• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: March 2008

Sarah Steelman (r): the facts are just so bothersome…

17 Monday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

…but she sure can read the polls.

Two years ago I could see it coming. The republicans were telegraphing their play book for 2008 way back in 2006.

Immigration.

In Missouri:

February 2008 SurveyUSA

12% – Immigration is most important issue for next president

January 2008 SurveyUSA

9% – Immigration is most important issue for next president

December 2007 SurveyUSA

9% – Immigration is most important issue for next president

Well, the poll numbers are going the direction the republicans want, but for announced candidate for governor and present State Treasurer Sarah Steelman (r) the facts are just too inconvenient:

Missouri treasurer misread illegal immigration study

By KIT WAGAR

The Star’s Jefferson City correspondent

In her first big policy foray since jumping into the race for governor, Missouri Treasurer Sarah Steelman last week went after a familiar target – illegal immigrants.

The Republican presented a report to a Senate committee, expounding on the burden that illegal workers place on the state and federal government. Such workers and their employers avoided paying between $242 million and $449 million a year in income and payroll taxes for Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance, she said.

“So the problem is quite evident,” Steelman said. “It also creates an unfair advantage for employers who are not paying those taxes over companies that do pay the required taxes.”

The problem was that Steelman’s numbers were based on the misinterpretation of a nationwide study.

Steelman’s report overstated the estimate of illegal workers in Missouri by 5,800 to 10,800 workers. It overstated the unemployment rate among illegal workers by more than two-thirds. It also assumed that not a single illegal immigrant living in Missouri works for an employer who withholds and pays payroll taxes….

tiny URL

Uh, I always understood that when something was actually “evident” it was based on evidence, you know, backed by facts. Read the whole thing – I especially love the excuse offered, when confronted with the truthiness of Steelman’s testimony, that sounded similar to the old musicians’ standby: “Close enough for Jazz!”

Oh, look! Here are some facts:

Immigration irrationality

…A. Immigrants receiving free public services such as health care

Reality Check 1:

Just a small fraction of America’s health care spending is used to provide publicly supported care to the nation’s undocumented immigrants, according to a RAND Corporation study issued today.

Overall, immigrants to the United States use relatively few health services, primarily because they are generally healthier than their American-born counterparts, according to the study by the nonprofit research organization.

The report – which appears in the November edition of the journal Health Affairs – estimates that in the United States about $1.1 billion in federal, state and local government funds are spent annually on health care for undocumented immigrants aged 18 to 64.

That amounts to an average of $11 in taxes for each U.S. household.

In contrast, a total of $88 billion in government funds were spent on health care for all non-elderly adults in 2000.

Reality Check 2:

Health care expenditures are substantially lower for immigrants than for US-born persons. Our study refutes the assumption that immigrants represent a disproportionate financial burden on the US health care system.

Reality Check 3:

Despite the important role that immigrants play in the U.S. economy, they disproportionately lack health insurance and receive fewer health services than native-born Americans. Some policymakers have called for limits on immigrants’ access to health insurance, particularly Medicaid, which are even more stringent than those already in place.

However, policies that restrict immigrants’ access to some health care services lead to the inefficient and costly use of other services (such as emergency room care) and negatively impact public health.

B. Immigrants not paying taxes

Reality Check 1:

Between one-half and three-quarters of undocumented immigrants pay federal and state income taxes, Social Security taxes, and Medicare taxes. And all undocumented immigrants pay sales taxes (when they buy anything at a store, for instance) and property taxes (even if they rent housing).

Reality Check 2:

As the debate over Social Security heats up, the estimated seven million or so illegal immigrant workers in the United States are now providing the system with a subsidy of as much as $7 billion a year.

Reality Check 3:

[The Texas] Comptroller’s office estimates that state revenues collected from undocumented immigrants exceed what the state spent on services, with the difference being $424.7 million….

Go. Read the whole thing. Follow the links.

And how did we know this would be in the republican play book for 2008 way back in 2006?:

Statewide Survey of Missouri Likely Voters

Topline Data

prepared for

Center for Immigration Studies

by

the polling compan, inc.

October 2006

2. Which of the following issues do you think is most important for your elected officials to focus on right now?  (READ AND ROTATED, ACCEPTED ONLY ONE)

30%     WAR IN IRAQ/TERRORISM

23%     HEALTHCARE/PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

12%     ECONOMY/JOBS

11%     IMMIGRATION

9%    EDUCATION

9%    MORAL ISSUES LIKE ABORTION AND TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE

2%    TAXES

3%    OTHER (VOLUNTEERED)

2%    DON’T KNOW (VOLUNTEERED)

*     REFUSED (VOLUNTEERED)

3. Which of the following issues related to immigration would you say is your biggest concern?  (READ AND ROTATED)

25%     BURDEN ON TAXPAYERS, SUCH AS HEALTH CARE AND SCHOOLS

13%     COMPROMISED NATIONAL SECURITY

11%     LOSS OF AMERICAN JOBS TO IMMIGRANTS

11%     IMMIGRANTS FAILURE TO ASSIMILATE OR BECOME PART OF AMERICAN CULTURE

5%    OVERCROWDING OF US CITIES AND TOWNS

5%    INCREASED CRIME AND DRUG ACTIVITY

3%    OTHER (VOLUNTEERED)

19%     ALL OF THE ABOVE (VOLUNTEERED)

6%    NONE OF THE ABOVE (VOLUNTEERED)

2%    REFUSED (VOLUNTEERED)

9. Which immigration policy would you prefer: (ROTATED) A large scale effort to round up and deport illegal immigrants OR a policy that strictly enforces immigration laws and causes illegal immigrants to go home over time OR one that allows illegal immigrants to stay and earn their way to permanent residence and citizenship.

48%     POLICY THAT ENFORCES LAWS

24%     POLICY THAT ALLOWS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO STAY

21%     LARGE SCALE ROUND UP AND DEPORTATION

5%    DON’T KNOW/DEPENDS (VOLUNTEERED)

2%    REFUSED (VOLUNTEERED)

[emphasis added]

In looking at the crosstabulations 17% of republican, 6% of Democrats, and 10% of Independents thought that Immigration was the most important issue for elected officials (October 2006).

