Tags
He just stood in front of the VFW and did a backflip with a 180 and stuck the landing – and so far as I could tell, nobody noticed!
I actually think he freakin’ believes his own BS!
After rejecting parallels with Vietnam for the past four years, he is suddenly stripping to his skivvies and ready to climb into the sack with those very comparisons, albeit with a kinky twist.
Now it seems he thinks that we should have stayed in Vietnam – you remember Vietnam – that was the war that he, draft-dodging, war-mongering, chickenhawk that he is – refused to fight, the draft he dodged – you remember Vietnam. I certainly do, and so do my aunt and uncle who lost their oldest son….And Veterans of that conflict embarrassed me today by clapping for that SOB who so spectacularly failed the test back then.
“Three decades later, there is a legitimate debate about how we got into the Vietnam War and how we left,” Mr. Bush said. “Whatever your position in that debate, one unmistakable legacy of Vietnam is that the price of America’s withdrawal was paid by millions of innocent citizens whose agonies would add to our vocabulary new terms like ‘boat people,’ ‘re-education camps’ and ‘killing fields.”‘
And the idiots who voted for this clown called Kerry a flip-flopper. None of them should EVER call a Democrat a flip-flopper in my presence again. Not with this freakin’ political gymnast representin’ y’all.
Well – I am not the only one who was stunned speechless by the “say anything, what do I have to lose?” resident’s speech. Noted UCLA historian Robert Dallek, who has written extensively about the conflict in Iraq as compared to Vietnam, accused Bush of playing fast and loose with history.
“It just boggles my mind, the distortions I feel are perpetrated here by the president,” he said in a telephone interview.
“We were in Vietnam for 10 years. We dropped more bombs on Vietnam than we did in all of World War II in every theater. We lost 58,700 American lives, the second-greatest loss of lives in a foreign conflict. And we couldn’t work our will,” he said.
“What is Bush suggesting? That we didn’t fight hard enough, stay long enough? That’s nonsense. It’s a distortion,” he continued. “We’ve been in Iraq longer than we fought in World War II. It’s a disaster, and this is a political attempt to lay the blame for the disaster on his opponents. But the disaster is the consequence of going in, not getting out.”
So – will the mainstream media give him a[nother] pass, or will they finally call him on his delusional BS? What will you bet he gets a pass? But I think I have maybe figured out why…it is that he is just so wrong, wronger than anyone has ever been, so wrong that in the history of incompetence and failure he gets a special category…That there is just an air of “Holy sh**. Where do I even start???“
Well – enough already with the feeling overwhelmed. Pick a point and start making sense, and don’t stop.
Remember this: all they got is volume. Funny thing about volume, though…It’s pretty much non partisan.
In fact, I got that, too.
rears its ugly head again.
Innocent civilians will be killed if we leave, just like they were in Vietnam, where we got out too early???
If the United States leaves Iraq things will really get bad:
People on an Iraqi street, before they were made so happy by George W. Bush’s 2003 liberation. There isn’t a lot to say. Watch the video:[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC4EJ8Jlck0&w=425&h=350]Bush unveiled a new theory as to why we need to stay in Iraq.
To save face for Bush and buy him time to leave office office without having to change his mind.
‘The Surge Is Working!’ Isn’t Working
Bush knows it. Petraeus knows it. Crocker knows it. I know it. You know it. Pelosi and Reid and Levin and Lieberman and everyone except the in denial wingnuts knows it.
Pol Pot R Us