• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Deb Lavender

SB 41, HB 174, HB 236: abortion facts

24 Saturday Dec 2016

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

abortion, Deb Lavender, General Assembly, HB 174, HB 236, missouri, SB 41, Tila Hubrecht, Wayne Wallingford

Bills on “abortion alternative” entities. SB 41, pre-filed in the Senate on December 1st:

SB 41 – Under this act, the constitutions and laws of the United States and Missouri shall be interpreted, construed, applied, and enforced to fully protect the rights of an alternatives-to-abortion agency and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers to freely assemble and freely engage in religious practices and speech without government interference.

Nothing in this act shall preclude or preempt a political subdivision from exercising its lawful authority to regulate zoning or land use or to enforce a building or fire code regulation, provided that the political subdivision treats an alternatives-to-abortion agency in the same manner as a similarly situated agency.

A court may order injunctive relief with specified damages for violations of this act. Additionally, the Attorney General may bring a cause of action to defend the rights guaranteed under this act.

This act is similar to provisions in HB 99 (2015), HB 919 (2015), HB 1103 (2014), SCS/HCS/HB 1192 (2014), SB 658 (2014), HB 31 (2013), HB 717 (2013), SB 50 (2013), HB 1357 (2012), and SB 745 (2012).
[….]

HB 174, pre-filed in the House on December 8th:

HB 174 [pdf] — ALTERNATIVES-TO-ABORTION AGENCIES
SPONSOR: Hubrecht
This bill requires the constitutions and laws of the United States and Missouri to be interpreted, construed, applied, and enforced to fully protect the rights of an alternatives-to-abortion agency and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers to freely assemble and freely engage in religious practices and speech without government interference. Nothing in the bill must preclude or preempt a political subdivision from exercising its lawful authority to regulate zoning or land use or to enforce a building or fire code regulation, provided that the political subdivision treats an alternatives-to abortion agency in the same manner as a similarly situated agency. The bill permits a court to order injunctive relief with specified damages for violations of the provisions of the bill and permits the Attorney General to bring a cause of action to defend the rights guaranteed under the provisions of bill. This bill is the same as SB 41 (2017).

[emphasis added]

Facts? Who needs facts?

Deb Lavender (D) [2016 file photo].

Deb Lavender (D) [2016 file photo].

Facts. HB 236, pre-filed in the House on December 15th:

FIRST REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 236 [pdf]
99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE LAVENDER.
0877H.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 188, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to reproductive health care services.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 188, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 188.345, to read as follows: 188.345.
1. For purposes of this section, the term “medically accurate and unbiased information” shall mean information that is:
(1) Verified or supported by the weight of medical research conducted in compliance with accepted scientific methods;
(2) Recognized as correct and objective by leading medical organizations with relevant expertise or government agencies, such as the:
(a) American Medical Association;
(b) American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;
(c) American Public Health Association;
(d) American Academy of Pediatrics;
(e) American College of Physicians;
(f) American Academy of Family Physicians;
(g) Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
(h) Food and Drug Administration;
(i) National Cancer Institute;
(j) American Psychological Association; or
(k) National Institute for Health; or
(3) Recommended by or affirmed in the medical practice guidelines of a nationally recognized accrediting organization, such as the:
(a) Joint Commission;
(b) National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA);
(c) American Accreditation HealthCare Commission or Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (AAHC/URAC); or
(d) Accreditation Association for Ambulatory HealthCare (AAAHC).
2. For purposes of this section, the term “pregnancy-related services” shall mean services including, but not limited to, family planning, abortion care, prenatal care, labor and delivery, and postpartum care.
3. To be eligible to receive state funding, all organizations that provide pregnancy related services or counseling shall provide medically accurate and unbiased information on all relevant reproductive health options including, but not limited to, information about birth control, pregnancy, adoption, labor and delivery, and postpartum care.

[emphasis in original]

Gee, we should expect that pregnancy related organizations that provide pregnancy related services should provide medically accurate and unbiased information all the time, right?

