• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: HB 1

HB 1: Gerrymander this

09 Tuesday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Extraordinary Session, Fascist pigs, General Assembly, gerrymandering, HB 1, missouri, Redistricting, sycophants, Trump sycophants

“Gerrymander This”

The right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly is proceeding with the gerrymandered early redistricting of Missouri’s congressional districts at the behest of Donald Trump (r). Fascists gotta Fascist:

103rd General Assembly, 2nd Extraordinary Session
HB 1 Creates provisions for redistricting federal congressional seats
Sponsor: Deaton, Dirk (159)
Proposed Effective Date: Varies
LR Number: 3344H.01P
Last Action: 09/08/2025 – Perfected (H)
Bill String: HB 1
[….]

Some of the submitted testimony to the Special Committee on Redistricting:

I oppose this power grab in an already gerrymandered state. Missouri overwhelmingly opposes the state passing harmful legislation and overturning voter approved bills. Embarrassing. History will not look kindly.

Gerrymandering is intentionally taking away the voice of the people. If we are a democracy, the voice of the people should be heard. Just as with our last election, our legislature has proven they do not care about their constituents or our votes. They only want power and control. Stop this nonsense, and start passing reforms to help everyday citizens.

I oppose this attempt to further marginalize the voices of non-Republicans in the state of Missouri. There is no moral or democratic reason for this mid decade redistricting. It is apparent that the Republican lawmakers are willing to silence the voices of Missouri citizens to follow the orders handed to them by a corrupt federal government.

This is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL call for gerrymandering. It is a blatant attempt to take away representation for Democratic voters. Democratic voters account for 40% of the vote in the state and already only have 25% representation. This will further dilute that representation to only 12%. This is anti-democratic!

There is no reason to redraw congressional districts; gerrymandering is unconstitutional and serves only to suppress the vote. There is no other legitimate and valid purpose. There is no compelling government interest that justifies this action. This is an arbitrary action that interferes with the fundamental rights of all citizens, regardless of political party.

Can we not bootlick a person in the Epstein files please? This is a distraction from the very real fact our sitting president was close friends with a pedophile…a pedophile and a rapist. And you scurry to do his bidding. Gross and embarrassing.

Members of the Committee,

I submit this testimony in opposition to the Governor’s proposed redistricting map. Article III, Section 3 of the Missouri Constitution establishes both the standards and the timing for redistricting.

First, Missouri’s Constitution makes clear that redistricting occurs only once every ten years following the U.S. Census, or if a court strikes down an existing plan. We are currently in the middle of the 2020 Census cycle, and no court has invalidated our maps. Attempting to redraw districts now has no constitutional basis and would directly conflict with the provisions of Article III.

Second, the Constitution requires that districts achieve partisan fairness and competitiveness. A map designed to guarantee a 7–1 congressional split grossly misrepresents Missouri’s statewide vote patterns, where Republicans typically receive about 57% of the vote and Democrats about 41%. Such an outcome would almost certainly exceed the 15% wasted-vote threshold and fail the responsiveness simulations required by our Constitution.

Finally, the Constitution requires that redistricting be carried out by the independent bipartisan citizens commission (or the judiciary if the commission fails), not by the General Assembly in special session. For these reasons, the mid-cycle timing, the fairness violations, and the improper process, I respectfully urge you to reject the Governor’s proposed map.

Thank you for your consideration.

I find it truly appalling and disheartening that the state I have called home for over 40 years is seeking to essentially negate the voices and will of 40% of its tax-paying citizens. It’s truly a travesty. No taxation without representation. I sincerely object as an American.

Supporting the out of schedule redrawing of congressional districts is a violation of the people of Missouri’s rights. This clearly an undemocratic attempt to prop the next election in favor of one party.

I stand in strong opposition to the redistricting plan proposed by Governor Kehoe and the Missouri Republicans. This legislation would leave Kansas City without meaningful representation, a clear violation of both the Missouri Constitution and the United States Constitution. The GOP received 58% of the statewide vote, yet they are attempting to take 7 of 8 congressional seats—87.5% of the representation. That is not democracy, it is gerrymandering. This plan will not survive constitutional scrutiny, and the inevitable litigation will waste millions of taxpayer dollars. Kansas Citians deserve representation, not disenfranchisement.

