEY AND RIDDLE (Co-sponsors).

2059L.01I                                                                                                                                                  D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To repeal section 21.750, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to firearms.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

           Section A. Section 21.750, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as section 21.750, to read as follows:

           21.750. 1. The general assembly hereby occupies and preempts the entire field of legislation touching in any way firearms, components, ammunition and supplies to the complete exclusion of any order, ordinance or regulation by any political subdivision of this state. Any existing or future orders, ordinances or regulations in this field are hereby and shall be null and void except as provided in subsection 3 of this section.

           2. No county, city, town, village, municipality, or other political subdivision of this state shall adopt any order, ordinance or regulation concerning in any way the sale, purchase, purchase delay, transfer, ownership, use, keeping, possession, bearing, transportation, licensing, permit, registration, taxation other than sales and compensating use taxes or other controls on firearms, components, ammunition, and supplies except as provided in subsection 3 of this section.

           3. Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit any ordinance of any political subdivision which conforms exactly with any of the provisions of sections 571.010 to 571.070, RSMo, with appropriate penalty provisions, [or which regulates the open carrying of firearms readily capable of lethal use] or the discharge of firearms within a jurisdiction, provided such ordinance complies with the provisions of section 252.243, RSMo, and incorporates the justification defenses found in chapter 563, RSMo.

           4. The lawful design, marketing, manufacture, distribution, or sale of firearms or ammunition to the public is not an abnormally dangerous activity and does not constitute a public or private nuisance.

           5. No county, city, town, village or any other political subdivision nor the state shall bring suit or have any right to recover against any firearms or ammunition manufacturer, trade association or dealer for damages, abatement or injunctive relief resulting from or relating to the lawful design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, or sale of firearms or ammunition to the public. This subsection shall apply to any suit pending as of October 12, 2003, as well as any suit which may be brought in the future. Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall restrict the rights of individual citizens to recover for injury or death caused by the negligent or defective design or manufacture of firearms or ammunition.

           6. Nothing in this section shall prevent the state, a county, city, town, village or any other political subdivision from bringing an action against a firearms or ammunition manufacturer or dealer for breach of contract or warranty as to firearms or ammunition purchased by the state or such political subdivision.

You know the 120th Legislative District could have had Kristi Kenney as a representative but the republican party spent an ungodly amount of money and instead they got Scott Largent. What a waste.

And is this a solution in search of a problem?:

HB 873 Provides that homeschooled students shall be treated the same as non-homeschooled students for financial aid purposes

Sponsor: Schaaf, Robert (28) Proposed Effective Date: 08/28/2009

CoSponsor: LR Number: 2028L.01I

Last Action: 02/25/2009 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

HB873

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

House Calendar HOUSE BILLS FOR SECOND READING

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 873

95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE SCHAAF.

2028L.01I                                                                                                                                                  D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 173, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to student financial aid.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

           Section A. Chapter 173, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 173.1160, to read as follows:

           173.1160. Students who have completed a secondary school education in a home school setting that is treated as a home school or private school under state law shall receive the same consideration as nonhomeschooled students for purposes of financial aid, and no rule or prerequisite for such aid shall be conditioned so as to disadvantage homeschooled students.

 

Recent Posts

  • Just one more sign that we’re all living in an empire in rapid decline
  • How it started…
  • Somebody should probably tell him
  • Thank you, Joe Biden (D)!
  • Early this morning

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,046,908 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...