SB 41 [pdf] and HB 174 serve another agenda:

[….]
188.125. 1. It is the intent of the general assembly to acknowledge the rights of an alternatives-to-abortion agency and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers to freely assemble and to freely engage in religious practices and speech without governmental interference, and that the constitutions and laws of the United States and the state of Missouri shall be interpreted, construed, applied, and enforced to fully protect such rights.
2. A political subdivision of this state is preempted from enacting, adopting, maintaining, or enforcing any order, ordinance, rule, regulation, policy, or other similar measure that prohibits, restricts, limits, controls, directs, inteferes with, or otherwise adversely affects an alternatives-to-abortion agency or its officers, agents, employees, or volunteers’ assembly, religious practices, or speech, including but not limited to counseling, referrals, or education of, advertising or information to, other communications with, clients, patients, other persons, or the public.
[….]

Gee, nothing in SB 41 and HB 174 about providing medically accurate and unbiased information. Go figure.

Missouri House – May 12, 2016

12 Thursday May 2016

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Caleb Rowden, Dean Dohrman, Deb Lavender, House, Kimberly gardner, Mike Colona, missouri, Stacey Newman, Stephen Webber, Tracy McCreery

Today was the next to last day of the legislative session. At this point it’s non-stop bills, amendments, and conference committee reports. Tomorrow will be more of the same.

Representative Stacey Newman (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Stacey Newman (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Dean Dohrman (r) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Dean Dohrman (r) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Stephen Webber (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Stephen Webber (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Mike Colona (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Mike Colona (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Tracy McCreery (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Tracy McCreery (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Deb Lavender (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Deb Lavender (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Kimberly Gardner (D) - May 12, 2016.

Representative Kimberly Gardner (D) – May 12, 2016.

Representative Caleb Rowden (r) - May 12, 2016

Representative Caleb Rowden (r) – May 12, 2016

Previously:

HA 4 to HCS SS SCS SB 663: open season (May 12, 2016)

94th Legislative District: April 2010 campaign finance reports

03 Thursday Jun 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

94th Legislative District, campaign finance, Deb Lavender, missouri, Rick Stream

Previously:

Rick Stream: too far right for Kirkwood (June 2, 2010)

Deb Lavender is thinking about running again (November 19, 2008)

Making the rounds with Deb Lavender: Part Two (July 15, 2008)

Making the rounds with Deb Lavender (July 14, 2008)

The 2010 race in the 94th Legislative District is definitely going to be one to watch.

State Representative – District 94

Democrat

DEB LAVENDER ST LOUIS MO 958 2/23/2010

Republican

RICK STREAM ST LOUIS MO 903 2/23/2010

Yes, a rematch. From 2008:

Official Election Returns

State of Missouri General Election  – 2008 General Election

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

State Representative – District 94 – Summary

Precincts Reporting 24 of 24

Stream, Rick REP 11,623 54.2%

Lavender, Deb DEM 9,828 45.8

Total Votes   21,451

The Democratic Party candidate, Deb Lavender, filed her first quarter campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on April 14th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: LAVENDER FOR STATE REP

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $20,618.21

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $8,945.20

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $29,563.41

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $2,638.16

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $24,858.04

[emphasis added]

An excellent fundraising quarter and a low burn rate. Let’s take a look at where the contributions came from:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: LAVENDER FOR STATE REP

Report Date: 4/14/2010

Jane Bogetto – PRIMARY Kirkwood MO Retired 03/25/2010 $100.00

Des Peres Physical Therapy – PRIMARY Dese Peres mo 03/28/2010 $1,000.00

13. TOTAL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM PERSONS GIVING $100 OR LESS $2,749.20

[emphasis added]

That Jane Bogetto. And lot of small dollar contributions, many from retired individuals.

The expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: LAVENDER FOR STATE REP

ReportDate: 4/14/2010

A. EXPENDITURES OF $100 OR LESS BY CATEGORY

ActBlue Tech Services $3.95

ActBlue Tech Services $1.98

ActBlue Tech Services $5.93

ActBlue Tech Services $0.99

ActBlue Tech Services $1.98

ActBlue Tech Services $0.99

ActBlue Tech Services $3.17

ActBlue Tech Services $11.86

ActBlue Tech Services $5.93

ActBlue Tech Services $9.92

ActBlue Tech Services $2.97

ActBlue Tech Services $2.97

ActBlue Tech Services $0.99

ActBlue Tech Services $1.98

ActBlue Tech Services $0.99

ActBlue Tech Services $4.95

ActBlue Tech Services $11.27

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

City of Kirkwood Kirkwood, Mo 02/25/2010 Rental Down Payment $250.00

Fundraising!