HB1 is a blatant attempt to redraw Missouri’s congressional map with no transparency, no public input, and no regard for the people it impacts. Maps should reflect real communities—not political calculations—but this proposal is nothing more than partisan and racial gerrymandering that silences voters in the 5th Congressional District and beyond. Redrawing maps mid-cycle is political gamesmanship that erodes trust in our democracy. Every person deserves to be heard, counted, and fairly represented—and HB1 denies Missourians that fundamental right by letting politicians choose their voters instead of voters choosing their representatives.

Redrawing Missouri’s district maps to heavily favor Republican voters, instead of representing a fair mix of how the Missouri populace actually votes is undemocratic and an insult to all voters of this great state. Coupled with the fact that Missouri’s current leadership does not want to abide by voter-passed initiatives, this new map is entirely self-serving and designed to make a stronghold where the people will never get a say again. The voters should choose its representatives, NOT the other way around.

This gerrymandering effort must not be allowed to move forward. Furthermore, if this map passes without a quorum, it is illegal and should be stricken.

I urge the committee to reject HB 1, the so-called “Missouri First Map,” an illegal and anti-democratic proposal designed to silence voters by rigging Congressional district maps solely for political leverage in advance of the 2026 elections.

The proposal would break up Kansas City and combine metro Kansas City with farmers over 250 miles away on the Illinois/Iowa border – making it harder for all of these communities to be fairly represented. Seven out of eight congressional districts would go to Republicans, even though Democrats make up about 40% of Missouri’s voters.

The Missouri Constitution says that Congressional redistricting only occurs every 10 years after the census. This accounts for population shifts to ensure that everyone’s vote counts. Missouri already did so after the most recent census — and rejected a 7-1 map like the proposal in front of you today. Redrawing lines mid-decade to split up voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice violates our constitution.

Let’s be clear – this is about politicians choosing their voters, not voters choosing their representatives. And that’s just anti-democratic. This proposal is nothing more than an attempt to rig the 2026 elections before a single vote is even cast – at the behest of Washington DC, and at the expense of real Missourians.

Missourians across the political spectrum oppose this mid-decade redistricting. This proposal would silence hundreds of thousands of Missourians – pitting people against one another and breaking up communities instead of creating a system that works for everyone. Missouri lawmakers: Please stand up for your constituents and reject this effort to rig the district lines and split up our local communities.

Missouri is the show-me state. Please show your constituents and all Missourians that you care about their ability to make their voices heard fairly and reject this proposal.

As a voter, it is my constitutional right to be able to vote in my district without corrupt politicians and special interference groups interfering with my rights. Any and all involved in this scheme is openly anti-democracy and should be ashamed.

I urge the committee to reject HB 1, the so-called “Missouri First Map,” an illegal and anti-democratic proposal designed to silence voters by rigging Congressional district maps solely for political leverage in advance of the 2026 elections.

Missouri has had a Kansas City-based Congressional District since at least 1885, when a former Kansas City Mayor was elected to the post. Now Donald J. Trump, Governor Mike Kehoe and the GOP supermajority in Jefferson City want to break us up, destroying our traditional 5th Congressional
District and splitting Kansas City into 3 districts. We have been ably represented by Emanuel Cleaver II, another former Kansas City Mayor, since 2005. We cannot allow our community to be divided in an unprecedented mid-decade partisan gerrymander.

The plan developed is, of course, unconstitutional. “Districts shall be contiguous and as compact as may be.” This is not true of the GOP map, which spreads a portion of Kansas City into far west and southwest Missouri, comprising vast swaths of of rural areas, while the other district stretches beyond central Missouri into areas north and east of Columbia.

Communities shall be preserved. In this plan, they are not. One of Kansas City’s smallest and most diverse State House Districts would be in three Congressional Districts, not coincidentally dividing Kansas City’s sizable Latino Community.

Districts should follow political subdivision lines and split counties and county segments shall be as few as possible. In this plan, Jackson County is intentionally divided into three Districts, diluting the interests of our community in all three.

