• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: September 2011

Campaign Finance: a tale of two candidates

27 Tuesday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, governot, Jay Nixon, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Peter Kinder

Yesterday, at the Missouri Ethics Commission, first, from Governor Jay Nixon’s (D) campaign:

C001135 09/26/2011 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI UFCW Local 655 Elect Political Fund 300 Weidman Road Ballwin MO 63011 9/26/2011 $10,000.00

C001135 09/26/2011 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Jeffrey Fort 7745 Spanish Lake Drive Las Vegas NV 89113 Self Business Investor 9/26/2011 $10,595.58

[emphasis added]

Hmm. That last one is an odd amount. Do you think he emptied out his piggy bank? Well, it could be that.

Then, there’s Lieutenant Governor (R) Peter Kinder‘s campaign getting those “plus one dollar” contributions after the long drought:

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Robert Hermann 777 Cella Road St Louis MO 63124 Retired Retired 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Menlo Smith 15009 Manchester Rd. # 284 Ballwin MO 63011 Sunmark Capital Corp. Chairman 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Hunter Engineering Company 11250 Hunter Drive Bridgeton MO 63044 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Randy Herzog 600 S Riverside Road St Joseph MO 64502 Herzog Contracting Executive 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Orscheln Management Co. 2000 US Hwy 63 South Moberly MO 65270 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

C091145 09/26/2011 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Douglas Albrecht 16 Upper Ladue Road St Louis MO 63124 Bodley Group Executive 9/26/2011 $5,001.00

[emphasis added]

Just making sure that everyone else knows about their heavy hitter contributions to the beleaguered leading republican candidate (still, not officially) for governor?

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Keeping up with the Governor? Not so much – part 2 (September 23, 2011)

Campaign Finance: throwing good money after bad? (September 21, 2011)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Is this the jobs plan?

27 Tuesday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, missouri, Vicky Hartzler

Today, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) via Twitter:

@RepHartzler Rep. Vicky Hartzler

Today I get my FIRST cavity filled! :'( I don’t know which is more painful-getting the tooth filled or Harry Reid’s grandstanding over CR. 10 hours ago

That government health insurance comes in handy, eh?

Campaign Finance: Did that come with a six pack?

27 Tuesday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, republicans

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C000953 MO REPUBLICAN PARTY 9/26/2011

August Busch III

1 MidRivers Mall Drive Ste. 210

St Peters, MO 63376

n/a Retired

9/26/2011

$25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Or maybe not.

Wall Street: they went after the wrong people

26 Monday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

New York, police, Protests

Occupy Wall Street Protesters Pepper Sprayed by New York Police Department

The New York Daily News reported that over 50 arrests were made by the New York Police Department on September 24, 2011 in connection with the “Occupy Wall Street” protest movement. The same story mentioned “there were unconfirmed reports that mace may have been used” and the online story contained an embedded video that clearly shows a noxious gas being deployed by a police officer. USLaw.com’s slow motion analysis of the same video shows a senior New York Police Department officer deploying a spray cannister in an unorthodox manner on a small group that were being ‘kettle netted’ by a half dozen officers, some of whom were also affected by spray….

You know, the titans of arbitrage and other speculative financial alchemy could easily calm the seas by taking a few lousy percentage points in their top marginal tax rate. They won’t. Who do you think will spray protesters after they break public safety unions in the interest of accumulating an even higher proportion of wealth? Just asking.  

Image

Pantless Pete

25 Sunday Sep 2011

Tags

Missouri Governor's Race, Missouri Lt. Governor, Missouri Political Cartoons, Missouri Political Humor, Missouri Republican Party, Penthouse Magazine, Penthouse Pet, Peter Kinder, Tweeting Politicians

Posted by Michael Bersin | Filed under Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

The General Assembly Special Session: Rep. Jason Kander (D)

25 Sunday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

General Assembly, Jason Kander, missouri, Special Session

Representative Jason Kander (D-44) sent out a constituent update on the General Assembly special session this afternoon via e-mail:

…Far too many Missourians looking for work can’t find it. We were called into special session to do our part to address that problem. People are counting on us to act. But if you’ve seen the paper this week about the special session in Jefferson City, I hope you’ll forgive me for admitting that I am, at this moment, frustrated….

….Unfortunately, due to a small minority of extremists in the House and Senate, we appear to be at a standstill. Let me be clear, this is not a Democrat vs. Republican thing.

