• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: July 2010

Whose political agenda?

20 Tuesday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

AFA, DADT, Defense Authorization Act, Don't Ask Don't Tell, homophobia, James Inhoffe, Mission Compromised, missouri, Olliver North, Todd Akin, Tony Perkins

Tonight (July 20) Rep. Todd Akin (R-2nd), along with fellow travelers Ollie North, Tony Perkins, the hysterically funny Senator James Inhofe, and a few others, will participate in a Webcast to demagogue against the Defense Authorization Act, specifically efforts to lay Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) to rest. The Webcast is sponsored by an organization which shares its name with a turgid thriller by Ollie North, Mission Compromised, and proclaims that its goal is to insure that we not “use the military to advance a political agenda” – which some might view as a novel sentiment coming from the patriotism and warmongers on the right.

What specific political agenda are they worried about?  According to the overheated rhetoric on the Mission Compromised Website, we must “protect our military,” vulnerable and fragile institution that it is, from efforts to repeal DADT, a misguided exercise in “social engineering” that is being used to advance the homosexual “agenda” and secure “special protection for homosexuals.” You name a right-wing, anti-gay buzz word, and you’ll find it on the Website, I guarantee.

Interestingly enough, Igor Volsky over at the Wonk Room suggests that there is another agenda in play here – that of the religious right which seeks to “manufacture fear to make money and hold on to what’s left of their constituency.” Volsky quotes “former AFA insider,” Joe Murray:

The battle for marriage, the fight against Heather and her two mommies, and the fictional “homosexual agenda” were created for one reason – it produced a cash cow. […] Need to see how the cow works? Look no further than the American Family Association (AFA).

In its battle to keep patriots from serving in the U.S. Armed Forces for no other reason than their sexual orientation, the AFA is preparing to educate supporters about the importance of Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell (DADT)….When the reader opens the AFA email, he cannot help but see a picture of what appears to be a U.S. soldier sitting alone on a Middle Eastern street. The solider looks exhausted, isolated, and desperate. His picture is centered and on his right (viewer’s left), are the words “DON’T ASK” and on his left (viewer’s right) are the words “DON’T TELL.”

The insinuation is clear – thanks to the power of the “homosexual” lobby and a complacent administration, U.S. soldiers are left stranded on the battlefield as a new batch of recruits are soon to be inducted into the military under the rainbow flag. In other words, the image is an unfortunate manipulation of U.S. troops to further a profitable political message.

I am not suggesting that Akin is anything but sincere in his homophobia. Not to put too fine a point on it, he doesn’t seem clever enough by half to game the believers like, for instance, one suspects Roy Blunt does with regularity.

Sincere or not, though, I also fervently believe that he is quite aware that ginned up fear of “the homosexual agenda” is a profitable and useful political tool. And it is exactly this awkward combination of stupidity and cupidity mendacity that makes me despair when I drive around my conservative neighborhood and see all the Vote for Akin signs – how, in a just world, could such crude manipulators ever prevail?

 

When wingnuts collide: Todd Tiahrt and Jerry Moran in the Kansas republican U.S. Senate primary

20 Tuesday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2010, Jerry Moran, Kansas, Primary, right wingnuttia, Todd Tiahrt, U.S. Senate

There is a disadvantage to living in the Kansas City media market – you get the benefit of seeing all of the right wingnut republican campaign commercials on your idiot box. Todd Tiahrt (r) and Jerry Moran (r) are duking it out in the upcoming Kansas republican U.S. Senate primary:

The transcript:

I’ve worked hard to make sure that farmers and ranchers in Kansas have success.

[Jerry Moran Fights for Kansas]

I’ve voted to reduce or eliminate capital gains taxes and estate taxes.

[Jerry Moran Voted to Reduce Taxes]

I’ve been a supporter of the Bush tax cuts.

[Supported Bush tax cuts]

And almost everything that President Obama has proposed I have been against.

[Opposed Obama agenda]

I have no interest in giving terrorists, uh, Constitutional rights in the United States.

Have opposed bringing terrorists to the United States for any reason.

[Opposed bring terrorists to the U.S.]

And don’t believe that under the Constitution terrorists have constitutional rights.

[No rights for terrorists]

I’m Jerry Moran and I approved this message.

[Approved by Jerry Moran Paid for by Moran for Kansas]

Oh, brother.

You mean these Bush tax cuts?:

Critics Still Wrong on What’s Driving Deficits in Coming Years

Economic Downturn, Financial Rescues, and Bush-Era Policies Drive the Numbers

By Kathy Ruffing and James R. Horney

Updated June 28, 2010

Some critics continue to assert that President George W. Bush’s policies bear little responsibility for the deficits the nation faces over the coming decade – that, instead, the new policies of President Barack Obama and the 111th Congress are to blame. Most recently, a Heritage Foundation paper downplayed the role of Bush-era policies (for more on that paper, see p. 4). Nevertheless, the fact remains: Together with the economic downturn, the Bush tax cuts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq explain virtually the entire deficit over the next ten years (see Figure 1)….

Morans.

21st Legislative District: July 2010 campaign finance reports

20 Tuesday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

21st Legislative District, campaign finance, John Cauthorn, Kelly Schultz, Mike Becker, missouri

Previously: 21st Legislative District: April 2010 campaign finance reports

There is one Democratic Party candidate and two republicans in the open seat race in the 21st Legislative District. The current republican representative is term limited out.

Kelly Schultz (D) filed her first quarter campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on July 15th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: FRIENDS FOR KELLY SCHULTZ

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $44,511.38

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $16,559.50

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $61,505.88

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $6,793.37

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $51,201.22

35. TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 29 + 30 + 31 – 32 – 33 – 34) $250.00

Wow. Just wow. That’s some impressive fundraising.