My home would be in the new 4th District, while 2 miles away, my neighbors east of Troost Avenue would be in the 5th, which includes Jefferson City and parts northeast of Columbia. The decision to utilize Troost Avenue is not coincidental- the GOP has intentionally utilized the disgraced ‘dividing line’ between Black and white Kansas City, enforced during the decades of de jure and de facto segregation.

This is a most cutting and offensive affront, especially to generations of civil rights leaders who have sought to tear down this Troost Avenue barrier.

Of course, using divisive boundaries like Troost Avenue immorally divides the City’s sizeable Black community, perpetuating segregation and the marginalization of minority and progressive communities.

This decision is wrong, morally bankrupt and, given the majority’s fealty to the whims of the President, likely to be rubber stamped by the General Assembly.

Kansas Citians will see you in court, and likely at the Ballot Box, to stop this illegal and unconstitutional GOP power grab!

The proposed redistricting plan will do nothing to further fair, free elections in the state of Missouri and will simply serve to hurt all Missourians by disenfranchising those in areas that have historically elected Democrats and also by reducing the incentives for Republicans in ‘safe’ districts to listen to their constituents as their districts are seen as even less competitive than they already are.

This power grab is unconstitutional, undemocratic, and unacceptable. The Missouri Constitution is explicit: redistricting happens after the Census, once per decade. There is no provision for redrawing maps “whenever it suits you.” To divide Kansas City, dilute Black and urban representation, and rig outcomes is a betrayal of your oath and an assault on the rights of every voter in this state.

I submit this testimony in opposition to HB 1. You are undermining the very values that US Democracy is built on by moving this bill forward. I’m embarrassed by this blatantly illegal power grab from our elected officials. You do not want this to be your legacy from your time in office.

Missouri has overturned the will of the people time and time again, and it’s time this ends. Missouri republicans are in the back pocket of a convicted felon, rapist, and authoritarian. I strongly oppose H.B. 1 and any other attempt to redraw Missouris congressional map before the 2026 midterm election. This will rob voters of their rights. This will rob the 40% of Missourians who vote democratic ticket. Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.

I am against anything against the well being of the working class

Missouri maps should not be determined by the President of the United States. This bill is an attempt by the majority party to pick their voters which is an undemocratic attempt to preserve the congressional majority in Washington. Listening to the hearing today, it’s clear there is no legitimate reason to change maps other than aquiesing to President Trump. We are not blind.

Representatives should be chosen by the voters and should actually work in the interests of voters. Communities don’t want this. We are tired of people not working in the best interests of people, but for themselves. As a veteran I am embarrassed of these leaders.

What in the world do you all think you’re doing?! It is only legal to redistrict immediately following a census. I’m not sure why you all think you make adjustments at the whim of an authoritarian president. I vehemently oppose this bill. The world is watching the US democracy collapse; Missouri does not have to contribute even more to its inevitability!

Elected officials should represent all constituents who reside in the state. I fear there will be a time that the state is turned into a battleground as it swings back and forth between parties rather than honoring one person one vote representing all of the people. Missouri is a state with priorities that differ region to region. All of the regions should be represented by people who can and will represent them. This attempt to silence opposing views is anti-democratic and anti-American. It diminishing the state.

I don’t support this. You should not either.

I could list all the reasons why redistricting Missouri in the manner is wrong. But you know them all
already.

I could call you out on the fact that this is a blatant power grab. But you know this, and you know we
know.

I could speak on all the ways you openly lie to your constituents and yourselves, because you’ve seen the playbook where lies are rewarded with power. You know.

I could state facts that are irrefutable regarding how your continued support of flawed policy and radically unpopular and undemocratic ideas are tearing apart our economy, our communities, our democracy, and our peace. You know.

And with all your knowledge and all your facts, you will bend the knee to the same bad ideas. Showing no leadership or moral compass. Digging the hole that has kept you from facing your constituents ever deeper.

But many of us were raised by the golden rule. To love thy neighbor. That people faught, marched, and died for equal rights, equal protections, equal say, freedom, and democracy.