Republicans control 70% of the seats in the legislature and Democrats are in accord on most major components of the economic development legislation we’ve been debating. Rather, it’s a Republican vs. Republican thing. After months of talking they are still so busy fighting one another they can’t seem to close a deal. And so our state stands to suffer.

Like so often in the legislature, blustering personalities and weak political rationales block progress….

“…blustering personalities and weak political rationales block progress…”

For the Grover Norquists of the world, that’s a feature, not a bug.

Thoughts on Roy Blunt's observations about governmental dysfunction

24 Saturday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

congresional gridlock, missouri, Roy Blunt

Worth reading:  Steve Benen’s analysis of Roy Blunts contention that:

… he has long believed that “the country is essentially in almost a holding pattern” until November 2012, when voters will have to decide what direction they want government policy to take. Until then, he said, “I’m not overwhelmingly optimistic” that Congress will be able to get much done.

Benen makes a good argument that, while true, this comment points out one of the problems with our current political culture. As Benen notes, Blunt seems to be saying that when folks sent GOP Tea Partiers to the House, they essentially insured gridlock. However, Benen notes, current polls show us that this is not at all what a majority of Americans want; that their policy preferences are, in fact,  quite clear:

We actually have a pretty good sense of what the American mainstream wants policymakers to do right now – polls show strong, bipartisan support for investing in infrastructure, preventing public-sector layoffs, and tax credits for new hires.

I would only add to Benen’s list that there is widespread public support for the Buffet rule.

The only question for Blunt and other GOP legislators is why, in the face of such clearly expressed policy preferences on the part of their constituents, they are willing to continue throwing sand in the gears of government? Could the explanation for GOP obstructionism be that they are rigid ideologues who can refuse to compromise because they can get away with it, because nobody holds them accountable for the results? One of the commenters on Benen’s post points out the almost reflexive bias in news paper reports about the votes over last week’s disaster relief continuing resolution, specifying in particular the lede to this Washington Post article:

Washington lurched toward another potential government shutdown crisis Friday, as the House approved by a 219-203 vote a GOP-authored short-term funding measure designed to keep the government running through Nov. 18 and Democrats in the Senate immediately vowed to reject the bill..

Tell me, if you read that, would you believe that the GOP was, once again, preparing to hold the economy hostage? Or would you curse the dammed Democrats for their political game playing. Another comment also underlines just how skewed public perceptions often are:

Yesterday, I was in our local P.O waiting in line. There was a fellow, probably, mid 60s talking with the postal clerk, who, was a ‘Nam era vet. They were talking about the poor state of the economy and were worried about Social Security issues. The common theme came down to “Well, I don’t trust the Democrats, either. Both parties are bad”. I wanted to scream about the Hostage Taking by the RepuGs, but so few, other than die hard Democrats, really want to hear the truth. It is a shame so many blame both parties on an equal basis.

Our task for 2012? Do our damnedest to get the the story out. Make the GOP accountable for what they are doing. It’ll be hard if not impossible. Apart from overt bias of the type one encounters at Fox News, the media is lazy and many reporters confuse lack of bias with sloppy reporting. Progressives don’t have a Fox News equivalent, nor do we have the kind of dollars the other guys will throw into the fight. But if we don’t win it, the consequences are unthinkable.

White House – petitions: removing "Under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance

24 Saturday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

establishment clause, Petitions, Pledge of Allegience, We the people, White House

Previously:

White House: petitions – We the People (September 22, 2011)

Those who ignore history are, well….stupid (October 25, 2007)

The White House started an online petition process on September 22nd, with an initial staff review threshold of five thousand signatures for petitions submitted through the process. Several petitions have quickly reached that threshold, including one to legalize marijuana, one to abolish the TSA, and, as of this writing in third place (with over 9,000 signatures), one to remove “Under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance:

We Petition the Obama Administration to:

Edit the Pledge of Allegiance to remove the phrase “Under God”.

The Pledge of Allegiance is said every day in schools across America. It is a government sanctioned speech, and should remain neutral in matters of religion. In its current state, it supports the existence of God, which goes against several religions, and supports others. This bias should not be supported by the country according to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Created: Sep 22, 2011

Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Human Rights

In 1943, as described in WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BARNETTE ET AL., 319 U.S. 624, the text was:

…’I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of [319 U.S. 624, 629]  America and to the Republic for which it stands; one Nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.’…

Note what is missing.