The biggest concern when it came to Immigration was the “burden on taxpayers such as healthcare and schools” with 29% of republicans, 25% of Democrats, and 21% of Independents agreeing (October 2006).

Yep, Sarah Steelman can read poll numbers – and she knows how to cater to people who find facts inconvenient, you know, the republican base.

The deity looks aft
er fools and idiots, it’s just that everyone else suffers…

Missouri House: The inmates are in charge of the asylum.

17 Monday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

H.J.R. 41, immigration, Jane Cunningham, Jim Lembke, Pratt

What we get from this Republican legislature is so far from sensible, often with a subtext of threat, as to border on nutso. For example, the House just gave first-round approval to HB 1463, which bans enrollment at public Missouri colleges and universities for the entire .1 percent of illegal immigrants now attending them. Big whoop. As minority leader Paul LeVota pointed out:

“People don’t come to the state of Missouri so they can go to college, they come to work. This bill does nothing to solve these problems.”

Also in the sharkwatch on the Mississippi category of legislation is HJR 41, a bill for a constitutional amendment (another  in the plethora of useless, dangerous proposed amendments) that would ban Missouri judges from imposing taxes without voter approval.  As if they ever had. In some other states judges have done so, including in Kansas (omigod, right next door: the sky is falling, the sky is falling). And once, twenty years ago, a federal judge ordered the state to pay for teacher salary increases in Kansas City.

Undeterred by the lack of examples to prove the necessity of this amendment, Rep. Jane Cunningham (R-Chesterfield, running for the senate) said: “They [those treasonous judges, I presume] are on our doorstep. We have a clear and present danger right across the street.”

Her horror of judges would be laughable if it didn’t remind me so much of Pervez Musharraf kicking Pakistan’s chief justice off the supreme court. Naturally, I can’t claim that Cunningham has done anything as radical as that, but only because she can’t. She and her cohorts are still bound by due process.

Nevertheless, Pervez Cunningham and Rep. Pervez Lembke (R-District 85–running for the senate, pictured at left) are doing all they can to intimidate judges. Last January, Lembke proposed impeaching a judge in Osage Beach for ruling the “wrong” way in a child custody case. As a judge, Christine Hutson is bound by law to keep quiet about the case, but look who defended her:

Hutson’s defenders – including the Republican legislator from her town – say she is a respected judge who weighed mounds of evidence and followed the recommendation of the children’s court-appointed attorney.

“Any time you tear something apart, it can get ugly,” said Rep. Darrell Pollock, R-Lebanon. “Somebody’s a winner and somebody’s a loser. … I just question why we would be taking this two- or three-minute look at what this case was, and coming up with an idea that we could impeach this judge.”

Lembke may have abandoned the impeachment idea by now, for all I know. It doesn’t matter. The point’s been made. To anybody thinking of leaving private practice for the bench: think about it. If you’re not a Republican, do you want to take a cut in pay for the privilege of facing similar harassment? And if you’re already a judge, do you want to render a judgment that might get one of these pitbulls coming after you?

(On Wednesday, I’ll write about the centerpiece of this year’s attack on our judiciary, the Republican attempt to do away with the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan.)

But back to HJR 41. It looks to be headed for the ballot, and you can get an approximate sense of “justice” under Republicans by looking at how they conducted debate about the proposed amendment:

Legislators gave initial approval to the proposal Tuesday in a controversial move. After about 10 minutes of debate, Speaker Pro Tem Bryan Pratt, R-Blue Springs, called for closing remarks from Cunningham, even though several Democrats were standing and Rep. J.C. Kuessner, D-Eminence, says he was waving his hand, asking to speak.

For his part, Pratt said: “Nobody was seeking recognition. There wasn’t a single hand in the air.”

As usual, they notice no irony in telling judges what’s fair while exhibiting no clue about fairness themselves.

Got Milk?

16 Sunday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

hormones in milk, rBGH

Got milk?

If so, maybe you also got hormones and antibiotics you didn’t know about or want. Food and Water Watch sent me an e-mail about a hormone many dairy producers use:

Known as rBGH or rBST, the genetically engineered hormone is injected into cows to make them produce more milk. Besides the documented increase of infections in dairy cows injected with rBGH, which necessitates increased use of antibiotics, there are ongoing questions about links to cancer in humans.  As a result, most of the industrialized countries in the world don’t allow the use of this hormone, including Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and all 27 countries in the European Union.

Some smart consumers only buy milk that doesn’t have rBGH in it, but now, in Missouri, Monsanto is pushing House Bill 2283 to keep farmers who don’t use rBGH from mentioning that fact on their packaging.

Legislators can’t possibly justify wrapping adhesive tape around the mouths of dairy farmers who do the job right. It’s unconscionable.

Food and Water Watch has successfully gotten activists to halt similar bills in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, and New Jersey. Now they’re urging Missourians to take action, and they’ve made it easy for you to send your representative an e-mail protesting this bill.

MO House 2008: The Current Playing Field

16 Sunday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 7 Comments

With seven more days to file (until Tuesday the 25th), it’s time to take a look at the current field.

In order to break down this field, we’ll divide the state into 9 regions, as approximated in this map (some districts will cross over county lines.

The overall breakdown of the regions

Region 1 (STL City): 10 Democrats

Region 2 (STL Suburbs): 11 Republicans, 6 Democrats

Region 3 (STL County): 18 Democrats, 12 Republicans

Region 4 (West-Central): 17 Republicans, 2 Democrats

Region 5 (KCMO): 14 Democrats, 5 Republicans

Region 6 (Northwest): 10 Republicans, 5 Democrats

Region 7 (Southwest): 22 Republicans, 2 Democrats

Region 8 (Southeast): 9 Republicans, 7 Democrats

Region 9 (Northeast): 7 Democrats, 6 Democrats

Now there’s more under the fold.

Overall, there are 35 open seats from what I have noticed. The accuracy of that is probably not 100% and if I made any errors, feel free to point them out.

18 Republicans and 17 Democrats will be leaving the Assembly after this session.

Now let’s go to the region-by-region summaries

STL City-

Open: HD58, 61, 63, 67, 108

Not Open: HD57, 59, 60, 64, 65

Currently no Republicans have filed in any of these districts. Nine of these 10 districts were uncontested in 2006.

