Amy Smoucha has worked on health care issues for
Jobs with Justice for three years now. That’s dozens of months, hundreds of weeks, and thousands of hours. And that makes her expertise on the subject worth listening to. So I did. When the e-mail below arrived in my inbox, I paid attention–especially to her fourth point.
In fact, within a few days, I will write in more detail about the “national, non-profit, publicly accountable option for health insurance coverage” contained in the Senate bill. Suffice it for now to say that rather than fight the screaming mob about the public option, the Senate did an end run: it eliminated that program and substituted a plan that has the potential–minus the right wing hysteria–to achieve the same thing. An analysis of how useful (or less than) those two programs may turn out to be will be part of my upcoming posting.
But for now, see what Amy thinks of the progress Democrats have made so far:
An open letter to progressives: ideology kills people
I have been amazed at the rancor and deceit that many politically “right wing” and conservative leaders have demonstrated during the long, heated struggle to pass health reform legislation. I’m amazed that for political, partisan and ideological reasons, Republicans and Libertarians are willing to lie to their own voters. I’m awestruck at the monumental steps people are taking to protect corporations, defend outrageous profits and protect a status quo that working people in any political party cannot afford much longer.
Of course, we expect that sort of vitriol and cynicism from the right wing and from conservative political operatives who have lost ground in the last election and are bitterly losing the health care fight.
I am having a much harder time understanding the fierce attack by some folks who are thoughtful, independently-minded and progressive. Like any significant human and civil rights struggle, we are in a place where we’ve won a lot, we’ve lost some of our demands, and there’s more work to be done to get a final bill out of conference. Both the House and Senate health care bills represent an incredible step toward real, affordable, quality health care for every person in our country. Neither of them accomplish everything we need.
I hope we all evaluate the bills and what they accomplish based on the ambitious reforms they include and an understanding of the context in which the measures are proposed. The bils do many things for our communities–like funding clinics and doctors. It’s important to consider the flaws in the bills alongside a balanced understanding of just a few examples of what we are gaining and winning:
1. The Senate bill delivers health coverage to 94% of Americans –31 million uninsured people will gain access to affordable health coverage. (The House bill would cover 36 million-95%.)
2. The proposed expansion of Medicaid will provide a lifeline to 15 million low-income and disabled Americans. Congress is about to enact a significant expansion of Medicaid for both individuals and families up to 133% of the federal poverty level. Currently in Missouri a family of three is eligible for the state health insurance program if their income is less than $292 a month. Both House and Senate bills lift the income rules for the whole country to about $2029 a month for that same family of three. For the first time adults without dependent children will get this coverage. These 15 million uninsured, low income individuals will gain insurance through a public health insurance program that is affordable and has very nominal out of pocket costs. This provision will help laid-off workers and part-time workers. This expansion will revolutionize life for people with disabilities and people living with mental illnesses. For many of us, when disability strikes, we will no longer have to prove that we are “permanently and totally disabled” and unable to work just to have access to the public option of Medicaid. We won’t have to stop working just to get health care.
3. Corporate abuses are curtailed and health Insurance companies have been significantly pushed back in both bills. The Senate bill went much farther than we imagined in reining in insurance company abuses. What’s really in the Senate bill? Insurance companies will not be able to turn us down or charge us more if we have pre-existing medical conditions. Insurers will be required to spend 85 cents out of every dollar they receive in premiums on health care rather than profits and administrative costs. If not, people would receive rebates from their insurance companies for the difference. Insurance companies will be banned from issuing policies that have lifetime or annual limits on benefits. Consumers gain the right to an independent appeal of any decision by an insurer to deny coverage.
4. Both the House and Senate bills bill create a national, non-profit, publicly accountable option for health insurance coverage. The House bill contains a national public insurance option. However, even in the Senate bill, people purchasing insurance in the Exchange will be able to choose from national plans, including at least one non-profit plan, supervised by the same department of the federal government that selects health insurance plans for federal employees. Before the recent invention of a “public plan” demand, progressive health care activists were asking Congress to either open up Medicare for all or allow people to buy into the plans administered by the Office of Professional Management-the same plans that Congress and Federal employees have. We just won a long-standing demand.