The pledge is not a founding document:

The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931). It was originally published in The Youth’s Companion on September 8, 1892. Bellamy had hoped that the pledge would be used by citizens in any country…

In 1954:

History of the Pledge of Allegiance:

….the Knights of Columbus mounted a campaign to add the words “under God” to the Pledge. The nation was suffering through the height of the cold war, and the McCarthy communist witch hunt. Partly in reaction to these factors, a reported 15 resolutions were initiated in Congress to change the pledge. They got nowhere until Rev. George Docherty (1911 – 2008) preached a sermon that was attended by President Eisenhower and the national press corps on 1954-FEB-7….

And, back to WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BARNETTE ET AL., 319 U.S. 624, no individual is under any compulsion to recite the Pledge of Allegiance in whole or in part:

….A person gets from a [319 U.S. 624, 633]  symbol the meaning he puts into it, and what is one man’s comfort and inspiration is another’s jest and scorn….

….Struggles to coerce uniformity of sentiment in support of some end thought essential to their time and country have been waged by many good as well as by evil men. Nationalism is a relatively recent phenomenon but at other times and places the ends have been racial or territorial security, support of a dynasty or regime, and particular plans for saving souls. As first and moderate methods to attain unity have failed, those bent on its accomplishment must resort to an ever-increasing severity….

….Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard….

….If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us….

[emphasis added]

In a time of war, no less. In 1943.

The 2011 Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa: Paul Begala – part 3

24 Saturday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Harkin Steak Fry, Iowa, Paul Begala, Tom Harkin

Previously:

The 2011 Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa (September 18, 2011)

The 2011 Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa: Senator Bernie Sanders (I) (September 19, 2011)

The 2011 Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa: Paul Begala – part 1 (September 20, 2011)

The 2011 Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa: Paul Begala – part 2 (September 22, 2011)

“…She saw through the eyes of an immigrant maid who had lived that American dream. And I never forgot that. And the whole ride home that day she left me with these three words. She spoke, by the way, three languages. She was fearsome smart, just not formally educated. But the whole ride home, three words. Only in America. Only in America. And what she meant by that was not the purple mountain’s majesty and the amber waves of grain…”

Paul Begala speaking under the big tent at the Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa on September 18, 2011.

Paul Begala was one of the featured speakers at the annual Harkin Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa on Sunday. The final portion of Paul Begala’s speech:

….Paul Begala: …And, and today, apparently, it’s in the papers, the President is announcing that he is going to call on Congress to pass a Buffett tax, not Jimmy Buffett, [laughter] uh, although with some of my friends you tax a margaritas you make a pile of money. [laughter] Uh, but this is Warren Buffett, the second richest man in America who said, who wrote an op-ed a little while ago and said, raise my taxes. He says, it is unjust that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. And it is and he is right and the President is moving to address that now. [applause] God bless [inaudible]. [applause]…

…You know, and all he’s trying to do, I have these right wing friends, all these rich friends, trying to do is, is, we’re trying to do is get this thing moving again. Jump start this thing. ‘Cause here’s the dirty little secret, if we do what the President and, and these senators are trying to do, you know what will happen? We’ll get the middle class moving again. And what happens when the middle class gets moving again? [voices] It lifts people up out of poverty, the American dream lives again, and, guess what, Warren Buffett gets all the richer still. I’m all for it, but the only way to do this is to lift everybody up to get this thing humming again. It’s, see they’re two very, very different approaches to this. Their approach is classic elitism. Right? It’s, it’s, they believe this. Let’s target all of our resources to a tiny elite at the very top and it’ll all trickle down to the rest of us. [voices] Well, we tried that. And it failed. It was the Bernie Madoff strategy basically. [voice: “Yeah.”]  Well, we’ll just trust old Bernie and it’ll all come down to the rest of us, right? We have a completely different approach. And that approach says, as we say back home, let’s put the jam on the lower shelf where the little folk can reach it. [laughter] Let’s empower people so that they can live a better life and earn a better income and raise their families and, and everything then moves up. Look, this is what happened the last time Democrats ran the House and the Senate and the White House. We did this. We know how to do this. We balanced the budget and created twenty-three million jobs and ushered in the greatest economic expansion that the whole world had ever seen. And we did it by focusing on the middle class, not on a few elites at the top. [applause] That’s what worked. [cheers] [applause]