HD58: James Morris and Sam Coleman have filed to replace Rodney Hubbard (who is running in SD5)

HD61: Chris Carter and Curtis Royston have filed to replace Connie Johnson (who is termed out)

HD63: Tishaura Jones and April Harris have filed to replace Robin Wright Jones (who is running in SD5)

HD67: Mike Colona, Chad Beffa, and Joan Landmann have filed to replace Mike Daus (who is termed out)

HD108: Jacob Hummel has filed to replace Tom Villa (who is termed out)

Overall, don’t expect anything too exciting after August here. Unless something goes epically wrong.

STL Suburbs (HD 11 thru 19, 90, 98, 101 through 103, 105, 109, and 111)-

Open Seats

HD13: Chuck Gatschenberger (R) and Kevin Kuhlmann (R) are running to replace Bob Onder (R) (who is running for Congress)

HD18: Anne Zerr and Matthew Seeds are running for the Republican nod for the long-vacant 18th district. Tim Swope is running for the Democratic nod.

HD109: Scott Dieckhaus (R), Laura Elizabeth Sprehe (R), Kent Cunningham (D), and Donald D. Meyer (D) are running to fill the seat opened up by Kevin Threlkeld’s candidacy for Franklin County Treasurer. Threlkeld was unopposed in 2006.

Seats without a Democratic party candidate so far: HD12, HD13 (no candidate in 06), HD14, and HD19.

Seats without a Republican party candidate: HD11, HD90, HD101, HD102, HD103, HD105 (why yes, no Democrat is opposed so far)

Seats of interest:

HD15 (50/48 in 06, Faith v. Michael Niemeyer?)

HD16 (recently filled seat, rematch from Feb 08 [Parkinson/Fann])

HD17 (51/49 in 06, rematch between Schneider and Biermann)

HD18 (vacant seat, 53/47 in 06), HD98 (58/42 in 06, possible rematch).

With at least four Republican seats in play, this should be an area of interest.

STL County (HD66, 69-89, 91-97, and 100)

6 Democratic seats are open, 5 Republican seats are open

Open Democratic seats:

HD70: Sharon Pace and Jack Chase are running to fill the seat that is currently vacant due to the resignation of John Bowman.

HD71: Roger Wilson (no not that one), Don Calloway, and Vernon Harlan are running here (Esther Haywood is termed out).

HD73: Stacey Newman (D) and Steve Brown (D) are running here, Daniel F. O’Sullivan Jr. (R) is also running (this seat is open due to the Attorney General candidacy of Margaret Donnelly)

HD78: Margo McNeil is the only filed candidate to fill the seat opened by the Treasurer candidacy of Clint Zweifel.

HD81: Rochelle Walton Gray and Don Krank are filed to replace Juanita Head Walton (who is termed out, and challenging Timothy Green for the State Senate)

HD82: Jill Schupp (D) and Terry Frank (R) are the only filed candidates for the seat opened up by the Lt. Gubernatorial candidacy of Sam Page.

As to the dynamics and primary odds, someone else can fill us in on that.

Open Republican seats:

HD85: Vicki Lorenz Englund (D), Ron Wagganer (D), and Cloria Brown (R) are candidates for the seat of Jim Lembke (who is running for the State Senate)

HD86 (Chesterfield): Dick Riley (R), Robin Harris (R), Dave Countie (R), Kyle Tate (R), Joseph Gambino (D), and Marty Ott (D) are running to fill the seat of Jane Cunningham (who is termed out and running for the State Senate)

HD88 (Ballwin/Winchester): Chris Howard (R), Shamed Dogan (R), and Andrew Koenig (R) are running to fill the seat held by Neal C. St. Onge (who is termed out and running for the State Senate)

HD91: Joan McGivney (R), Randy Jotte (R), Jeanne Kirkton (D), and Katherine Bruckner (D) are running to fill the seat of Kathlyn Fares (who is termed out)

HD92: Sue Allen (R) and Ronica “Ronnie” Herman (D) are running to fill Chuck Portwood’s seat (who is termed out).

Seats uncontested by Republicans so far: HD69 through 77, HD79 through 81, HD83, HD96, and HD100 (15 uncontested)

Seats uncontested by Democrats so far: HD84, HD88, HD93, HD95

Seats of interest-

HD82 (Open seat)

HD85 (52/48 in 06, open)

HD91 (51/49 in 06, open)

HD94 (51/49 in 06, Deb Lavender is running)

I’d put HD93 on the list, if a candidate was running.

Overall: Four seats of interest, perhaps more ripe seats due to five Republican seats being open in St. Louis County.

West Central Missouri (HD26, 112-125, 146, 148, 155)

Open seats-

HD120 (mainly Henry County): Scott N. Largent (R), Orval Lee Page (R), and Kristi Kenney (D) are running to fill the seat of Shannon Cooper (who is termed out)

HD121 (Warrensburg): Denny Hoskins (R), Jim Jackson (D), and Art Arton (D) are running to fill the seat of David Pearce (who is running in SD31).

HD123 (Belton/Raymore): Chris Molendorp (R-Belton) and Raymore Mayor Juan Alonzo (D) are running to fill the seat of Brian L. Baker.

HD149 (Rolla): Dan W Brown (R), Dave Keller (R), and Wayne Bledsoe (D) are running to fill the seat of Bob May (who is termed out).

Uncontested seats

Joe Aull (D-Marshall) doesn’t have an opponent (and he didn’t have one in 2006).

HD112 through 117 are uncontested, HD119, 146, and 148 are also uncontested.

Seats of interest:

HD120 is a winnable seat. Henry County went for McCaskill. HD121 is also winnable. I’ve also heard good things in regards to HD122 where Beth Grubb is running against Michael McGhee. Hopefully a good run can be made from HD120 to even HD123 (although I can’t tell you much about the demographics of HD123). HD149 might surprise you too. Depending on how the cards fall (preceding not an addition of HD149 to the list).

As for the uncontested seats, I will note that Lucas Kunce only lost 56/44 to Mark Bruns in HD113.

West-Central Missouri could be pretty helpful this November.

Jackson County (HD37, 39 through 56)

HD43, 44, and 49 (maybe?) are open.