The republican incumbent, Rick Stream, filed his first quarter campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on April 15th:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: FRIENDS OF RICK STREAM

ReportDate:

1. TOTAL RECEIPTS FOR THIS ELECTION PREVIOUSLY REPORTED $49,426.42

2. ALL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED THIS PERIOD $3,000.00

9. TOTAL ALL RECEIPTS THIS ELECTION(SUM 1B + 7A – 8A) $52,426.42

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $20,850.11

28. MONEY ON HAND AT THE CLOSE OF THIS REPORTING PERIOD (SUM 25 + 26 – 27) $38,596.62

[emphasis added]

That’s some serious spending. And where did the money come from this quarter?:

Detailed Summary of Contributions And Loans Received

Committee: FRIENDS OF RICK STREAM

Report Date: 4/15/2010

MO Podiatry PAC Jefferson City, MO 03/05/2010 $500.00

Patrick Busch St. Louis, MO 01/16/2010 $1,000.00

Comprehensive Health Systems Hannibal, MO 01/23/2010 $500.00

Steve Haag Kirkwood, MO 03/05/2010 $500.00

Union Pacific Railroad Co. 03/12/2010 $400.00

13. TOTAL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM PERSONS GIVING $100 OR LESS $100.00

That’s all of it for this quarter. It doesn’t quite have that grassrootsie feel, does it?

Let’s look at the expenditures:

Detailed Summary of Expenditures And Contributions Made

Committe: FRIENDS OF RICK STREAM

ReportDate: 4/15/2010

B. ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES ALL OVER $100 AND ALL PAYMENTS TO CAMPAIGN WORKERS

Missouri Republican Party Jefferson City, MO 02/17/2010 Lincoln/Reagan Days $345.00

C. MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS MADE (REGARDLESS OF AMOUNT)

St. Louis Victory PAC 01/28/2010 $400.00

Lincoln/Reagan Days? I think I’ll pass.

What did he report spending in 2008 (8 Day Before General Election report)?:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: FRIENDS OF RICK STREAM

ReportDate: 12/4/2008

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $109,976.67

And Deb Lavender’s 2008 numbers (8 Day Before General Election report)?:

Detailed Summary of Committee Disclosure Report

Committe: DEB LAVENDER FOR STATE REP

ReportDate: 12/4/2008

15. TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS ELECTION (SUM 10B + 14A) $82,036.04

Not bad at all.

Yep, this one just might turn in 2010.

Deb Lavender is thinking about running again

20 Thursday Nov 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Deb Lavender, missouri

After his unsuccessful run against Todd Akin in the Second Congressional, Bill Haas announced at the last meeting of West County Dems that he and some other concerned citizens had met and talked about the need for campaigning for 2010 races to start next spring.

It couldn’t hurt.

Deb Lavender wasn’t part of that conversation, but I got an e-mail from her this week saying that she is looking into having another go at Rick Stream in HD 94 in Kirkwood.

Deb got almost 46 percent of the vote there on November 4th, so taking another run at him seems reasonable. It’s true that with one short exception, that seat has been in Republican hands for fifty years, but the exception was that Jane Bogetto captured that seat in a 2005 special election–only to lose it in 2006, as the victim of (if you can believe such a thing) Republican smears.

So it’s possible to do it. Jim Trout came achingly close to winning Gibbons’ senate seat, which covers Kirkwood and Webster. Next door in Webster Groves, Jeanne Kirkton got 51.4 percent of the vote.

It’s true that Kirkton had some advantages Deb didn’t. For one, Jeanne had run for the state senate against Gibbons in ’04 and had that name recognition going for her. Also contributing to her name recognition was that Jeanne’s been on the Webster City Council. Bogetto had a similar advantage from having served on the Kirkwood School Board. The final advantage Jeanne had, which Deb didn’t this year and won’t have if she runs in two years, is that the Webster rep was termed out. Deb will have to face an incumbent.