You know, I, I mean, it’s, and it’s not that Republicans don’t love the poor. They must, ’cause they’ve created so many of ’em. [voice: “Yeah.”] [laughter] But they have a different view. It’s an honest to God true story. I have a friend in Houston who is a wealthy, wealthy man, but grew up poor. And God bless him, he’s still a Democrat.  But he lives in the richest part of town and he told me this story a couple months ago. One of his neighbors came out and they were shooting the breeze. And the neighbor, of course, a big Republican, equally wealthy and grew up poor, and so he says to my friend, well, why do you still help all those Democrats, how can you be a Democrat and their, you’re such a liberal and, you know. Why, basically? And he said, well, heck, you and I both grew up poor, we got into good schools, we’ve lived the American dream and I want, and he looked around and there was a gardener across the street. And he said, well, I want that man, that gardener and his son to live the same dream that we lived, don’t you? And you know what that Republican said? [voices: “No.”] That gardener’s son will be my son’s gardener. [voices: “Yep.” “No.”] Friends, that is their belief. It is the death of the American dream. They believe that the only way they can advance themselves is to tear the rest of you down. [voices: “Yep.” “Fascism.”] And we have a completely different view [voice: “That’s right”], which is, we’re all in this together, friends. We’re one nation, under God, by God, and we’re gonna [applause] go up or down together.  And that’s [applause], that’s why this is so profound. It is not even simply a debate about economics ’cause there’s no debate. We know what works, right?

It is also a debate about values. Values matter most. And, and think about how we were raised. And that’s why you’re here today, right? Think about this. And I’ve tried to raise my children this way, and certainly, my parents and, and the teachers and priests and coaches I had raised me this way. And they told me this, I still remember this, what was the first question ever asked in human history, recorded human history? The first question. Well, we know what it was, right, it was in the book of Genesis, right? When Cain and Abel, were the first two children of Adam and Eve, and they both were called upon to sa, to serve up a sacrifice to God. And, and Cain offered some of the fruits of his field and Abel offered like some goats and livestock, I guess the Lord preferred the, the meat. I don’t know [laughter], God’s not a vegetarian, I don’t know why. [laughter] But, Cain was, was thrown into a jealous rage. And so he picked up a rock and he slew Abel. He killed his brother. And so God, who wanted to spark conscience in humanity, he knew, God knows all. And he knew. So he said, though, to Cain, where is your brother? Even though he knew, ’cause he wanted to spark guilty conscience and knowledge of his own, Cain’s own sinfulness. And Cain said to the Lord, God, the first question any human being ever asked, Am I my brother’s keeper? [voice: “Yes.”] Am I my brother’s keeper? And I was raised to believe and I am raising my children to believe that how you answer that question will determine, frankly, whether you are good person or not. Right? [applause] Certainly, what, whether we’re [inaudible] or not. [applause] Am [applause], am I my brother’s keeper? [applause] Am I my sister’s keeper? [applause] And some of our friends have lost sight of that. Or they give the wrong answer, they go, no. No, I’m not, right, if you get work, but you’re on your own. Well, that’s not how I was raised. And that is not, I don’t think, it’s not the real values of, of the real Texas. It’s certainly not the values of Iowa and Iowa families. Because we all know this because we live it. Right?
We got here because we were all in this together. There’s this huge myth that they always say, oh, you know, the self made man. You know, well, actually, particularly out here and certainly out in Texas how did we get here? Well, you know what we did? We all pulled together. And a bunch of strangers, they formed a wagon train, but they all came out together. And they each protected the other. And then they got here and they cleared each other’s fields and they built each other’s barns and then they built a little one room school house and they all chipped in together to help each other. And that’s what they meant when they said, from many one. [voice: “Yep.”] That’s what they meant. And this is, in our time, how we all get here. I mean, I, I, I don’t know about you, but, I mean, I’ve lived this dream. It’s why I’m so passionate about it.