Let’s take a look at where the contributions came from:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: FRIENDS FOR KELLY SCHULTZ

Report Date: 07/15/2010

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Liberty, MO 06/05/2010 $150.00

Capital Women’s Political Caucus PAC Jefferson City, MO 06/22/2010 $200.00

Monetary

Carpenters Local Union No. 945 PAC Jefferson City, MO 06/30/2010 $200.00

Carpenters’ District Council Of Kansas City and Vi Kansas City, MO 04/08/2010 $1,000.00

CWA District 6 Political Education Committee Saint Louis, MO 05/04/2010 $500.00

Harrietts List Saint Louis, MO 06/21/2010 $2,000.00

Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers Local N 3325 Bridgeton, MO 06/16/2010 $325.00

Hoisting Engineers Local 513 Bridgeton, MO 06/15/2010 $325.00

IUPAT District 2 PAC Washington, DC 06/11/2010 $250.00

IUPAT PAC District 3 Washington, DC 06/30/2010 $500.00

Labor Club of Mid-MO PO Fulton, MO 06/21/2010 $1,000.00

Missouri AFL-CIO COPE Jefferson City, MO 06/22/2010 $325.00

Missouri NEA-PAC Jefferson City, MO 06/24/2010 $325.00

Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 562 Saint Louis, MO 06/30/2010 $500.00

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 562 Saint Louis, MO 06/10/2010 $100.00

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Saint Louis, MO 06/22/2010 $500.00

Teamsters 245 PAF Springfield, MO 05/18/2010 $500.00

Teamsters Local 838 Kansas City, MO 05/19/2010 $150.00

Teamsters Local 955 PAC Blvd Kansas City, MO 05/21/2010 $150.00

Teamsters Local Union 688 Saint Louis, MO 05/21/2010 $300.00

Teamsters Local Union No. 541 Kansas City, MO 05/18/2010 $300.00

Teamsters Local Union No. 682 PAC Saint Louis, MO 06/25/2010 $150.00

UFCW Local 655 Ballwin, MO 06/08/2010 $500.00

Working people! And a lot of contributions from individuals.

The expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: FRIENDS FOR KELLY SCHULTZ

ReportDate: 07/15/2010

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

Act Blue 06/30/2010 Quarterly Transaction $39.34

Christopher Girouard Columbia, MO 06/01/2010 Campaign Manager $1,000.00

Hallsville Community Development Association Hallsville, MO 06/01/2010 Parade Literature $100.00

Lakeway Publishers Morristown, TN 06/02/2010 Fair Ad $125.00

Petromart Columbia, MO 06/21/2010 Gas $50.00

Brian Roach Columbia, MO 06/01/2010 Finance Director $500.00

Staples 04/06/2010 Office Supplies $190.53

Staples 04/12/2010 Office Supplies $37.50

Staples 06/03/2010 Postage $88.00

Staples 06/16/2010 Office Supplies $46.90

US Postal Service Columbia, MO 06/14/2010  $66.59

US Postal Service Columbia, MO 06/21/2010 Postage $56.00

Walmart Columbia, MO 06/21/2010 Parade Supplies $138.70

No primary, low burn rate. That’ll definitely change for the general election in November.

The first of two republican candidates (in alphabetical order), Mike Becker, filed a Committee Statement of Limited Activity [pdf] with the Missouri Ethics Commission on July 15th.

The second of two republican candidates, John Cauthorn, filed his first quarter campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on July 15th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: FRIENDS OF CAUTHORN

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $19,160.00

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $7,295.00

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $26,455.00

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $7,711.03

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $18,343.97

35. TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 29 + 30 + 31 – 32 – 33 – 34) $0.00

[emphasis added]

That’s a decent fundraising quarter, but still far behind the Democratic Party candidate.

Let’s see where the money came from:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: FRIENDS OF CAUTHORN

Report Date: 7/13/2010

Missouri Corrections Officers Association Jeffeson City MO 04/06/2010 $500.00

East Central AG Products Inc Laddonia MO 04/08/2010 $1,000.00

Anheuser Busch Cos Inc St Louis MO 04/14/2010 $350.00

Bank of St Elizabeth Elizabeth MO 06/22/2010 $1,000.00

Ren Potterfield Trucking Monroe City MO 06/25/2010 $500.00

MBA Ozark Region PAC Jeffeson City MO 65102 06/25/2010 $325.00

MBA Pony Express Region PAC Jeffeson City MO 06/25/2010 $325.00

Mid-Missouri Energy Inc Matla Bend MO 06/26/2010 $150.00

Is anyone surprised? And there are a number of individual contributions.

The expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: FRIENDS OF CAUTHORN

ReportDate: 7/15/2010

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

Gibbs Pool and Turner Jefferson City MO 04/12/2010 campaign compliance $500.00

Gibbs Pool and Turner Jefferson City MO 06/24/2010 campaign compliance $500.00

Andrew Engler Columbia MO 65203 03/29/2010 exp. Reim $38.78

Capitol Consulting Jefferson City MO 04/19/2010 FR $1,135.05

Rocket Group Jefferson City MO 04/29/2010 push cards $679.41

Audrain County Historical Society Mexico MO 05/02/2010 FR $200.00

Katie Merrill Hallsville MO 05/18/2010 advertising $200.00

Centralia Fireside Guard Centralia MO 05/26/2010 $225.00

Graffitti Mexico MO 65265 06/01/2010 adv t-shirts $170.07

Unger Photography Mexico MO 06/01/2010 adv t-shirts $145.33

Graffitti Mexico MO 06/14/2010 adv t-shirts $131.73

Walmart Mexico Mexico MO 06/18/2010 candy parade $35.87

Capitol Consulting Jefferson City MO 06/23/2010 FR $1,179.05

Rocket Group Jefferson City MO 06/23/2010 adv signs $2,519.11

Graffitti Mexico MO 07/01/2010 adv stickers $12.85

Parade candy! T-shirts! Awesome.

Even a broken clock is right two times a day

20 Tuesday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

CBO, Congressional Budget Office, missouri, Nouriel Roubini, Paul Krugman, Roy Blunt, stimulus

Roy Blunt tweeted earlier today:

Biden says failing $862B “stimulus” was too small and would have been bigger with more Democrats. The choice is clear on Nov. 2.

Failing stimulus? Guess Roy prefers to ignore the figures from the new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on the impact of the stimulus on employment and economic growth:

* Raised the level of real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 1.7 percent and 4.2 percent,

* Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.7 percentage points and 1.5 percentage points,

* Increased the number of people employed by between 1.2 million and 2.8 million, and

* Increased the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs by 1.8 million to 4.1 million compared with what those amounts would have been otherwise. …

Or maybe Blunt is agreeing with VP Biden that the stimulus should have been larger?  That would certainly also put him in agreement with economists like Paul Krugman and Nouriel Roubini who are pointing out that the current slowdown in the recovery can be traced to an inadequate stimulus package. Somehow, though, I doubt that our Roy is much swayed by expert opinion, so I think we are left with a nasty little exercise in how to be both dishonest and snide in 140 characters or less.

Blunt is, of course, like the proverbial broken clock that is right twice a day, unequivocally correct that the choice is clear come November. Sadly, though, he seems to be relying on the not unreasonable hope that the Republican effort to obstruct economic progress while muddying public perception will win out. As Paul Krugman observed today:

Since Mr. Obama took office, they [i.e. Republicans] have engaged in relentless obstruction, obviously unworried about how their actions would look or be reported. And it’s working: by blocking Democratic efforts to alleviate the economy’s woes, the G.O.P. is helping its chances of a big victory in November.