In HD43, Annmarie Jackson and Roman Edward Lee are running to fill the seat of Craig Bland (who is termed out)

In HD44, Jason Kander, Amy Coffman, and Mary Cosgrove Spence are running to fill the seat of Jenee’ Lowe (who is termed out)

In HD49, either it’s a primary battle or an open seat. I didn’t find anything one way or another here. Tom McDonald and Jason Parson are running. Terry Young might be too.

Note: In HD40 (Northeast KC/Riverfront), JJ Rizzo will be facing John Patrick Burnett for the third cycle in a row (Burnett won by a 841-834 margin in 2006). If Burnett wins again, then this will be the final meeting between the two for the state house. If Rizzo wins, then we could have three more meetings between them (at the most).

Uncontested seats: Every Democrat in Jackson County other than Curt “Bud” Dougherty is un
opposed. Brent Lasater is running against Dougherty, no word on if the Coors/Miller alliance will get involved. Overall in Jackson County: 13 uncontested Dems right now.

Pratt (HD55) and Yates (HD56) are uncontested right now.

Seats of interest

HD47: Jason Norbury (who ran for the State Senate against Matt Bartle in 06) is running against Jeff Grisamore. Grisamore won the open seat by a 51/49 margin in 2006.

HD48: Joe Volpe and former Rep. Mike Sager are running against Will Kraus. Kraus won 52/48 over Chris Moreno in 2006.

Northwest Missouri (HD3-5, 7, 27-38)

Open seats

HD3: 2006 candidate Casey Guernsey (R) and Mike Hepler (D-Browning) are running for the seat of Jim Whorton (who is termed out).

HD7: Dale Wallace (R), Mike Lair (R), and Harry Wyse (D) are running to fill the seat of John Quinn (who is termed out)

Uncontested seats

Uncontested by the Republicans: HD27, HD29, HD31, HD32

Uncontested by the Democrats: HD4 (Thomson, R-Maryville), HD28 (Schaaf, R-St. Joseph), HD30 (Brown, R-Platte City), HD34 (Flook, R-Liberty).

Seats of interest

HD3: This is probably the hardest seat to hold. But hopefully it can be pulled off.

HD5: Mike Waltemath is aiming for a rematch with Ron Paul supporter Jim Guest. Waltemath lost 51/49 in 2006.

HD33: Terry Stone is also aiming for a rematch with Jerry Nolte. Stone lost 51/49 in 2006.

HD36 and HD38 might be seats of interest. HD36 is in the blue Ray County. HD38 is in Northern KC (North of Gladstone). It depends on the winds.

Southwest Missouri (HD62, 68, 126-145, 147, 151)

Open seats-

HD136 (Springfield): Eric Burlison (R) and Nick Beatty (D) are running to fill the seat opened by B. J. Marsh (who is termed out)

HD144: Del Davis (R) and Dennis Lee Chilton (D) are running to fill the seat opened by Van Kelly (who is also termed out)

Uncontested seats

No Dems have filed in HD68, 126-131, 133-134, 139-142, 145, 147, and 151 (16 Districts)

Seats of interest

HD132 is notable since Dake was elected in 2006. But I’m not going to quite put it on the list. I’m not entirely confident in Dake’s chances in a Presidential election year. But who knows these days. Charles Dake won despite the odds once.

HD136 could be pretty competitive as well, as it’s next to two blue districts (Norr and Lampe), and it was 56/44 in 2006.

Southeast Missouri (HD104, 106-107, 110, 150, 152-163)

Open seats

HD156: Shelley Keeney (R) and Michael Winder (D) are running for the seat opened up by Rod Jetton.

HD158: Wayne Wallingford (R) and Jeff Glenn (R) are running to fill the seat that’ll be opened by the retirement of Mary Kasten (who was elected in February).

Uncontested seats

uncontested by the Reps: HD104, HD110, HD152, HD161, 162, 163

uncontested by the Dems: HD106, HD153, 154, 157, 158, and 160

Seats of interest

HD156: Jetton won by a 57/43 margin. The seat seems competitive enough due to the combo of general election closeness and primary election turnouts. (As opposed to some districts which vote overwhelmingly in the Democratic primary, and then vote Republican in November)

HD159: Billy Pat Wright might be pressed by Bill Burlison (probably not that Bill Burlison). Wright won 57/43 in 2006.

I’d put HD153 on the list if a strong challenger appears (Dethrow won narrowly in 2006). HD160 might be listable, although Brandom won by a pretty convincing margin for an open seat.

Northeast Missouri (HD1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 20-25, 99)

Open seats

HD20: Tom Scheppers (R), Jeanie Riddle (R), Don Salcedo (D), and David Moen (D) are running for the seat held by Danie Moore (who is termed out and running for Congress).

HD23: Cande Iveson (D) and Stephen Webber (D) are running for the seat currently held by Jeff Harris (who is running for Attorney General)

HD25: Sean Spence (D), Mary Wynne Still (D), Bob Pund (D), Ryan Asbridge (R) are running for the seat held by Judy Baker (who is running for Congress).

Uncontested seats

Uncontested by Republicans: HD6, HD8, HD9, HD23

Seats of interest

HD2: Right now, I think it’s reasonable to keep an eye out on this seat. I don’t know a lot about how a McClanahan/Thom Van Vleck matchup will go

HD20: The seat is friendly enough to the Democrats and with the seat being open, it should be pretty competitive.

HD21: Kelly Schultz is the only Dem so far who is challenging Steve Hobbs (who won 52/48 in 2006).

HD22: Therese Sander won 54/46 in 2006 and she is being challenged by Gail Brown.

HD24: Chris Kelly is challenging Ed Robb, who won 51-49 in 2006.

Overall

59 of 71 Democrats are unchallenged

45 of 92 Republicans are unchallenged

31 of 34 STL area Democrats (region 1, 2, 3) are unchallenged.

13 of 14 Jackson county Democrats are unchallenged

Outside of Southwest Missouri (region 7), only 29 of 70 Republicans are unchallenged.

My count had 17 Republicans unchallenged in 2006 (along with 38 Democrats). 5 of those 17 are challenged in 2008.

14 of 17 open Democratic seats are in the STL area or in Jackson County (while 8 of 18 Republican open seats are in the STL area, 3 in the suburbs and 5 in the county). It’s worth pointing out the large number of open Republican seats in that area with the possibility of Nixon and Page at the top of the ticket, with a majority going to the Democratic candidate from STL County.

