Send in the clones. A bill prefiled in the Missouri Senate yesterday:
SB 84 Provides for the conscience rights of individuals who provide medical services
LR Number: 0610S.01I Fiscal Note not available
Last Action: 12/17/2012 – Prefiled
Current Bill Summary
SB 84 – This act provides medical freedom of conscience protection for medical professionals and health care institutions with respect to the provision and participation of specified medical procedures or research. “Specified medical procedures or research” is defined as “abortion, abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, sterilization which is not medically necessary, assisted reproduction, human cloning, human embryonic stem-cell research, human somatic cell nuclear transfer, fetal tissue research, and non-therapeutic benefit fetal experimentation and no longer includes any phase of patient medical care.” Medical professional is defined as a physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, medical assistant, medical researcher, medical or nursing school faculty, student or applicant for studies or training in any program in the health care professions. The definition for health care institution is in the act as well.
No medical professional or health care institution shall be civilly, criminally, or administratively liable for declining to participate in or provide specified medical procedures or research that violates the professional’s or institution’s conscience. However, a health care institution shall provide a consent form to be signed by a patient before admission to the institution stating that it reserves the right to decline to provide such specified medical procedures or research.
“Conscience” is defined as religious, moral or ethical principles. For purposes of this act, a health care institution’s conscience shall be determined by reference to its existing or proposed religious, moral, or ethical guidelines, mission statement, constitution, bylaws, articles of incorporation, regulations, or other relevant documents. A medical professional’s conscience means a sincere and meaningful belief in God or in relation to a supreme being, or a belief which, though not so derived, occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by God among adherents to religious faiths.
It shall be unlawful for a medical professional or health care institution to be discriminated against based on the professional or institution declining to participate in specified medical procedures or research that violate the professional’s or institution’s conscience. The act prescribes the list of prohibited discrimination against a medical professional or institution. An employee asserting a right not to participate in specified medical procedures or research shall provide reasonable notice under the circumstances of his or her intent not to participate.
A cause of action for damages or injunctive relief, or both, may be brought for the violation of any provision of this act. It shall not be a defense to any claim arising out of the violation of this act that such violation was necessary to prevent additional burden or expense on any other medical professional, health care institution, individual or patient. It shall be an affirmative defense for an employer that the specified medical procedure or research was so integral to the duties of the employee’s position and to the central business purpose of the business or enterprise that a person of ordinary intelligence understood that participating in the specified medical procedure or research at issue was a requirement of the employee’s position.
Upon a finding of a violation of this act, the aggrieved party shall be entitled to treble damages, including pain and suffering, the costs of the action and reasonable attorney’s fees. In no case shall recovery be less than five thousand dollars for each violation in addition to the costs of the action and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Nothing in the act shall be construed to authorize any medical professional or health care institution to withhold emergency medical treatment or services imminently necessary to save the life of a patient under the professional’s or institution’s care. Nor shall the act be construed to relieve a medical professional from any duty which may exist under current law to inform a patient of the risks, prognosis, medical options and resources available to the patient, including information required to be given under the abortion regulation chapter.
The General Assembly may, by concurrent resolution, appoint one or more of its members who sponsored or co-sponsored this act in his or her official capacity, to intervene as a matter of right in any case in which the constitutionality of this law is challenged. This act contains a severability clause.
This act is identical to SCS/HCS/HB 1541 (2012) and SCS/SB 657 (2012).
Right wingnuts sure do like the concept of using the power of the state and law to enforce religious dogma.
Really? Not with state funds:
Missouri Revised Statutes
Laws in Force and Construction of Statutes
Cloning–use of state funds prohibited, definition.
1.217. No state funds shall be used for research with respect to the cloning of a human person. For purposes of this section, the term “cloning” means the replication of a human person by taking a cell with genetic material and cultivating such cell through the egg, embryo, fetal and newborn stages of development into a new human person.