 

30th Legislative District: July 2010 campaign finance reports

19 Monday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

30th legislative District, campaign finance, General Assembly, Lexi Norris, missouri

This is an open seat race with one Democratic Party candidate and one republican.

Lexi Norris, the Democratic Party candidate, filed her second quarter campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on July 15th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: COMMITTEE TO ELECT LEXI NORRIS

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $32,124.27

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $12,420.00

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $44,802.30

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $3,958.86

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $35,971.14

35. TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 29 + 30 + 31 – 32 – 33 – 34) $0.00

[emphasis added]

That’s a really good fundraising quarter. And a really low burn rate. Really low.

Let’s take a look at where the contributions came from:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: COMMITTEE TO ELECT LEXI NORRIS

Report Date: 07/15/2010

Carpenters’ District Council of KC and Vicinity Kansas City, MO 04/08/2010 $1,000.00

Local #124 Voluntary Political Fund Kansas City, MO 04/19/2010 $500.00

Teamsters Local Union No. 541 Kansas City, MO 05/20/2010 $500.00

I.B.E.W Local 53 Voluntary Political Fund Kansas City, MO 05/22/2010 $500.00

Local 610 Political Action Committee Fund Maryland Heights, MO 05/23/2010 $100.00

Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Liberty, MO 06/11/2010 $250.00

Teamsters Local 245 Political Action Fund Springfield, MO 06/11/2010 $500.00

Teamsters Local 838 Political Action Fund Kansas City, MO 06/11/2010 $250.00

Teamsters Local 955 Political Action Fund Kansas City, MO 06/11/2010 $250.00

Teamsters Local Union 688 Political Action Committ Saint Louis, MO06/11/2010 $500.00

Missouri NEA-PAC Jefferson City, MO 06/26/2010 $325.00

Teamsters Local Union No. 541 Kansas City, MO 06/28/2010 $500.00

Working people! And a lot of other individual contributors.

The expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: COMMITTEE TO ELECT LEXI NORRIS

ReportDate: 07/15/2010

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

Staples Kansas City, MO 04/05/2010 Office supplies $21.80

Staples Kansas City, MO 04/17/2010 Office Supplies $25.44

Jackson County Democratic Committee Independence, MO 04/25/2010 Advertisement $40.00

Staples Kansas City, MO 05/02/2010 Office supplies $21.80

MFWDC Kansas City, MO 05/16/2010 Campaign Ad $75.00

Staples Kansas City, MO 05/17/2010 Office supplies $27.24

Almar Printing Kansas City, MO 06/11/2010 Literature $1,071.43

United States Post Office Kansas City, MO 06/13/2010 PO Box renewal $50.00

Staples Kansas City, MO 06/21/2010 Office supplies/postage $88.28

ActBlue Cambridge, MA 06/30/2010 Credit card processing fe $46.05

[emphasis added]

There it is – that low burn rate. There’ll be plenty of stuff to spend money on after the August primary. Meanwhile, you think someone is going door to door?

Nick Marshall, the republican candidate, filed his second quarter 2010 campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on July 15th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: COMMITTEE TO ELECT NICK MARSHALL

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $16,495.44

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $3,338.50

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $20,298.13

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $8,641.22

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $9,890.45

35. TOTAL INDEBTEDNESS AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 29 + 30 + 31 – 32 – 33 – 34) $123.17

[emphasis added]

Ouch. That’s not in the same league.

Let’s take a look at where the money came from:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: COMMITTEE TO ELECT NICK MARSHALL

Report Date: 7/10/2010

John S. Elliott Smithville, MO Inside Information 05/25/2010 $1,000.00

There are a number of small dollar contributors.

The expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: COMMITTEE TO ELECT NICK MARSHALL

ReportDate: 7/10/2010

A. EXPENDITURES OF $100 OR LESS BY CATEGORY

Debit Card Fees $1.75

Credit Card Merchant Fees $46.19

Pay Pal Fees $7.01

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

USPS Kansas City, MO 05/03/2010 Postage $5.15

USPS Platte City, MO 05/26/2010 Postage $88.00

USPS Kansas City, MO 06/10/2010 Postage $84.00

Dave’s Print Shop Dearborn, MO 06/24/2010 Labels,Letterhead & Envelopes $377.24

Glad Rents, Inc. Gladstone, MO 06/26/2010 Table/Chair Rental $82.96

Pizza Hut  Kansas City, MO 06/19/2010 Pizza for workers $49.07

The UPS Store Kansas City, MO 05/25/2010 Copies $10.48

Sam’s Club Kansas City, MO 06/19/2010 Food / Supplies for Volunteers $179.89

Lowe’s Home Centers Inc. Kansas City, MO 05/23/2010 Sign Supplies $38.70

Tomfooleries Restaurant & Bar  Kansas City, MO 06/07/2010 Food for Event $257.36

Koch and Cloumbia Bag North Kansas City, MO 04/05/2010 Poll Work Supplies $39.98

Vistaprint  Lexington MA 04/19/2010 Campaign Lit $191.24

Office Depot Kansas City, Mo 04/20/2010 Printer Toner $151.84

Ultimate Athletic Sportswear Co. Parkvill, MO 04/26/2010 Campaign Shirts $327.36

Ultimate Athletic Sportswear Co. Parkville, MO 64152 06/29/2010 Campaign Shirts $123.17

Preserving American Liberty Parkville MO 04/27/2010 Event Booth $50.00

TW Sportswear Kansas City, MO 04/30/2010 Campaign Banner $107.90

Donut King Kansas City, MO 06/21/2010 Volunteer Food $10.00

Mo. Fed. Rep. Women St. Louis, MO 04/15/2010 Campaign School $25.00

Mainstreet Parkville Assoc. Parkville, MO 05/19/2010 Parade Fee $20.00

Sams’ Club  Kansas City, MO 04/01/2010 Poll Work Supplies $41.66

USPS Antioch Station Kansas City, MO 05/03/2010 Postage $4.90

Wild Appricot Toronto, Ontario 05/07/2010 Online Services $25.00

Green Dragons Parkville, MO 05/20/2010 Booth Rental $75.00

USPS Antioch Station Kansas City, MO 04/09/2010 Postage $28.00

Smokehouse BBQ Gladstone, MO 06/29/2010 Food for Event $57.86

Wild Apricot Toronto, Ontario 06/08/2010 Online Services $25.00

Wild Apricot Toronto, Ontario 06/15/2010 Online Services $19.17

Office Depot Kansas City, MO 06/17/2010 Toner $81.35

Pizza! T-shirts! Donuts! Well, okay, campaign shirts.