Some candidates in waiting: Patrick Crabtree (R) has a committee in HD23. Russ Unger (D) also has a commitee in HD23.

So with 7 filing days left, there’s still ground to cover in the “filing” part. But as to the “Seats of Interest”..

23 Republican seats and 2 Democratic seats is my count. As to where i’m being too optimistic or pessimistic is anybody’s guess right now.

But we’re 11 pickups from a majority. And we could pull it off here.

Here are some summary maps

Statewide (Unopposed Reps in dark red, Reps in red, open Rep seats in orange, open Dem seats in skyblue, Dems in blue, unopposed Dems in dark blue. Yellow squares for the notable seats)

And an STL area map (same color code)

Maps adapted from here

So are there any extra notes or thoughts about possible competitive state house seats? Or notes about possible candidates who have yet to file?

UPDATE:

Here are some statewide result maps from 06) (Dem pickups get a skyblue square, Rep pickups get an orange square)

Ash-Trough

15 Saturday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Dick Gephardt, John Ashcroft

Congratulations to the Post-Dispatch for that title to its editorial on Ashcroft selling his reputation by accepting a no bid contract from his former underling at the Justice Department. His consulting firm has received “a no-bid gig that will pay out $27 million to $52 million over just 18 months” for monitoring a medical device company accused of making illegal kickbacks to doctors.

The sale of his soul reminds me of a minor tidbit from an old interview with Ashcroft that’s been sticking in my craw for several years now. In his last campaign, he came across all humble and homey by explaining how much he’s learned from his wife over the years. He offered the example of how she trained him to empty the dishwasher by putting the newly clean dishes on the bottom of the stack so that all the dishes got equal wear and tear. Isn’t that sweet? And so appropriate, the sort of thing his wife would be expected to know about. No Hillary Clinton in that household.

Pardon my cynicism–and I could be wrong–but I don’t even believe the example. I seriously doubt he did much emptying of the dishwasher, but if he really did, I hope he’ll accept my apology.  He and his wife are more careful housekeepers than I am. And I’ll just add that even after he earns multi-millions in the next year and a half, perhaps he’ll continue to live his humble, well ordered existence.

But even if he doesn’t spend any of those millions on waitstaff, I feel compelled to remind Mr. Ashcroft, considering how he has always worn his evangelicalism on his sleeve, of Christ’s admonition (Matt. 10:24):

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven.

Lest I seem too partisan in picking on Ash-trough, let me also congratulate the P-D on playing fair. The editorial remembered to take a well deserved shot at Dick Gephardt as well:

Somehow we thought Mr. Ashcroft would avoid the temptation to monetize his public service. We thought the same thing about former Rep. Richard A. Gephardt, D-St. Louis, another Mr. Clean while in office. We were disappointed there, too; Mr. Gephardt now is shilling for the investment banking and energy industries and the government of Turkey.

Shame on you, Dick Gephardt.

McCaskill is wealthy.

15 Saturday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill

I doubt if there’s any lesson to be drawn from this piece of information, but see what you think:

With a minimum net worth of $14.7 million in 2006, Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri ranks 11th in wealth among the nation’s 100 senators.

And Republican Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas isn’t far behind. He ranks 17th, with a minimum net worth of just over $10 million.

That’s according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which released its rankings of the wealthiest members of Congress today. McCaskill and Brownback were the only members from Missouri and Kansas to crack the top 25.

March 19th

15 Saturday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Five years.

It continues.

March 19, 2006. Mill Creek Park at the entrance to the Plaza, Kansas City.

It appears that some people aren’t paying much attention anymore.

March 20, 2003

[We] left Warrensburg at 4:30 p.m. and made it to the J.C. Nichols fountain at 47th and Main in Kansas City by 5:30 p.m. The organizers had planned for some time to have a 6:00 p.m. protest on the Plaza if hostilities broke out. I had been ambivalent about attending given the ugly rhetoric which is now being directed at those who dissent by the purveyors of right wing talk radio, cable television, and “yellow journalism”.  We had to do something positive and affirming rather than sit at home watching the crap on television which passes for real journalism these days, so we were finally resolved to attend.  As we drove up to the fountain we saw that people were already on the picket line and the TV trucks and cameras were in abundance.  At its peak we had 400 to 500 people.

It was overcast, cold and windy – temperature in the 40s.  We took our place on the line. We had decided earlier to only bring our pacifist signs. “Peace on Earth”, “In the Name of God, Stop Killing, In the Name of God”, and my graphic peace sign – it’s getting tattered from so much use…

Somewhat subdued, we quietly spoke on the line.  My favorite new sign: “War is so 20th century”. The response from passing traffic was overwhelmingly positive – a lot of honking and peace signs.  One well pickled Republican matron rolled down her car window and asked, “Don’t you people know the war has already started?”  This kind of cluelessness shouldn’t surprise me anymore.  There were occasional pro-war shouts and one “bird”, though I was surprised that they were not as ugly and aggressive as they were last Sunday – I suppose they’re sated because they are getting their crappy little war.

We stood next to a veteran (there were many there tonight).  We were joined by an old friend and several colleagues.  After a while the organizers called us to the fountain.  Some folk singers sang a witty and satirical “12 days of war” song.  We had brought candles (and plastic cups as wind shields), so we lit them and stood listening to the music.  The singers had us all join in singing “Peace, Shalom, Salaam”.  There were several speakers.  In the most peaceful moment of the day for me, as we stood there with our candles, we were barely aware that a photographer from the Kansas City Star took our pictures (when he finished he asked for our names and where we were from, writing the information down).  After the announcements were finished, the host marched through the Plaza shopping district.

The marchers stayed on the sidewalk, chanting in a call and response “Tell me what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like” and “What do we want? Peace! When do we want it? Now!”  As we marched into the Plaza we passed the glassed in front of one of those upscale dining establishments.  Lo and behold, two older women were standing watching us and flashed us peace signs!  We looped back around and passed several clothing establishments.  Some people shopping in the stores or watching us from the doorways flashed peace signs.

After we made it back to the fountain we walked to our car for the hour long drive home.

March 20, 2004

The war was “officially” started a year ago today.