Your vote to pass redistricting in Missouri just proves everything they say about you. That you can’t win without cheating. That you are in office for your own self interest. That you believe Missouri communities are not deserving of representation. And that there’s just absolutely and unequivocally people in this state that you don’t care about. Well that’s not true, you care enough to take their vote and their voice.

You’ll probably vote to pass this, pat yourselves on the back and bask in the glow of dollars thrown your way. And for a moment you will rest in what you’ve done. But one thing I know, you will all crumble to the consequences of these actions. You will lose family, friends, coworkers, respect, community, and at some point the power you sold your soul for.

I hope this moment in time, and the disgust you reap upon yourselves is worth it.

This is illegal and unconstitutional. It is totally a racist, political power grab to attempt to steal representation from the voters of District 5. It is our governor’s attempt to please President Trump. This is not democratic. Elections must be won fairly, or we risk becoming a facist country. This is wrong! Please do not allow it.

I am vehemently opposed to this unconstitutional attempt to redraw Missouri congressional districts to disenfranchise voters who do not support the Trump agenda. The Republican Party claims to be the party of small government but have proven time and time again that they are only interested in serving the elite and capitulating to the requests of Donald Trump. These attempts to redraw districts mid-decade illustrate how unpopular the Republican agenda is and makes it crystal clear that they feel they can only win elections by cheating. Missouri republicans have lost their moral compass and sold their souls to Donald Trump and the billionaire class. Missouri has significant issues that need to be addressed, but instead of focusing on solutions to address our impending budget crisis, lack of resources in rural areas of the state and the hundreds of foster children sleeping in offices every year due to a shortage of appropriate foster homes, the governor and legislature have decided once again to prioritize Donald Trump over the best interest of Missourians.

Restricting and changing the Missouri constitution denies Missouri voters our voice. You were elected to serve the people, and now you are rigging our state to serve a power hungry elite who could care less about strengthening our communities. This is the opposite of servant leadership. Is this the legacy you want to leave for the citizens of Missouri?

This is clearly designed to cheat fair elections. If you want votes, then promote policies that voters want. This administration has twice voted to overturn the will of the people with the right to body autonomy and health insurance coverage and now proposes to silence our voices altogother by suppressing our votes . If you don’t want a democracy, move elsewhere.

When we decide whether people deserve representation or land deserves representation, it will be only the corrupt who choose land. The history of this country is time and again, power being given to land owners over Slaves, over women, over immigrants. Time and again, history has sided with individuals. Be on the right side of history.

Please do not disenfranchise us further. I would like to feel like my vote matters. This is extremely deceptive since you are already not respecting what we voted for back in November. This is absolutely unacceptable.

[….] I am a lifelong Missourian speaking today in opposition to House Bill 1 (HB 1), introduced on September 3, 2025, which creates provisions for redistricting Missouri’s federal congressional districts.

Why I Oppose This Bill

1. It risks undermining fair representation.

Redistricting inherently shapes how and whose voices are heard. Without transparent, impartial criteria, HB 1 could enable partisan maps that prioritize political advantage over democratic representation. Missourians deserve maps drawn with integrity, not political gain.

2. It is out of the political norm.

Traditionally, redistricting is handled in regular order with an expectation of broad consultation and balanced input. To take up a bill of this magnitude in a rushed special session, without clear public demand, signals a departure from established norms. This sets a troubling precedent for how we govern and undermines the legitimacy of the process.

3. It lacks meaningful public input and community-centered criteria.

Fair redistricting should prioritize preserving communities of interest, geographic continuity, and voter cohesion. HB 1 is silent on these standards, making the process disconnected from the people it impacts and further eroding public trust.

4. Unchecked redistricting decisions foster political polarization.

When district lines are drawn to favor one party, elections become less competitive, and elected officials feel less accountable to all constituents. Missouri needs leaders who represent diverse voices, not legislators insulated by heavily gerrymandered districts.

What Missourians Deserve Instead

Independent redistricting commissions structured to prevent self-dealing and ensure maps serve the people rather than insiders

Clear, publicly available criteria, including respect for communities of interest and geographic compactness

Open, participatory processes with accessible hearings and meaningful opportunities for citizen feedback

For redistricting to reinforce democracy, it must be rooted in transparency, fairness, and public involvement, not in political maneuvering.