Previously:

Campaign Finance – July 2009: Alexia Norris (D) in the 30th Legislative District

30th Legislative District: Alexia Norris – October 2009 campaign finance report

30th Legislative District: January 2010 campaign finance reports

30th Legislative District: April 2010 campaign finance reports

Coal ash contains arsenic, lead, selenium, mercury and more

19 Monday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Following up on my earlier posting about AmerenUE’s proposed coal ash landfill on the Missouri River floodplain (upriver from the St. Louis drinking water supply), I’m forwarding to you this e-mail I received:

DON’T MISS ACT 3 OF THE COAL ASH LANDFILL HEARING SAGA

We need to pack the house again to show our concern.

Load up the car and travel to Union on July 20th for hearing #3.  Your support has taken us this far but we need you to go the distance with us. Just showing up in numbers sends a powerful message.  The landfill zoning amendment is one of several issues on the P&Z agenda which can be found at http://www.franklinmo.org.

PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING

DATE: Tues, JULY 20th

TIME: 7:00 pm

WHERE: Franklin County Government Center

400 E. Locust Union MO 63084

Goal: withdraw proposed zoning amendment, form Advisory Group to study options, protect our communities from toxic contamination.  

What to Expect:  We’ve been surprised by the county process twice (on June 15 and July 6) so can’t make any promises but expect brief comments concerning the proposed amendment will be heard by the commissioners.  We recommend reading the actual proposed zoning amendment by visiting http://www.leomo.info.  Look for the amendment link in the sidebar.

If you absolutely, positively cannot make it but want to voice concern, please send comments and contact info to:   CoalWasteLandfillLetters@gmail.com

Vying to fill Rachel Storch's shoes

19 Monday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Amy Hilgemann, Dan Schesch, David Leipholtz, missouri, Susan Carlson

Rachel Storch decided to get married instead of running for re-election in HD 64, St. Louis. That’s our loss.

In a district that Storch won with 92.5 percent of the vote last time out, we can discount the Constitution candidate she whomped in ’08 as well as the two Republicans who’ve filed. Four Democrats are vying for the spot.

Dan Schesch can also be discounted. Not that he doesn’t have some good ideas; he just doesn’t have a chance to win. Schesch got only 9 percent of the vote when he ran for St. Louis City Treasurer two years ago. Undaunted by getting squashed in that election, he’s running for state rep. But he’s doing so without a cadre of volunteers–it’s he, himself and him doing the work. As for funds, he’s pulled in $3200 as of the end of the second quarter.

Which isn’t going to go very far against Susan Carlson, the front runner. She’s the one who has garnered the geld in this race–more than $58,000 at the end of the quarter. Carlson’s husband is a big Democratic donor, and she has a network that includes the women’s groups based in the County. She also has a high powered campaign consultant that her connections and money have brought in, and she has the endorsements of Rachel Storch (the outgoing state representative of this district), Joan Bray, Mayor Francis Slay, Harriett’s List, and so on.

She’s already sent out one professional looking mailer. It might not be the sort of piece that grabs you and sticks in your mind, but neither was it tacky. No doubt, there will be more mailers to come.

Her weaknesses are those of  a front runner whose lead is built on money and connections: she’s not knocking doors right now, and she doesn’t have a strong presence in the city, which is most of the geographical area of the district. And some of her endorsements and connections carry with them a certain amount of backlash. For example, the scuttlebutt is that the women’s groups in the County didn’t necessarily back Shelley Welsch in her successful run for mayor of University City, and part of this district is in U. City. So Welsch backers are, to some extent, returning the snub to Carlson on what should be her home turf.

Unlike Carlson and Schesch, Dave Leipholtz is a young guy making his first foray into the political arena. He’s got more money than anybody else except Carlson–but his 6,000 bucks is a fer piece off from Carlson’s 58 thou. He’s not a natural politician–there will be no Jeff Smith comparisons on personality and ease in front of the public. But he is a former teacher, and he does have some devoted kids running around knocking doors for him. That can be a plus and a minus. He’s supposedly knocked every door in his universe of targeted voters twice and is nearly complete with the third round now. But an acquaintance of mine tells me that when a couple of the kids knocked on his door on a hot day, they had no followup when he said he knew who Dave was. They didn’t ask for his vote and didn’t ask him to do anything besides take a piece of literature. Leipholtz does have the backing of City Democrats chair Brian Wahby [EDIT: I’ve been informed that Brian is not officially supporting a candidate in this race. -Clark] and the endorsement of the City Labor Club. Also, his campaign is being run by the same man who is running State Senator Joe Keaveny’s. (Keaveny, by the way, has a primary challenger that he’s taking seriously, a retired policeman named James Long that the policeman’s association put up to run because Keaveny sponsored the local control of St. Louis police bill.) So Leipholtz and Keaveny are running some joint canvasses.

Amy Hilgemann’s a real wild card here. She is the wife of the former state rep from the district before Storch took over after he was termed out. She and her husband, Bob, moved to St. Louis just north of the Botanical Garden in the late 1970s, just as the neighborhood really started to go downhill. She has a PhD in public policy, and she has participated in a lot of elections, both with her husband and in her own elections to the school board. She started on the school board as a reformer with some good ideas, but she rubbed a good many people the wrong way. People think of her as maybe a little bit crazy but definitely tenacious. She has personally knocked around 1,000 doors, and together with the volunteers from the ward organization, she’s knocked a lot more. She has the endorsement of some of the citywide electeds, like President of the Board of Alderman Lewis Reed and Collector of Revenue Greg Daly. On the other hand, she hasn’t filed a statement of her contributions and expenses with the Missouri Ethics Commission, so presumably she’s taken in less than $500.

Who knows how this is all going to shake out. More than likely, Carlson will win, but if she doesn’t get much face to face time with primary voters, Leipholtz or Hilgemann could sneak in.

Correction: For some reason, Hilgemann has two IDs at the Missouri Ethics Commission. The one I didn’t see at first shows that she has taken in almost $3500 altogether and spent all but $900 of that on printing and holding a fundraiser.  

NAACP in Kansas City: Rev. William Barber – "…we have to have more than words…"

18 Sunday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Kansas City, missouri, NAACP, national convention, William Barber

“…we know from our history that we have to have more than words…”

Reverend William Barber, NAACP National Board Member.

On Sunday afternoon, July 11th, Reverend William Barber, NAACP National Board Member was the first speaker at the legislative workshop titled “Engaging Congress: the NAACP’s Legislative Agenda to Achieve One Nation, One Dream”:

Reverend William Barber: Good afternoon to all of you who have gathered here today for this legislative workshop. My name is, uh, William Barber, State Conference President, member of the National Board, and chair of the Legislative and Political Action Committee of the National Board. It is good to have you all, others are making their way as they come here today.