We drove to Kansas City to attend the protest at 47th and Main in Mill Creek Park (near the J.C. Nichols fountain and the entrance to the Plaza). We had good weather and good attendance. I estimate the size of the crowd to be between 300 and 500.

We stood on the picket line on the north side of 47th Street with our signs. I alternated “Faux News Channel, fascist groupies”, “Stop Mad Cowboy Disease”, and “somewhere in Texas there’s a village missing an idiot” signs. I had the opportunity to flip over the “one finger for ignorance, two fingers for peace” sign for the benefit of a few individuals in some passing vehicles who were verbally deficient in expressing themselves.

One friend held a “Mourning in America, 577 killed, 3300 wounded” sign.

Someone passed out small American flags to everyone on the line.

The crowd was a decent mix, but I think most would be surprised by the number of middle aged and older individuals. There are always a number of veterans in attendance. I noted what appeared to be a handful of anarchists dressed in black, wearing black bandanas over their faces.

The Kansas City Police Department had five officers conducting surveillance from the parking garage at the southeast corner of the intersection. We all occasionally waved and photographed them photographing us.

One individual was on stilts and dressed as Uncle Sam, carrying a sign which stated, “I am ashamed.”

After all of this time I wonder if any of them is capable of coming up with something original. After the first few weeks and after almost a year and a half at over 200 vigils, marches, and protests I haven’t witnessed any of them being able to come up with anything new. Their cognitive dissonance is caught up in an infinite feedback loop.

We had an overwhelming number of supporting waves, honking horns, peace signs, thumbs up, and smiles. People were amused by the “Mad Cowboy” sign. We stand out there to let them know they are not alone. There are also the stone faced looks, the shaking heads, the occasional thumbs down, and of course, the single finger salute. Our favorite retort – “Look, they’re showing us their IQ!” got everyone on the line laughing.

One angry individual yelled, “Support our troops. Support our troops.” People on the line responded with shouts about inadequate supplies of body armor and a Guard unit having to improvise steel plates for unarmored vehicles. Someone else yelled, “Like when the administration cuts veterans benefits.”

Everyone on the line was aggressive in responding to challengers. It sometimes seems to shock them, as if they expected us to start crying or cower in the face of their bullying and brilliant, to them, verbal repartee.

A few passersby challenge us from their vehicles, but the traffic noise sometimes makes it hard to hear what they’re saying. We’ve taken to laughing at them, then cupping our hands over our ears and mouthing the words, “I can’t hear you.” It drives some of them to near apoplexy. One individual, driving east out of the Plaza, rolled down his windows and started yelling at us. I yelled, “What?” and then, as he drove past the picket line, everyone else loudly took up the question as his vehicle approached them. This continued for 50 yards. His head looked about ready to explode.

I turned to the nice older lady standing next to me and said, “We’re not going to take their crap anymore.” She laughed and nodded in agreement.

We were on the line from around 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. We saw a number of media still photographers, but I didn’t see any television cameras. The events were scheduled until 6:00 p.m., so they might have arrived later.

The Kansas City Star did its usual “thorough” reporting on peace events in the area.

We walked through the crowd and through the park, turned to look at the crowd and saw how large it was, and then walked to our car for the hour long drive home.

March 20, 2005

For the first time in nine months I came back to the same protest area in the park at 47th and Main in Kansas City. This place has become all too familiar. Two years ago today we stood on the north side of 47th street.

So, we find ourselves in the same place two years later. The picket line on the north side of 47th street stretched from Main to
Broadway, with the line curving around the corners of the north-south streets. It was bright and sunny, though a little on the cool side. With this kind of weather there’s a lot of traffic heading west into the Plaza shopping district.

Not much has changed in these two years, other than the increasing amount of carnage. That, and we have so much more experience at this now.

We started on the picket line a little bit before 4:00 p.m. We stayed on the line until about 5:30 p.m. The vast majority of passersby were supportive – with horn honking, peace signs and thumbs up. At first there was none of the overt hostility we had experienced in the past. Except for the stone faces.

This usually happens when they get trapped by the traffic light as they head west into the Plaza. They want us to avert our gaze – we don’t. There’s usually not much chatter coming from the picket line. We quietly converse and watch the passing traffic, sometime reacting with a peace sign in return for a honk or friendly wave. For those with stone faces, though, their hatred is palpable – this usually from someone driving a pristine upscale vehicle. We’re here and they don’t like it, but many seem to fear any reaction an overt display of hostility or shouting might provoke from the large picket line – that reminder of the great unwashed. Maybe they’re afraid we’ll try to squeegee their windshield and then ask for a handout.

Still, others stare at us. With no expression. It becomes a game. Who’ll avert their gaze before the light changes? We always win. If they look at us they have to read our signs. That would be too troubling.

At its peak we had over 100 people on the picket line with another 200 to 400 in the park listening to speakers or music. There was a podium and sound system where volunteers read the names of the dead. That sound washing over us in contest with the traffic noise and the honking horns. The American names are read with their rank. The Iraqi names have none.

The NBC and Fox affiliates had camera crews in attendance. The NBC crew crossed to the south side of 47th to film the picket line. I’m holding my “Faux News Channel, fascist groupies” sign.

Towards the end of our time on the line we encountered a few more derisive shouts and one poor soul who kept his middle finger extended for the entire line as he slowly trolled eastward out of the Plaza accompanied by a wave of mocking laughter from those of us on the pickets.  We win when they react. We win when they don’t react. We win by being here. And they all know it.  

One individual rolled down his car windows and yelled “Why don’t you enlist and go defend freedom?” Someone on the line called back, “You mean like dubya? He didn’t even show up.” The car continued down the line, with the driver leaning toward the passenger window yelling at other pickets. The retired priest (an old friend from my first protest on the Plaza) standing next to me shakes his head. He’s a veteran.

As we left the event, walking back to our vehicle I saw a teenager or twenty-something holding up a large sign next to the small main stage – “This Group Hates Our Country” – he was surrounded by a dozen anti-war activists who were talking to him. I didn’t bring any DD-4s  today. One would have come in handy.

March 19, 2006

Three years ago as the war started we attended a vigil in the park at 47th and Main in Kansas City. And marched on the Plaza. Two years ago I stood in the same place. One year ago I stood in the same place. Today I stood in the same place.