Conclusion

I respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1. Missouri deserves a redistricting process that protects fairness
in representation, transparency in decision-making, and public trust in government. To pass this bill
now, in this way, would be both harmful and outside the norms of responsible governance.

Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully,
[….]

Opposition in the thousands. But the right wingnut super-majority in the Missouri General Assembly won’t listen.

Salus populi suprema lex esto – “The welfare of the people shall be the supreme law.”

Exraordinary Session – HB 1: And who might that be for?

03 Tuesday Dec 2013

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Boeing, HB 1, missouri

Previously:

Boeing Boeing (November 27, 2013)

Gov. Jay Nixon: Mega Corporation Monday (November 29, 2013)

The Boeing bill has been introduced in the Missouri General Assembly:

FIRST EXTRAORDINARY SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 1

97TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE ZERR.

0005H.01I            D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 620, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to economic development for aerospace projects, with an emergency clause.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

           Section A. Chapter 620, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 620.2550, to read as follows:

           620.2550. 1. As used in this section, the following terms shall mean:

           (1) “Aerospace project”, a project undertaken on or after December 10, 2013 by or for the benefit of a qualified company with a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) industry classification of 3364 involving the creation of at least two thousand new jobs within ten years following the approval of a notice of intent under section 620.2020;

           (2) “Job creation, worker training, and infrastructure development programs”, the Missouri works program established under sections 620.2000 to 620.2020, Missouri business use incentives for large-scale development act established under sections 100.700 to 100.850, the Missouri works training program established under sections 620.800 to 620.809, and the real property tax increment allocation redevelopment act established under sections 99.800 to 99.865.

           2. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, no benefits authorized under job creation, worker training, and infrastructure development programs for an aerospace project shall be considered in determining compliance with applicable limitations on the aggregate amount of benefits that may be awarded annually or cumulatively under such programs. No aerospace project shall be authorized for state benefits under job creation, worker training, and infrastructure development programs that exceed, in the aggregate, one hundred and fifty million dollars annually under all such programs.

           Section B. Because economic development is vital for the continued success of the Missouri economy, this act is deemed necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, welfare, peace, and safety, and is hereby declared to be an emergency act within the meaning of the constitution, and this act shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval.

[emphasis in original]

“…involving the creation of at least two thousand new jobs within ten years…”

That’s a requirement to create at least 200 jobs a year for ten years – with up to $150 million in incentives per year.

Does the math really work out? Just asking.

Bills in the Missouri General Assembly Special Session: Peter, meet Paul

27 Sunday Jun 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

HB 1, HB 2, HFR 1, Jay Nixon, jobs, missouri, pensions, SB 1, Special Session, tax credits

The Missouri General Assembly is now in a special session, called by Governor Jay Nixon, for the purpose of enacting incentives for Ford to create and retain jobs at its Claycomo plant and paying for those incentives by creating a second tier retirement system for new state employees.

You know, robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Peter, in the form of HB 1 (on pensions)

…. (2) Requires any person who first becomes a state employee on or after January 1, 2011, to be a member of the Missouri State Employees’ Retirement System (MOSERS) Year 2000 Plan….

….A member of this plan must contribute 4% of his or her pay to the system….

[emphasis added]

Paul, in form of HB 2 (on incentives for job creation/retention incentives directed at Ford, though not by name), from the Bill Summary:

….(2)  Defines “qualified supplier” as a company that:

…. d) Provides health insurance to employees and pays at least 50% of the insurance premiums….

[emphasis added]

Uh, is offering a tax incentive to a company which requires they offer health insurance considered “socialized health care”? Just asking. And to think the bill was sponsored by a republican in the Missouri General Assembly. But, I digress.

Then there’s this gem of a quote by the sponsor of the Senate version of the pension bill, Senator Jason Crowell (r), in today’s Kansas City Star:

….Crowell, the architect of the reform legislation, said changes are critical for the state to keep up with broader trends in retirement.

“If you look at where this pension system is, based on where the private sector is, I think any taxpayer would call this necessary reform,” Crowell said….