This is such a critical session…

…The language of our federal constitution is lofty and grand in its tone. We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. But we know from our history that we have to have more than words, and as our very able Washington Bureau chief constantly reminds us in Washington and across this country the struggle continues, what brother Hilary Shelton keeps saying to us.

We have always had to struggle to make the words have meaning in the lives of everyday people. I thought about it when I read again Thurgood Marshall’s speech, the two hundred bicentennial of the Constitution in nineteen eighty-seven. He said this, we the people was far too clear for any ameliorating construction, and yet, writing for the Supreme Court in eighteen fifty-seven, nearly seven decades after the Constitution was penned, Chief Justice Taney penned the following passage in the Dred Scott case – on the issue of whether in the eyes of the framers slaves were constituent members of the sovereign and were to be included among we the people, Justice Taney said, we think they are not, and that they are not included and were not intended to be included, they have been for more than a century before been regarded as being of an inferior order altogether unfit to associate with the white race. And so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. Accordingly, said Justice Taney in eighteen fifty-seven, despite what the words of the Constitution said, the Negro of the African race was regarded as an article of property, billed and bought and sold as such. No one seems to have doubted the correctness of the prevailing opinion of that time, and it is still our opinion today.

Nearly seven decades after the constitutional convention the Supreme Court reaffirmed the prevailing opinion of the framers regarding the rights of Negroes in America. It took a bloody civil war before the Thirteenth Amendment could be adopted to abolish slavery, though not the consequences slavery would have for the future Americans. While the Union survived the civil war, the Constitution did not. In its place arose a new, said Thurgood Marshall, more promising basis for justice and equality. The Fourteenth Amendment, insuring the protection of life, liberty, and property of all persons against deprivations without due process and guaranteeing equal protection of the laws. And yet almost another century would pass before any significant recognition was obtained, the rights of Black Americans to share equally in such basic opportunity as education, housing and employment. He went on to conclude because they had asked him to come and celebrate the Constitution, but Thurgood Marshall said I’ll have to do more than celebrate, I have to tell the truth. He said, what is striking, brother Shelton, is that the role, is the role these principles have played throughout American history in determining the condition of the Negro. They were enslaved by law, emancipated by law. Disenfranchised and segregated by law, and finally they have begun to win equality by law. Along the way new constitutional principles have emerged to meet the challenges of a changing society.

The men who gathered in Philadelphia in seventeen eighty-seven could not have envisioned these changes. They could have not imagined nor would they have accepted that the document they were drafting would one day be construed by a Supreme Court to which had been appointed a woman and a descendant of an African slave. We the people, no longer enslaved, but the credit does not belong to the framers. It belongs to those who refused to acquiesce in outdated notions of liberty, justice and equality and who strive with [inaudible].

The role of the NAACP over these one hundred and one years and the role of the Washington Bureau is to constantly call upon us and every member of Congress to refuse to acquiesce. We and our friends must be the molders of conscience and the makers of change in a place that can and too often does become drunk with the perks of power, Washington, D.C.  And determined by the allure of money where, which, where we the people, especially those in the margins, battered by racial disparities and class disparities, get left out of the debate and the actions of legislation. We have to remember and act upon these grand principles of we the people and demand fundamental change with a clear focus on justice for all and equal protection under the law. So in a sense, the Washington Bureau is engaged in a perpetual sit-in. Just like you sat in at lunch counters we sit in Congress and sit at Representative’s and Senator’s desks to protest. The NAACP Washington Bureau led by lobbyist Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. helped advance not only integration of the armed forces in nineteen forty-eight, but also passage of civil rights act fifty-seven, sixty-four, sixty-eight as well as the Voting Rights Act in sixty-five. Civil rights act in which Mitchell was an unsung hero of the movement for racial equality, Director of the NAACP’s Washington Bureau for twenty-eight years, some called him and dubbed him the one hundred and first Senator. One person wrote and called him the lion in the lobby.

Today the lion is Hilary Shelton. [applause] And he leads. Today the visionary is Hilary Shelton and he leads the team, a team whose goal has never been to merely fit into Washington and be happy just to be in the senator’s office or the representative’s office. But whose goal it is propose legislation for fundamental change, challenge legislation that increases racial disparity and poverty and gives more for the haves and less for the have nots. The Bureau of the NAACP is not to fit in, but to engage in a perpetual sit-in, to build political coalitions, to rally actions from the field, and to be a moral instigator that applauds when Congress gets it right, says no when the right wing wants to run backwards, says come on when the expedient wing wants to run scared, and says you have got to be kidding [laughter] when the middle wing wants to please everybody, which almost always leaves out the most needy somebody [voices: “Yes.” “That’s right.”]

While we have made progress, the NAACP and its Washington Bureau heads up the justice wing and our work is not yet done because every social indicator clearly says these United States have not yet fully upheld its founding principles. Too many of our children languish in poverty and are in schools resegregated that are underfunded and underperforming. Too many of our people are without health care and health insurance. Too many of our people suffer when civil rights laws are not fully engaged and implemented, and implemented in education and economically suffer. Many of o
ur people are making minimum wage, not a living wage, and do not have the fullness of labor rights they should have. Too many of our people live in substandard inhumane housing and are victimized by predatory racially biased lending. Too many of our people are affected by global warming and environmental disasters like we see in the Gulf, rooted in deregulation, a lack of oversight, and downright greed. [voices: “That’s right.”] Too many of our poor are warehoused in prison and affected by racist application of the law. We still fall too short of who we claim to be in our Constitution…

…We’re here today to hear the victories, to be clear about the fights ahead, and to recommit ourselves to the principle of one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Brother Leon, Brother Shelton, lead us in this endeavor. God bless you….

Reverend William Barber speaking at the July 14th plenary session.

Previously:

The 101st NAACP National Convention in Kansas City

NAACP in Kansas City: Benjamin Todd Jealous at the opening press conference

NAACP in Kansas City: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson at the opening press conference

NAACP in Kansas City: report on the impact of the BP oil spill in the Gulf region

NAACP in Kansas City: Sunday – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Michelle Obama – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Representative Sheila Jackson Lee on the tea party and human rights

NAACP in Kansas City: Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – “Now is no time to quit.”

NAACP in Kansas City: Representative Emanuel Cleaver – “Don’t you forget it!”

NAACP in Kansas City: Wednesday afternoon press conference – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Rev. Al Sharpton – “There clearly is some racial leaves in their tea bag…”

NAACP in Kansas City: Rev. Jesse Jackson – “We want jobs, justice, and education for all.”