On the plus side for Deb is that she ran an impressive race for someone who has never tried it before. She can look back at the past year and a half of effort, take pride in it, maybe wince at a few mistakes and learn from them.

I say it’s worth another try–and kudos to Deb for picking herself back up so quickly. If she decides to do it–are you listening, Bill?–she can start next spring.

photo of Deb with state party chairman John Temporiti, courtesy of Deb’s website

Making the rounds with Deb Lavender: Part Two

15 Tuesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Deb Lavender, missouri

Get to the point!

On the evening that I went out door knocking with Deb Lavender, she did that. She introduced herself and told each person that, as a physical therapist who owns a business in Kirkwood, she is passionate about health care. She is also passionate about having members of both parties sit down at the table together and work on solutions without all the bickering.

One man asked her what she could do as a state rep to ease the health care crisis in Missouri. Her answer was a solution I’d not heard of. She told him that she wanted Missourians to have the right to knock on Medicare’s door and ask for a premium. She  told him that Medicare’s rates are far lower than Anthem’s, the company where he gets his insurance, because Medicare operates with 5 percent overhead, whereas Anthem and other private insurers operate with 40 percent overhead. Anthem’s rates would fall if people had the option of going with Medicare.  

Deb wasn’t sure that such a plan could be enacted, but even if that didn’t work out, she’d at least aim to get vets on Medicare if they want that coverage.

None of the people we talked to that evening questioned her about her second passion, establishing bipartisan cooperation. But I did. As we drove back to the office, I played devil’s advocate and pointed out that bipartisan cooperation isn’t feasible when Republicans are so bent on having it: my way or the highway. Their motives are mainly greedy, I said, and finding consensus between legislators who want a level playing field for ordinary people and those who want to enrich the wealthy doesn’t work.

Deb didn’t dispute that. In fact, she added that they’ve punished Democrats for the sin of being Democrats by taking the parking assignments of Dem leaders and giving them to junior Republican legislators. Same with office space. Deb told me that one Democratic legislator spent an entire summer attending workshops to learn more about the topic of a subcommittee she was to sit on. Then the Republicans, for no good reason, removed her from that subcommittee.

So it isn’t as if Deb is naive about Republicans. But she does believe that when Democrats retake the power, they will be tempted to exact some payback for all that gratuitous meanness. Bad idea. And Deb would push for as much comity as possible.

So, let’s see, the mostly socially moderate voters of Kirkwood have a choice between pro-voucher, pro-death penalty, pro-abstinence-only sex ed, anti-choice, anti-cure Republican Rick Stream or a concerned, compassionate, sensible Democrat in the person of Deb Lavender. That should be a no-brainer. All she has to do is knock on 12,000 doors before November 4th and show them the difference. That’s all.

That would require hitting 500 doors a week, and–hint, hint–she could sure use more help achieving that.

Making the rounds with Deb Lavender

14 Monday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Deb Lavender, missouri, Rick Stream

Last Tuesday evening, I tagged along as Dev Lavender, running for state rep in Kirkwood, H.D. 94, knocked on doors. We started at 5:00 on a hot, muggy evening–but with a breeze, thank goodness. As we drove to the spot where we met two other volunteers, Deb explained her concerns about finding spots on main thoroughfares for her yard signs. And she talked about the challenge of being a first time candidate and not knowing things that would be obvious to old pros. For example, she thought ordering yard signs a week and a half in advance would be plenty. No-o-o. She should have ordered them at least three weeks before she needed them.

We set off with the VAN list, skipping the houses that had been identified as strong Republicans. Most people didn’t greet us like company they’d been expecting, but more like we might turn out to be Jehovah’s Witnesses–and we were guilty until proven innocent of that charge. Most of them eased up a little once they realized we weren’t proselytizing (well, not proselytizing for Jesus anyway), but we still weren’t the company they’d been expecting.