Is Senator Crowell (r) endorsing a private sector pay scale for all public employees in the State of Missouri?

Then again, the comparison doesn’t quite work – from a technical note in the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Costs For Employee Compensation – March 2010 [pdf] news release:

…Compensation cost levels in State and local government should not be directly compared with levels in private industry. Differences between these sectors stem from factors such as variation in work activities and occupational structures. Manufacturing and sales, for example, make up a large part of private industry work activities but are rare in State and local government. Professional and administrative support occupations (including teachers) account for two-thirds of the State and local government workforce, compared with one-half of private industry….

And in higher education [pdf] (the provisions of this bill would apply to public higher education employees in Missouri):

…Salary is one of many factors considered by prospective faculty members in weighing offers of employment; many of today’s academics are prepared to move among institutions (and private sector industries) for a more favorable compensation package. When top faculty members leave to pursue other opportunities, local and regional economic development can suffer through the associated loss of external funding, technology transfer and other entrepreneurial activity, and the loss of talented researchers and graduate students brought and attracted by cutting-edge scholars….

What effect do you think a reduction in pension benefits will have on recruiting and retaining new faculty at Missouri’s public higher education institutions? Just asking.

So much for promoting the long term economic development potential of the state, eh? That defeats the whole stated purpose of the special session, don’t you think? Peter and Paul, meet the Missouri General Assembly.

Retaining and and creating new jobs at the Ford Claycomo plant and for their suppliers is a good thing. It’s the General Assembly’s proposed method of paying for it that has me worried about the unintended consequences elsewhere.

In the Senate SB 1 [pdf] also addresses the public employee pension issue. The different language in the House and Senate bills will have to be reconciled. The Summary of SB1:

SB 1 – This act modifies provisions relating to retirement.

This act creates a new retirement plan for any person who becomes a state employee on or after January 1, 2011. To be eligible for normal retirement under this plan, employees will be required to reach age sixty-seven and have at least ten years of service or reach age fifty-five with the sum of the member’s age and service equaling at least ninety, uniformed members of the highway patrol with a mandatory retirement age of sixty will be required to reach age sixty or reach age fifty-five with ten years credited service, members of the general assembly will be required to reach age sixty-two and complete at least three full biennial assemblies or reach age fifty-five with the sum of the member’s age and service equaling at least ninety, and statewide elected officials will be required to reach age sixty-two and complete at least four years of service or reach age fifty-five with the sum of the official’s age and service equaling at least ninety. Employees, except for uniformed members of the highway patrol, are eligible for early retirement at age sixty-two with ten years of service. Employees must work for the state for ten years to vest in the retirement system. Members of this retirement plan will be required to contribute four percent of their pay to the retirement system. Members will not be able to purchase credit in the retirement plan for their past non-federal full-time public employment, their military service, or transfer credit from other public retirement plans. The employee contribution rate, the benefits under the year 2000 plan, and any other provision of the year 2000 plan may be altered, amended, increased, decreased, or repealed, but such change will only apply to service or interest credits after the effective date of the change. Employees under this plan shall not be eligible for the Backdrop option, which provides a lump sum payment at retirement for those working at least two years beyond normal retirement eligibility. (Section 104.1091)

This act also creates the Missouri State Retirement Investment Board. This board may manage the investment of the assets of the Missouri State Employees Retirement System (MOSERS) and the Missouri Department of Transportation and Highway Patrol Employees Retirement System (MPERS). The board may also administer the deferred compensation plan for state employees and the existing college and university defined contribution plan. Other Missouri public pension systems may upon approval of the system or plan and approval of the board enter an agreement with the board to provide investment oversight and management. The board is prohibited from managing the investments of the Public School Retirement System (PSRS), the Public Education Employee Retirement System(PEERS), the Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System (LAGERS), the Public School Retirement System of St. Louis, the Public School Retirement System of Kansas City and the retirement plans established by the Bi-State Development Agency and the Reg
ional Investment District.

Before the investment board is authorized to manage the investment of assets, the boards of MOSERS and MPERS must each vote to irrevocably transfer oversight and management of the investment of assets managed by these retirement systems to the investment board. If either the MOSERS or MPERS board do not transfer its assets, then the powers and duties of the investment board lapse and the board is prohibited from overseeing or managing any funds.