NAACP in Kansas City: Benjamin Todd Jealous – “…we all need a testament of hope…”

NAACP in Kansas City: press conference Q and A – “…we’ll keep our eyes on that prize…”

NAACP in Kansas City: Rep. Barbara Lee – “Power concedes nothing without a demand…”

NAACP in Kansas City: Rep. Barbara Lee – "Power concedes nothing without a demand…"

17 Saturday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Barbara Lee, Kansas City, missouri, NAACP, national convention

“…Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has, it never will…

Representative Barbara Lee (D-California), Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus.

On Sunday afternoon, July 11th, Representative Barbara Lee (D-California) was part of the panel for a legislative workshop titled “Engaging Congress: the NAACP’s Legislative Agenda to Achieve One Nation, One Dream”. Representative Lee spoke on health care reform and other issues:

Representative Barbara Lee (D): [applause]….Thank you so much. Good afternoon. [voices: Good afternoon.”] Hilary [Shelton], first of all, thank you so much for that very warm and humbling introduction. But also, I just have to thank you for your leadership. And, uh, during those very difficult days in two thousand and one I, I want to tell you, it was very difficult to be the only one to vote against giving any president a blank check to go to war forever endless war. But, Hilary, many of you, all of you really stood right there by my side because you knew what that was about. And I really want to thank you so much for your support. [applause] And also I just have to say, yes, we’re trying to end this, uh, endless war. The American people are war weary. And I was so humbled the other night when we took one step toward that and the Lee Amendment got one hundred votes with the majority of the members of the black caucus voting for us to begin to get out of Afghanistan. [applause]  So that was a major, major step in the right direction…

…Let me, uh, thank Reverend Barber, thank you so much for your leadership. Thank you for staying on the front line with all of our foot soldiers of freedom. I want to thank Leon Russell and I have to just thank the entire membership of the NAACP for staying strong and focused and dedicated to freedom and justice. I come from El Paso, Texas originally. My family was a family that was actually, they raised me in the NAACP.  My grandfather, my mother, they helped to desegregate, uh, the schools in El Paso, Texas with, you may know the name, Dr. Nixon. [voices:  “Yeah.”] You remember Dr. Nixon.  So, uh, the NAACP, uh, runs in my blood. And if it weren’t for the NAACP I certainly would not be standing here as a member of Congress. [applause] And so I honor you. I thank you. We’ve come a long way. We have so much further to go.

Let me also take a moment to just, uh, thank Ben Jealous. I know he’s not here, he’s very busy, but Ben, I, he’s still my constituent, you know, he’s from the, uh, Bay area, lives in Alameda. Doing a phenomenal job with the NAACP, as is Roslyn, our board chair. You know, all the young people here, uh, this time is just, uh, it makes me realize that our future is secure. [voice: “All right.”, applause] And so I just have to thank [applause] the leadership for that. Let me also take a moment to, uh, thank Alice Huffman and my, who is our state chair from California and George Howland [sp], my Oakland chair, for, I think the California NAACP, and Hilary and I talk about this, we’re always on the cutting edge of so many issues, and I just have to thank them for staying the course and for really, they can be very proud of being part of the overall California NAACP movement. And of course, to my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus, let me, uh, thank Senator Burris for your leadership. Havin’ one voice in the Senate [applause] I tell you can make a difference, that one vote. [applause] And, also, to Congressman Bobby Scott, I mean, Bobby, of course you know [applause] that he’s gonna speak in a minute, but. [applause] He has got a, the entire Congress focused on why we need to put money on the front end in terms of educating our young people, rather than on the back end in cracking this prison, this cradle to prison pipeline, so thank you again, Bobby. [applause] He’s done a [inaudible] job and [inaudible] which you’ll hear about in a minute.

And I have to, uh, just take a moment to say to Charles Ogletree, and, and I really have to share this, Charles, thank you so much for your leadership. And it, when, when Senator Burris came you know all the brouhaha was taking place. I was sworn in as CBC chair during that same week of the brouhaha, right. Bob Harris, my finance committee chair, from Oakland, thank you Bob so much for being here. {applause] Bob called me, Charles called, my first act as CBC chair was to engage in a very clear discussion about why the CBC had to take a unified position and communicate to the Senate that we wanted Senator Burris seated as our Senator. [applause] They backed down after that and I want to thank you Charles [inaudible] thank you Bob. [applause] And that was a tough one, because you know we were just getting back into, uh, session, just elected a CBC chair, I said, oh my goodness, this is gonna be my task, baptism in fire. But I wanna thank forty-two members strong CBC, they got it immediately. There would, there really wasn’t any debate about that. They understood the constitutional issues, they understood that we needed a voice in the Senate, and they knew that he must be seated. And so, I just have to say to the CBC, uh, publicly, thank them for, for that first act, making it such a successful, uh, first act.

I have to, uh, also remind you now about the CBC. It was founded in nineteen seventy-one.  Thirteen members. The CBC continues its role as the conscience of the Congress.  And we are the conscience of the Congress [voice: “That’s right, that’s right.”] . We know that we have not a political but a moral responsibility mind you. This is a moral responsibility to address the issues of, of inequality and injustice. We have to do this and now is our moment to move forward with the NAACP to begin to close these, what we call, moral gaps.  When you look at the NAACP’s legislative priorities, and I just have to say again to Hilary how much I appreciate his hard work and his commitment and his brilliance, because we work so closely together, when you look at this, and he’s gonna get you the CBC’s agenda, each member submitted one bill, we call, our bills to watch. You look at the, the NAACP’s legislative agenda, very consistent, very consistent. We speak with one voice, we’re working together on our Washington agenda, which is not only an agenda to begin to close these moral gaps in the African-American community, but really begins to close these gaps so that America, of course, can be stronger and the American dream can be realized for all. And so these forty-two bills to watch are opportunities for all, pathways out of poverty. The agenda really is the agenda of the NAACP. And so I just want to thank you Hilary again and thank all of you for making sure that we are able to move this agenda forward.