Their coolness is so understandable, and it’s no predictor of what will happen in the conversation. One man stood on the sidewalk, holding his cig till it died but not inhaling–considerate of him, I thought. He was a yellow dog Democrat and liked to talk about his experiences. He talked for ten minutes or so, then he told us to be sure to visit with Julia, two doors up. “Now she might not answer, cause she’s blind, and if Bill ain’t home, she might not feel comfortable. But he usually gets home around this time. He’s still workin’ at 72. Me, I got outta Chrysler when I couldn’t take them bosses no more.”

Two doors up, Bill answered, came outside, listened to Deb’s pitch without much expression one way or another. Then Deb mentioned that his neighbor had told us about his wife’s vision problems and asked if she was home. Bill invited us in. We weren’t expecting that.

I made over their two Maine Coon cats–what beauties!–while Deb and Julia got acquainted. Turns out that Julia was the first woman in Kirkwood to run for the City Council. This was back in the seventies. She lost that race, but Marge Schramm, who ran for mayor in the eighties and won, said that Julia had broken ground for female candidates in Kirkwood. Before Julia retired, she ran non-profits, and in fact at one time headed an organization with 6,000 volunteers to oversee.

Deb invited her to help with her campaign, but Julia said, “I can’t see anything.” Deb’s response was that her experience would be very valuable, and I chimed in that Julia would have told her to order those yard signs earlier than she had.

Julia wasn’t interested in working on the campaign, though. On the other hand, she did offer to put up a yard sign for Deb. Julia and Bill are on Geyer Road, a major thoroughfare in Kirkwood–AND right across from a polling place. A plum location.

That, as it turned out, was the house of the night. We soldiered on.

One young mother opened her apartment door with a sweet smile. Deb gave her the opening patter: “Hi, I’m Deb Lavender, and I’m running for state rep. I’m getting out and meeting the neighbors. Do you vote Democratic, Republican … or it depends?” The young woman’s smile broadened: “I work for the Republican Party.” Anyone who’s ever used a VAN list knows they’re not perfect. Deb returned her smile and said that the lady probably wouldn’t be voting for her, then. She shrugged. “They pay my bills, and I don’t bite the hand that feeds me.”

Another man listened to Deb’s intro, took the literature, told her that he was a Democrat and that he’d vote for her. And stopped short of saying, “Now that’s all I want to hear. You can go away.” But we got the idea and left him to his life.

Deb is running against an incumbent, Rick Stream , who is more conservative than most Kirkwood voters. He is pro-voucher in a school district that places high value on its schools, anti-stem cell research, anti-choice, pro-death penalty, and pro-abstinence only sex education.

Deb mentioned none of that at the doors, however, unless someone asked, preferring to focus on her passion, as a physical therapist and a small business owner, for health care reform. I’ll have more to say tomorrow about her conversations with constituents about health care, as well as about her belief that legislators should quit bickering and start looking for common ground.

Blograiser Followup

22 Thursday May 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Blograiser, Deb Lavender, missouri, Saint Louis

So we had our very first blograiser last night. It was much like our original idea, which was a blogger meetup (like last fall) + candidate + contributions to said candidate. 15 people showed up, not counting myself, Deb, and hotflash. Deb Lavender got checks totalling $190 at the event, plus whatever was donated on ActBlue (which is still an option, whether you’ve contributed already or not.) A couple of people promised more contributions at the event, so we’ll update with a total if they follow through. As an added bonus, Deb got to hand off cards and donor envelopes to a few Kirkwood residents who happened to be playing washers near us.

It was good to see Archpundit, Maryb2004, hotflash, duckhunter, ashriver and Rea Kleeman from this blog, and American Phoenix from Daily Kos. It was also nice to meet some of you lurkers. And Joan Landmann stopped by later on to chat, which was highly entertaining. We talked politics, sports, movies, and God knows what else till 11:00 over beers, burgers, pita bread and hummus. (I highly recommend the hummus next time you’re at the Royale – yum!)

We’ll be doing this again in the next few months, but we always hope to make things bigger and better. Suggestions are welcome. If you’re interested in doing a blograiser in another part of the state, I’ll be happy to do whatever I can to help out.

Blograiser Tonight!