5. We cannot “start over” and get more progressive reform through Congress any time soon. Getting landmark legislation passed is a treacherous, long chess game, especially when that legislation has powerful corporate enemies or extends significant civil and human rights. Unprecedented political capital and economic capital have been spent-the years spent making health reform a key issue in the last election, the storybanks, the canvasses, the phone calling. We all put our best game on the field. It’s time for a final push to improve the legislation in conference committee and to plan on how we will take this momentum and build and expand on our victory. Many leaders in the health reform movement predict that if health reform fails now, we will not have another meaningful effort for 15 to 20 years, if at all. If health reform fails now, the insurance companies and for profit health care corporations will laugh (at us) all the way to the board room.
This fight has been long and vicious because Congress is creating federal rules that make insurance companies behave. Insurance companies are going to be regulated, and they don’t like it. So much is at stake. It is very dangerous to forgo these incredible victories because they are not far enough, especially since losing means millions of struggling Americans will have to continue in the health care system as it is for many, many years. I’ve spent the last three years talking to hard working people throughout Missouri who will get real, measurable, concrete help from these legislative changes. For some of them, their lives literally hang in the balance. We have a responsibility to stand beside and for the uninsured working people who will gain much from these bills.
As a few progressive groups send emails around to “kill the bill” (along with the tea party) or “a bad bill is worse than no bill,” insurance companies and right wing political operatives throw fuel on that fire. All of us should deeply consider the consequences of
squandering this opportunity to move our health care system several strides forward. Kill the bill, and insurance companies win. I believe we are better than that.
folks who fight hard for the best solutions, but remain pragmatic and forward looking at the same time seem to be in short supply. I am very willing to go after politicians who disappoint me – but only when I think that I might get more by doing so than what I stand to loose.
Which means that I am very disturbed when I see Jane Hamsher and Grover Norquist making common cause – no matter that some folks at FDL think that she is skillfully managing a “pincer” movement to outflank the enemy – in my book the “enemy” here is not clearly defined; and, of course, a pincer strategy employs different bodies of the same army – otherwise the weakest flank might find itself on the chopping block after the pincer move has been successfully executed. This is a strategy that can only be counted on to work long-term when the two arms of the pincer have common goals beyond crushing some amorphous “enemy.”
Will the fixes occur during my lifetime? How does the Dem Party plan to re-energize its demoralized base? A final bill that strips insurance companies of their immunity from anti-trust laws would be nice.
Done any phone banking lately? The base demonstrated its support. Now they’re bewildered and disappointed by Dem concessions. Many who are not directly affected by proposed changes don’t sound victorious.
of clarifying the issues and her arguments for settling for this considerably less reform than we need are reasonable. However, I am one of the many who are just fed up with Dems and Repugs. Most are selfish pigs and liars. Strategy: take what you want for yourself and protect your corporate kitties, then do a song and dance for the poor fools who trusted you. Everyone will forget by and by and later you can pull the same crap again. Well, I quit!!! I think nothing will change until the economic pain and personal desperation is spread more widely and deeply than it is now. I’m not sure how widespread (20%, 30%, 50%, 70%)the agony will have to be before real change comes (pitchforks in the street?) But until then we are like the proverbial frog in the slowly heating water. Hopefully enough will feel the heat before our “frog” is cooked. Wake up, progressives. We have been sold out by the Blue Dogs and their pretend-progressive colleagues. There is no change here. Trust me, the insurance companies will easily find a way to keep on bleeding the public…only now with a mandate!
is the attack from this “reform:” bill on female reproductive rights. It would seem to me that this bill will take women’s reproductive health care more than several steps backward.
Insofar as Congress creating federal rules to make insurance companies “behave”(?), I am not going to hold my breath in anticipation of those “behavioral” rules having a few teeth.