Now let me tell you about the Senate. You heard Senator Burris, he, he, he got down on them. And I just have to tell you a couple of things that, that as the CBC we’ve been doing. You know we’ve been working very hard to get, uh, a jobs bill passed. Uh, Senator Burris mentioned summer youth jobs. I mean, we have been dogging this for months now. Our young people need jobs. They need jobs not only to help build their resume and to give them the work experience, but with this economic downturn they need jobs to help their families [voice: “That’s right.”] put food on the table [voice: “That’s right.”] and pay the rent. They need a job. And so the CBC has been pushing forward, we first had three billion, then we had to pare it down to two billion, and then one point five, we finally got one billion into the House bill several times ’cause we said we weren’t gonna do, we weren’t gonna vote for anything if it didn’t have our bill, our money in it. We got it in, of course, where is it
now? Languishing in the Senate and summer is half way over. So went over several weeks ago to Senator McConnell’s office, CBC members, and we delivered letters for Senator McConnell  and we asked for a meeting and we’re still waiting to get that meeting, but we delivered a letter to members of the Senate who have high rates of unemployment and high rates, high numbers and percentages of African-Americans. We said to Senator McConnell and the senators, we said, you may not know this, but, in your state you have maybe twelve percent African-Americans, you have a fifteen percent unemployment rate, why don’t you get with the program? You know, you’ve got people who are desperate for jobs who haven’t benefitted from this economic recovery. And so I think, I, I’m sharing that because you need to know that inside of the House of Representatives with the CBC not only are we working with our leadership in the House, but we’re trying to help Senator Burris by making sure that his colleagues understand that they are NAACP chapters in their districts, there are people of color, there are African-Americans, there are Latinos in their districts and they need to be accountable. They need to be accountable. And if they’re not accountable, once again, we have to unleash our power at that ballot box. [voice: “That’s right.”] And that’s the only way justice will be served in our country, is unleashing our power. This is a defining moment. We have a president in the White House, Barack Obama, who gets it. We helped elect the greatest president ever. [voice: “Right on.”, applause] The African-American community did that. And he has done a phenomenal job. When you look at health care reform, I mean this was a hard bill to pass. [voice: “That’s right.”] And you know that. But because he was determined, and the Congressional Black Caucus, we had to work very hard with the President to make sure that our issues on health care reform were not dropped from the table. And I’m gonna tell you what some of them were. One is closing health disparity. You know in our communities diabetes, HIV and AIDS, heart disease, all the health disparities in our community have been totally neglected. And so under the leadership of the Congressional Black Caucus, Congresswoman Donna Christensen who’s a wonderful medical doctor as well as member of Congress from the Virgin Islands, she chairs our health task force, we went to the President. We had several meetings with him and the White House staff and said there is no way the Congressional Black Caucus can support this health bill if our health disparities provision aren’t included, if our minority medical colleges aren’t provided for in terms of equal funding, if in fact we don’t expand community clinics, if in fact we don’t do x, y, z. And we had a whole list, I call, of demands. [voice: “Um, hm.”] Well, I want you to know, the President got it. He said yes, we can. We put those provisions in the House bill, those and then some. Got that House bill to the Senate – Rolland remembers – those provisions were dropped just like that. I said, wait a minute [voice: “Um, hmm.”], call Senator Burris, call Harry Reid, [inaudible] we had a conference call. Well I want you to know within sixty minutes those provisions, thanks to Senator Burris, were [laughter] restored [applause] in the bill. [applause] In the bill. You wasn’t gonna vote for it unless it had ’em  in it, that’s right. You told everybody that, and we communicated that. But it couldn’t have happened, again, had they not known that Hilary [Shelton] was watching and waiting and, and in those offices. And that you at our state level were sending those e-mails, communicating to those Senators, saying, look, this health bill has got to have provisions that really begin to close these huge health disparities in the commun, in our communities of color and in the Black community.  And so I share that one piece of information and story with you because I think that shows how, if we speak with one voice and if we do what Hilary and the NAACP and what your chapter presidents are asking you to do we will unleash our power in a big way. [applause] In a big way. [applause] In a big way.

‘Course it’s not a perfect bill. It has its flaws. But, guess what? We’re going back to the drawing board to try to make sure that where it’s not a perfect bill it becomes a perfect, well, a perfect law that now becomes a more perfect law. And so we’re gonna work on those provisions that still, we think, need to be put in to place, such as, I don’t know if all of you support this, but I know most of you support it, public option. [voice: “All right.”, applause] We’re working on getting that back in to the bill. [applause]

The ongoing, uh, BP oil spill in the Gulf is really a, a painful, a very sad reminder of the urgent need for our nation to develop and implement climate change options. [applause] Right, we know what that’s about. [applause] Alternative energy solutions. And strengthening environmental justice efforts. Yesterday, and I think Lisa, the Administrator of the EPA spoke to you about why the Black community has got to be engaged in this debate. We’re in Congressman Emanuel Cleaver’s district as we speak and he has been phenomenal. Emanuel serves as the First Vice-Chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. He’s been phenomenal  and on that committee making sure that, he co-chairs the energy task force for the CBC, he and Jackson Lee and, uh, G.K. Butterfield, they’ve been unbelievable in championing the causes of environmental justice and making sure in the energy bill that we passed out of the House includes provisions that insure that our communities benefit from the jobs that are gonna be created as well as don’t pay the price, uh, in terms of  the cap and trade formulas. So they’ve been phenomenal in how they have addressed this, the bill that left the House is a good bill. it could have been perfect, but it wasn’t, coming from my district, I mean, there were some provisions that caused, uh, some of us heartburn.  But it was the best bill we could get. Now it’s languishing, where? [crosstalk] [Senator Rolland Burris: Where is it?  Where is it?] Where is the bill? [Senator Rolland Burris: Where is the bill?] In the Senate. [Senator Rolland Burris: Where is the bill?] [laughter] So when you go home, call your senators and tell them you gotta, we gotta pass this energy bill because the Gulf oil spill now is a horrible reminder of the job that we must do. Again, we have a moral responsibility also to those who have lost their job, to help them recover, to the survivors of Katrina, five years, many many challenges still being faced by the people in the Gulf region and in New Orleans. And again, I know that’s part of the NAACP’s legislative agenda.

I want to say, finally, in closing, um, that I’ve got to thank you for staying the course and staying vigilant because I don’t know what we’d do without you. CBC, forty-two members, these are, forty-two members of the Congressional Black Caucus are the hardest working and smartest members of Congress. I know that. [applause] I know that. I know that. They couldn’t do anything, we couldn’t do anything without you. It’s an uphill battle, constantly, we’re playing offense and defense. Offense and defense. We’re watching the President’s back, we’re working the, with the President, letting him know what we see coming down the pike so we can circle the wagons. And we’re making sure that all of us stay on track.

November is coming up. And I tell you one thing, we have to cast our vote in November, we have to get people mobilized [applause] and organized. [applause] We have to do that. Ten-two-ten is coming up.  And ten-two-ten is gonna be a very important moment in Washington, D.C. and I’m sure know, and Hilary’s been talking about ten-two-ten. We have to have that massive mobilization because that’s how we deal with the tea party [voices: “Yeah.”] and all of these, these, this noise, which is what it is, that’s out there. We have to make more noise. [voices: “Yes.”] We have to keep that street heat on. And we
have to push forward to make sure that not only our votes are cast, but that they are counted and that we move forward unleashing our power. As Frederick Douglass said, if you remember this now, power concedes nothing. I don’t care who’s in that White House. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has, it never will, and that is what we must do as the NAACP. [applause] Thank you again.