21 Wednesday May 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Blograiser, Deb Lavender, missouri, Saint Louis

Just a reminder – our blograiser for Deb Lavender is tonight! Please join us in helping a great candidate take back another seat in the Missouri House. Every person who contributes tonight means less time for her on the phones to donors and more time knocking doors and attending town hall meetings.

Date: Wednesday, May 21st

Place: The Royale at 3132 S. Kingshighway in St. Louis

Time: 7:00pm until ???

We’ll be at the Royale from 7pm to whenever, and some goodies will be provided. If you know someone who can’t make it in person, please ask them to consider a $10.01 contribution at Deb’s ActBlue page: http://www.actblue.com/page/de…

Reminder: St. Louis Area Blograiser Next Wednesday

15 Thursday May 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Deb Lavender, missouri

Reminder – we’ll be meeting at The Royale next Wednesday to support Deb Lavender.

Date: Wednesday, May 21st

Place: The Royale at 3132 S. Kingshighway in St. Louis

Time: 7:00pm until ???

If you’re on Facebook, you can RSVP here.

In the announcement diary, I described Deb pretty generically – a Democrat who cares about education and health care and the environment running against an awful Republican. All of which is true, but there’s more to it. Deb is not a career politician. She’s a concerned citizen, just like the rest of us, who decided to put herself on the line and make a run for office. What’s more, Deb’s surprisingly good at the nitty-gritty of the campaign; she’s persistent, shows up at every Democratic event in the area, knocks doors all over her district, and works extremely hard at raising money. When a qualified candidate puts forth the effort like that, she needs like-minded folks like us to step forward and help her out.

We look forward to seeing you on Wednesday night. Please bring a suggested contribution of at least $10. Questions and suggestions welcome in comments.

Save the Date: St. Louis Blograiser May 21st!

08 Thursday May 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Blograiser, Deb Lavender, missouri, St. Louis

I know you’re probably looking for someplace to put your activist energy as a long presidential primary winds down, and better yet, get behind one Democrat fighting an extremist Republican.

If you’re in the St. Louis area, you’re in luck. We are pleased to announce the first official blograiser in Missouri, on behalf of Deb Lavender, Democratic candidate for the 94th District of the Missouri House. Deb is a fantastic candidate running against an awful opponent, so picking her ahead of so many other good local candidates wasn’t as hard a choice as we thought it might be. Deb is a Kirkwood physical therapist and small business owner who is running for health care and education reform and to protect our environment. She’s also dogged campaigner who’s not afraid to make a speech in a crowded bar, put in call time, and knock door after door in her district. Her opponent, Rick Stream, is a far-right Republican who voted for such measures as abstinence-only education in schools and to hurt MOHELA’s ability to provide low-interest loans to college students. Best of all, he’s beatable. Deb whipped him in fundraising last quarter and is nearly even in cash on hand. And recently as 2006, Democrats held the seat. It’s going to take some effort, but it’s within reach.

So, here’s how a blograiser works. It’s essentially a combination meetup, fundraiser, and liveblog. We will meet at the Royale at 7:00pm on May 21st, just like about 30 of us did last fall. This time, we’ll pitch in some cash on behalf of Deb, and some of us will give online updates on our respective blogs. You can either bring your checkbook to the Royale, or you can contribute online at Deb’s ActBlue page. The suggested minimum contribution is $10, and if you contribute online ahead of time, please print out your confirmation page and bring it to the blograiser.

Date: Wednesday, May 21st

Place: The Royale at 3132 S. Kingshighway in St. Louis

Time: 7:00pm until ???

And in case you’re on Facebook, here’s the Facebook event page.

Remember, the action in Jefferson City is arguably a lot more important to us in Missouri than what goes on in Washington, D.C. Winning this seat back for the Democrats is a necessary step to bringing responsible governance back to the statehouse. So let’s support Deb!

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • The answer is blowing in the wind…
  • TACO! [blink]
  • Is someone going to tell him?
  • Gerrymander this, Denny
  • Fascist pig

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on Profit!
The price we all pay… on “Up, Up and Away……
HB 2075: Who checks?… on Hey Brandon Phelps (r), we hea…
Campaign Finance: a… on Campaign Finance: Working Peop…
The mail pieces have… on Are you certain it wasn’…

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,035,308 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...