We left Warrensburg at 1:15 p.m. after picking up three students who wanted to attend the vigil. We arrived around 2:30 and parked in a garage at the west end of the Plaza, then walked to the park. As we approached we could see a sea of white sheets of paper floating on lines in the wind, some with photos, all with names, representing all of the casualties of this war, American and Iraqi. It took our breath away.

We took up places on the picket line. I started out holding my “…one nation, under surveillance” sign. I distributed all of my signs to others, including “I see their ‘justice’, I see their will of ‘god’, I see their ‘mercy’, it is a firing squad” to a young girl who was all too happy to hold it after an older woman rejected that one in favor of a Ghandi quote.

The media showed up – most of the Kansas City affiliates (NBC, ABC and Fox) sent out remote trucks and crews. As the ABC truck came by I held up my “Faux News Channel, fascist groupies” – the reporter and driver smiled, then laughed. A little while later the Fox remote truck headed west down the line on 47th street. People further up the line called out to me to pull up my sign. As luck would have it the Fox truck got stopped in traffic about ten feet from me. I held up my sign so that they could read it. Others on the picket line nearer to them waved their hands in front of the truck and pointed animatedly toward me and my sign. The reporter in the front seat smiled wanly, almost as if embarrassed as the picket line laughed at them. The driver was made of sterner stuff – he allowed no expression to cross his face.

The response was overwhelming. Most passing drivers honked horns and gave us a thumbs up or peace signs. The line was so crowded, at times we were three deep on 47th street, that I spent more time watching and listening to the crowd then I did observing the reactions of passersby. Early on one individual yelled at our students, one who was holding my “Stop Mad Cowboy Disease” sign, from a passing car – “You’re all a bunch of fucking idiots.” I walked up to their place on the line to congratulate them on their first troglodyte.

A choir of about a dozen individuals took a spot behind us and serenaded the picket line with satirical lyrics about Halliburton, war profiteering and George W. Bush. They were quite good.

The organizers planned to read the names of the dead and then hold a prayer service. I spent almost all of my time on the picket line, so I didn’t hear most of the speakers. The weather was overcast, windy and cold. I was thankful it didn’t rain. I estimate the crowd to be close to a thousand. It was hard to tell.

A reporter from the NBC affiliate interviewed a pre-teen child while the cameraman filmed her. The reporter turned to me while I was holding my “Faux News Channel, fascist groupies” sign – I told her, “Use it to bust your competition’s chops.” She smiled while the cameraman filmed me holding the sign.

Toward the end of our participation I walked around the park to take photos of the assembled crowd and the assembled television remote trucks.  At one point I walked up the hill to get a better view of the crowd.  My old friend, the retired Catholic priest from my first Plaza protest in November 2002, walked past me.  We recognized and greeted each other.  He had told me that he tried looking for me on the picket line, but couldn’t find me in the crowd.

At about 5:00 p.m. we left the vigil to eat dinner at an establishment on the Plaza. As we crossed Broadway, a lone dubya supporter with a “We support President Bush and our troops” sign was being interviewed by one of the television reporters. There were a few anti-war demonstrators around him. Any guesses about the “balanced” reporting which will take place on the late news?

….After dinner we walked back to our car for the long drive home. As we passed the park we saw that it was now empty.

We talked during the drive home. For our students who participated in this their first protest event the experience was an eye opener. They commented on the general lack of diversity in the crowd. For the most part those who attended were middle aged and older. Our students were amazed at the number of “older” people who approached to thank them for attending.

3,987 and 29,314 in 1,823 days (as of this posting).

Zen in the art of politics

15 Saturday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

A wise person wrote…

Spocko grokked an essential point in fullness that we should all take to heart.

Namely, when you fight a vicious and overwhelming enemy, you never fight them on their terms.

You never even approach their battlefield.

You consider what they require to oppose you. You think about what they can not defend. That’s where you hit them. Hard.

I wish there where more in the progressive blogsphere that would take this lesson to heart.

Don’t play the Enemy’s game. Ever.

…in response to this:

Hit ‘Em Where It Hurts

We are not worthy.

Matt "baby" Blunt's love for organized labor…

14 Friday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Missouri Governor Matt “baby” Blunt, well ensconced in his lame duck status, continues to demonstrate his lack of understanding of the actual contents of the Missouri Constitution:

Missouri Constitution

Article I

BILL OF RIGHTS

Section 29

Organized labor and collective bargaining.

Section 29. That employees shall have the right to organize and to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing.

[emphasis added]

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the product of decades of anti-labor jurisprudence in 2007:

Independence-National Education Association v. Independence School District, 223 S.W.3d 131 (Mo.banc)

…Section 29 is part of Missouri’s current Constitution, which was the product of a constitutional convention in 1943 and 1944 and was adopted by the voters in 1945. While the debates of the convention are interesting, they neither add to nor subtract from the plain meaning of the constitution’s words. Missouri’s voters did not vote on the words used in the deliberations of the constitutional convention. The voters voted on the words in the Constitution, which says “employees shall have the right to organize and to bargain collectively….”

“Employees” plainly means employees. There is no adjective; there are no words that limit “employees” to private sector employees. The meaning of section 29 is clear and there is, accordingly, no authority for this Court to read into the Constitution words that are not there….

…V. Conclusion

Article I, section 29’s guarantee that employees have “the right to bargain collectively” is clear and means what it says. Agreements that the school district made with employee groups are to be afforded the same legal respect as contracts made between the district and individuals, although public employees – unlike their private-sector counterparts – are not permitted to strike. As long as the duration and terms of such agreements comply with the limits provided by law for school districts to bind themselves, and are consistent with other statutes such as the teacher tenure act, the agreements are enforceable as any other contractual obligations undertaken by the district….

[emphasis added]

Uh, that means that the Missouri Constitution applies to public employees.

You’d think that the governor of the state would do his utmost to ensure that every citizen’s constitutional rights see the light of day. Think again:

EXECUTIVE ORDER 07-28

The Executive Order denoted 05-16 is hereby rescinded.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the Great Seal of the State of Missouri, in the City of Jefferson, on this 10th day of September, 2007.