Previously:

The 101st NAACP National Convention in Kansas City

NAACP in Kansas City: Benjamin Todd Jealous at the opening press conference

NAACP in Kansas City: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson at the opening press conference

NAACP in Kansas City: report on the impact of the BP oil spill in the Gulf region

NAACP in Kansas City: Sunday – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Michelle Obama – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Representative Sheila Jackson Lee on the tea party and human rights

NAACP in Kansas City: Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – “Now is no time to quit.”

NAACP in Kansas City: Representative Emanuel Cleaver – “Don’t you forget it!”

NAACP in Kansas City: Wednesday afternoon press conference – photos

NAACP in Kansas City: Rev. Al Sharpton – “There clearly is some racial leaves in their tea bag…”

NAACP in Kansas City: Rev. Jesse Jackson – “We want jobs, justice, and education for all.”

NAACP in Kansas City: Benjamin Todd Jealous – “…we all need a testament of hope…”

NAACP in Kansas City: press conference Q and A – “…we’ll keep our eyes on that prize…”

Obama: "…they've finally decided to make their stand on the backs of the unemployed…"

17 Saturday Jul 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Obama, Obstructionism, republicans, unemployment, weekly address, White House

“….Public schools are closing. Teachers are being laid off by the thousands. First class jails and second class schools. Today there is a plan, a plan for comprehensive immigration reform. A plan for Afghanistan, we commit resources, a hundred billion dollars for a hundred Al  Qaeda. A plan, don’t ask, don’t tell, for gays. A plan for national reform. But no plan for the investment for urban policy to put America back to work. So, we bail out the predators, the bankers that drove us in this hole. The victims remain on the sideline desperately looking for a job….” – Reverend Jesse Jackson, NAACP National Convention, July 14, 2010.

“….Suddenly, Republican leaders want to change that. They say we shouldn’t provide unemployment insurance because it costs money.  So after years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, including a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, they’ve finally decided to make their stand on the backs of the unemployed.  They’ve got no problem spending money on tax breaks for folks at the top who don’t need them and didn’t even ask for them; but they object to helping folks laid off in this recession who really do need help.  And every day this goes on, another 50,000 Americans lose that badly needed lifeline….” President Obama, weekly address, July 17, 2010.

Oh, the republicans have a plan for November 2010.

President Obama’s weekly address for July 17, 2010:

The White House transcript:

Remarks of President Barack Obama

Weekly Address

The White House

July 17, 2010

This week, many of our largest corporations reported robust earnings – a positive sign of growth.

But too many of our small business owners and those who aspire to start their own small businesses continue to struggle, in part because they can’t get the credit they need to start up, grow, and hire.  And too many Americans whose livelihoods have fallen prey to the worst recession in our lifetimes – a recession that cost our economy eight million jobs – still wonder how they’ll make ends meet.

That’s why we need to take new, commonsense steps to help small businesses, grow our economy, and create jobs – and we need to take them now.

For months, that’s what we’ve been trying to do.  But too often, the Republican leadership in the United States Senate chooses to filibuster our recovery and obstruct our progress.  And that has very real consequences.

Consider what that obstruction means for our small businesses – the growth engines that create two of every three new jobs in this country.  A lot of small businesses still have trouble getting the loans and capital they need to keep their doors open and hire new workers.  So we proposed steps to get them that help:  Eliminating capital gains taxes on investments.  Establishing a fund for small lenders to help small businesses.  Enhancing successful SBA programs that help them access the capital they need.

But again and again, a partisan minority in the Senate said “no,” and used procedural tactics to block a simple, up-or-down vote.

Think about what these stalling tactics mean for the millions of Americans who’ve lost their jobs since the recession began.  Over the past several weeks, more than two million of them have seen their unemployment insurance expire.  For many, it was the only way to make ends meet while searching for work – the only way to cover rent, utilities, even food.

Three times, the Senate has tried to temporarily extend that emergency assistance.  And three times, a minority of Senators – basically the same crowd who said “no” to small businesses – said “no” to folks looking for work, and blocked a straight up-or-down vote.

Some Republican leaders actually treat this unemployment insurance as if it’s a form of welfare. They say it discourages folks from looking for work.  Well, I’ve met a lot of folks looking for work these past few years, and I can tell you, I haven’t met any Americans who would rather have an unemployment check than a meaningful job that lets you provide for your family.  And we all have friends, neighbors, or family members who already knows how hard it is to land a job when five workers are competing for every opening.

Now in the past, Presidents and Congresses of both parties have treated unemployment insurance for what it is – an emergency expenditure.  That’s because an economic disaster can devastate families and communities just as surely as a flood or tornado.

Suddenly, Republican leaders want to change that.  They say we shouldn’t provide unemployment insurance because it costs money.  So after years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, including a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, they’ve finally decided to make their stand on the backs of the unemployed.  They’ve got no problem spending money on tax breaks for folks at the top who don’t need them and didn’t even ask for them; but they object to helping folks laid off in this recession who really do need help.  And every day this goes on, another 50,000 Americans lose that badly needed lifeline.

Well, I think these Senators are wrong.  We can’t afford to go back to the same misguided policies that led us into this mess.  We need to move forward with the policies that are leading us out of this mess.

The fact is, most economists agree that extending unemployment insurance is one of the single most cost-effective ways to help jumpstart the economy.  It puts money into the pockets of folks who not only need it most, but who also are most likely to spend it quickly.  That boosts local economies.  And that means jobs.

Increasing loans to small business.  Renewing unemployment insurance.  These steps aren’t just the right thing to do for those hardest hit by the recession – they’re the right thing to do for all of us.  And I’m calling on Congress once more to take these steps on behalf of America’s workers, and families, and small business owners – the people we were sent here to serve.

Because when storms strike Main Street, we don’t play politics with emergency aid.  We don’t desert our fellow Americans when they fall on hard times.  We come together.  We do what we can to help.  We rebuild stronger, and we move forward.  That’s what we’re doing today.  And I’m absolutely convinced that’s how we’re going to come through this storm to better days ahead.

Thanks.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Big Boy, No. 4014
  • Campaign Finance: next, you need to vote
  • Yes, he really is that stupid
  • Campaign Finance: Maryland, Virginia, whatever…
  • Campaign Finance: from Alabama to Dittmer

Recent Comments

Yes, he really is th… on Mark Alford (r) –…
Campaign Finance: Ma… on Campaign Finance: Missouri is…
Campaign Finance: Ma… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: fr… on Campaign Finance: the money be…
Campaign Finance: fr… on Campaign Finance: dismantle th…

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,058,511 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...