You, know, my grandmother was a maid. She came to this country, she didn’t speak a word of English, she didn’t have a nickel in her pocket, she came from Hungary, but she knew she wanted to be free. And she got the only job she could get. She never even went to a day of high school. But she had a strong work ethic and a great belief in freedom. And she got to America and she started working as a maid. And, you know, because it’s America she didn’t stay a maid. She got on with the phone company, she met an electrician at the phone company, they joined a union at the phone company [cheers][applause][inaudible], and, they had to be paid a minimum wage, they had to be given decent health benefits, they had to, the company had to help pay for their retirement and their pension. They, they were required to give them a safe workplace so that they didn’t lose fingers and hands in the machinery. They were able to send their son, my father, to free public schools, unimaginable in the old country. And my father got a good education and he got a college degree. My grandmother lived to see her son wear a suit and tie every day and be a businessman. She lived to see her grandson go to law school and advise the President of the United States. She was able to live in dignity, in Social Security. When her health needs came up she was able to go to Medicare which she had paid into all of her working life. And she lived the entire American dream. She lived to be ninety-four. And we, we lost her seven years ago so she’d be right almost, just over a hundred right now.

And, and I still remember, best day I ever had, honest to goodness, working the White House. It wasn’t, you know, the state dinners and all of, you know, the proms, and even getting to meet the Pope, which for a faithful Catholic was one of the great moments of my life. It was when I got to bring Grandma Begala to the Oval Office. [laughter] [cheers] [applause] Let me tell you, you talk about the American dream. [applause] And, you know, you can imagine, you know, President Clinton, and that is a room, one, one day you should all go to the Oval Office. It is the most spectacular room I’ve ever been in, believe me. And, I never got used to it I thought. And I had special reverence for it, even though I started every day in that room for a couple of years. And I saw four star generals turn to puddle of goo in that room. [laughter] I mean, it’s an intimidating place. Well, you should have seen Grandma B. She was about five foot nothing [laughter], little spitfire. She comes charging in like she owned the place. She goes over to the fireplace. There’s those two great wingback chairs there and the fireplace. And she says, Mr. President, come here. I said, oh, Grandma, we don’t say that. [laughter] he kind of ambles over, you know. Is this a working fireplace, Mr. President? [laughter] [voice impression] Yes, ma’am. [laughter] Why, why do you ask? [laughter] She said, well, these andirons that hold the log, they’re so clean. What do you use when you polish them, Mr. President? [laughter] Well, she’s a maid, right? She saw through the eyes of an immigrant maid who had lived that American dream. And I never forgot that. And the whole ride home that day she left me with these three words. She spoke, by the way, three languages. She was fearsome smart, just not formally educated. But the whole ride home, three words. Only in America. Only in America. And what she meant by that was not the purple mountain’s majesty and the amber waves of grain. They have those in Hungary. I’ve been.

In fact, I went when the Berlin Wall was coming down I went with a congressional delegation, actually, uh, as a staffer. And, and she didn’t want me to go. She’s like, oh, Paulie, I got you out of there, you don’t need to be going back. [laughter] I said, I think it’s going to be all right. She said, no, no, no, if I had stayed there you’re father, he’d be poor. And you, and she stopped for a second, she said, you, oh, they’d have shot you. [laughter] That, that mouth of yours, honey, they’d a shot you quick. [laughter] I said, Grandma, I believe it’ll be okay. So, she didn’t mean what the poets meant. She meant the moral America. She meant the America that you all have done so much to build, where neighbor cares about neighbor, where people help people, where families lift each other up and hold each other up, and actually even reached down to the people who haven’t come up yet. It is not the America of every man for himself and dog eat dog. It is the America of the founding fathers, it is the America of the people in this tent, and, most of all, it is the America of Tom Harkin and that is why I’m so glad to be fighting with Tom Harkin. God bless you all. [applause] Thank you very much. [applause][cheers]

Campaign Finance: Keeping up with the Governor? Not so much – part 2

23 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, governor, Jay Nixon, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Peter Kinder

Previously: Campaign Finance: Keeping up with the Governor? Not so much… (September 22, 2011)

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C001135 09/23/2011 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI AgXplore International, LLC PO Box 638 Parma MO 63870 9/21/2011 $25,000.00

C001135 09/23/2011 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Ironworkers Political Education Fund 1750 New York Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20006 9/21/2011 $10,000.00

C001135 09/23/2011 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Hammond and Shinners, PC 7730 Carondelet Avenue Suite 200 Saint Louis MO 63105 9/21/2011 $10,000.00

Governor Jay Nixon (D) continues to haul in the big contributions.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • What a friend we have in Donald (r), and Betsy, and…
  • Campaign Finance: they ain’t playing around
  • Can play with AI, can’t be bothered to certify petition signatures
  • We could have had nice things…
  • Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,051,320 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...