ATTEST:

[Matt Blunt’s signature]

Matt Blunt

GOVERNOR

ATTEST:

[Robin Carnahan’s signature]

Robin Carnahan

Secretary of State

Why, that’s innocuous enough. Hmmm. Until one reads this.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 05-16

WHEREAS, the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, created by Section 286.010, RSMo, administers laws and programs relating to labor and employment; and

WHEREAS, the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri, created by Article IV, Section 49 of the Missouri Constitution and Section 286.010, RSMo, hears appeals from all final decisions and awards in workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, and victims of crime compensation cases at the highest administrative level, holds hearings and renders written decisions in prevailing wage disputes, and is composed of one public member, one employer representative and one employee representative; and

WHEREAS, the State Board of Mediation was created by Section 295.030, RSMo, and transferred to the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations by type II transfer under the Omnibus State Reorganization Act of 1974 and is composed of one public member who serves as chairman, two employer representatives and two employee representatives; and

WHEREAS, the primary duty of the State Board of Mediation is to determine the appropriate bargaining unit and conduct elections for public employees; and

WHEREAS, the consolidation of the State Board of Mediation’s functions into the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission will benefit the citizens of the State of Missouri by promoting efficiency and reducing costs without losing the representation of the public, employer and employee positions; and

WHEREAS, the Governor, in consultation with the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, has determined that the best way to accomplish this consolidation is to transfer the responsibilities, assets, functions and staff of the State Board of Mediation to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri with the Chairman of the Labor and Industrial Relation Commission assuming the duties of the Chairman of the State Board of Mediation.

NOW THEREFORE, I, Matt Blunt, Governor of the State of Missouri, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of Missouri, including Article IV, Section 12, Missouri Constitution, Chapter 26, RSMo, and the Omnibus State Reorganization Act of 1974, hereby transfer all the powers, duties and functions of the State Board of Mediation to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the Great Seal of the State of Missouri, in the City of Jefferson, on this 1st day of July, 2005.

[Matt Blunt’s signature]

Matt Blunt

GOVERNOR

ATTEST:

[Robin Carnahan’s signature]

Robin Carnahan

Secretary of State

Rescind duties? Why, who would do those rescinded duties?

Well, you see, the State Board of Mediation got its powers back – this is the board that is supposed to oversee the process of public employee collective bargaining agreements. Except the board has no members. Our lame duck governor hasn’t acted to appoint them. How convenient.

Word is that “there are at least ten petitions filed at the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awaiting action….Hundreds of public employees who have organized, signed petitions and requested that the Blunt administration follow the law and hold an election to allow them to choose a collective bargaining representative.”

Without that State Board of Mediation it ain’t gonna happen anytime soon. How convenient.

Abortion: Our Missouri legislators push the envelope.

14 Friday Mar 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion

Frankie and Johnny were sweethearts. Until Frankie got pregnant–by another man. Johnny told her that he wasn’t raising another man’s brat. He was big about it, though, and said that if she would get an abortion, all would be forgiven. Otherwise, she could move out, since the lease was in his name.

You might think Johnny was a fool to forgive Frankie, but some of our Missouri legislators take a dimmer view of his reaction. As far as they’re concerned, off to jail with him for advising, nay “coercing”, baby murder. He would have–under a bill now being considered in both houses of our legislature–committed a Class A misdemeanor or a Class C Felony, depending on the sentencing judge’s appraisal of the situation.

Admittedly, this scenario is an extreme example of how a proposed law might be applied, but even milder examples I could imagine would, like the example of Johnny, violate a man’s first amendment right to free speech. S.B. 1058 and H.B. 1831 create the the crime of “knowingly coercing a woman to seek or obtain an abortion.”  

The summary of the bills begins with offenses that are offenses, like abusing or stalking a woman for not getting an abortion. Fine. But then it moves right along to making a man a criminal if he files for divorce or even threatens to. Hold on. You’d think the bills’ sponsors were fresh off the boat from Russia, they’re so cavalier about ignoring the First Amendment. Jailing a man for coercing abortion because he threatened to get legal advice about obtaining a divorce, that’s out there. He hasn’t committed a crime. He’s just talked. Maybe he’s a jerk for talking that way, maybe not. But a criminal? The law can’t force a man to get married, and it can’t force him to stay that way. Pamela Sumners of Naral notes that:

Section 565.310.1 purports to throw a man in jail for being a cad, or even for being cuckolded, or perhaps because he simply does not want a child in his home even if a court later determined he had an obligation to pay for that child’s support. A woman has the right to choose not to be a mother within well-established parameters of law. A man cannot be thrown in jail or fined because he wants a divorce or change in domestic arrangements upon learning of an impending birth.

And the bill takes these absurd strictures further  by threatening doctors: a physician who performs an abortion knowing that the woman had any such pressures put on her can also go to jail. These bills would make it a Class C felony to perform an abortion after someone else talked trash.

The bills’ sponsors think they can tell people what they may not say and also what they must say. They specify that the doctor must tell each patient the risks of an abortion (enter junk science) and must describe “the physiological characteristics of an unborn child at two-week gestational increments.” Furthermore “the act requires the physician to discuss the medical assistance and counseling resources available, advise the woman of the father’s liability for child support, and provide information about the Alternatives to Abortion Program.”

All this must be done at least 24 hours in advance, thus requiring women who don’t live in St. Louis, Kansas City, or Columbia to be gone from home for two days instead of one. That’s an extra day away from work, perhaps. It’s a motel bill. Those minor inconveniences can be difficult hurdles for poor women.

Sumners calls the bills a “civil liberties minefield.” (If you’re interested, you can read her legal analysis of the bill.) So the chances of this holding up in court are slim to none. In fact, one legislator told lobbyist Mary Mosley that it’s a terrible bill, but he might as well vote for it because it will never get past a judge anyway. Some idealist, that guy.

Since the bills aren’t likely to pass constitutional muster, the aim is probably to keep NARAL and Planned Parenthood chasing their tails in court. So it’s important to keep such ludicrous bills from becoming law. Since the senate is taking up the bill first, why not call your senator? Here’s a list of senate phone numbers.

Taking a longer view of the problem, we need to take control at least of the House (eleven seats!) this fall so that such nonsense doesn’t make it to the floor for a vote.

 

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • No Kings – Warrensburg, Missouri – June 14, 2026
  • Ancient history repeats
  • Campaign Finance: promising us high regressive sales taxes
  • Close
  • Campaign Finance: way, way in

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,008 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...