The Missouri State Retirement Investment Board is organized as a body corporate and instrumentality of the state with its records subject to the sunshine law and its meetings open to the public. The company’s initial capital is provided on an equitable basis by MOSERS and MPERS. MOSERS and MPERS may transfer any of their executives or employees to the company, except for their executive directors.

The board has seven members, the executive director of MOSERS, the executive director of MPERS, the commissioner of administration, and four members appointed by the governor, initially from a list of names submitted by the executive directors of MOSERS and MPERS, and subsequently from a list of names submitted by board members. The governor has the right to reject any or all of the people on the list submitted by the executive directors or the list submitted by the board members. If the governor rejects any of the people recommended on the lists, the executive directors or the board members, as the case may be, are required to submit a list of two people for each vacant position. This process shall continue until no position on the board remains vacant.

No member of the board or member of the MOSERS or MPERS board may be employed by the board or have a business relationship with any service provider of the board for two years after the end of their membership on the board. No current or former member of the general assembly or statewide elected official may become an employee of the board or work for or have a business relationship with any service provider of the board for five years after their service in the general assembly or as a statewide elected official has ended.

The assets of these retirement systems may be held by the board in a collective trust fund for investment as a single pool. The board is not liable for any payment they make as directed by the executive director, chief executive officer, or other person designated by the retirement system. The administrative and investment expenses of the board shall be apportioned among the retirement systems.

The assets of MOSERS and MPERS will be transferred to the board over a transition period after the MOSERS and MPERS boards elect to transfer the management of investments to the investment board. MOSERS and MPERS are responsible for managing their assets until they are transferred to the board. (Sections 104.1500 to 104.1506).

The act also creates a new retirement plan for any person who first becomes a judge on or after January 1, 2011. Judges will be required to reach age sixty-seven and have at least twelve years of service or reach age sixty-two and have twenty years of service before they are eligible for normal retirement. If a judge retires at age sixty-seven with less than twelve years of service, or at sixty-two with less than twenty years service, their retirement compensation will be reduced proportionately. Judges in this retirement plan will be required to contribute four percent of their compensation to the retirement system. Judges will not be able to purchase credit in the retirement plan for their past non-federal full-time public employment or their military service. Judges under this plan who continue to work after their normal retirement date will not have cost-of-living increases added to their retirement compensation for the period of time between their eligibility for retirement and their actual retirement date. When a retired judge under this plan dies, their beneficiary will not receive an amount equal to fifty percent of the judge’s retirement compensation. Instead, judges will make a choice at retirement among the benefit payment options, that includes options for the amount received by the beneficiary. The employee contribution rate, the benefits under the judicial retirement plan, and any other provision of the judicial retirement plan may be altered, amended, increased, decreased, or repealed, but such change will only apply to service or interest credits after the effective date of the change. (Sections 476.521 and 476.529)

This act prohibits a retired judge who becomes employed after January 1, 2011, as an employee eligible to participate in the MOSERS retirement plan, from receiving their judicial retirement benefits while they are employed. Any judge who serves as a judge while he or she is receiving their judicial retirement is prohibited from receiving their judicial retirement while serving as a judge. A judge who serves as a senior judge or senior commissioner while receiving judicial retirement will continue to receive judicial retirement and additional credit and salary for their service. (Section 476.527)

This act is similar to the perfected version of SB 714 (2010).

And, to add to the fun, another republican in the House introduced a joint resolution, HJR 1:

Proposes a constitutional amendment limiting any increase in the merchants’ and manufacturers’ replacement tax, allowing local governing bodies to reduce the rate, and eliminating the tax in 2015.

Yes, yes, let’s keep cutting revenue. That’ll really help to stabilize the cash flow problems for government entities in Missouri, right?

Recent Posts

  • Fixed it for us
  • Campaign Finance: more than enough, always
  • Mark Alford (r): passing gas
  • Campaign Finance: Sure, why not?
  • The price we all pay so that the 1% can redistribute our wealth

Recent Comments

The price we all pay… on “Up, Up and Away……
HB 2075: Who checks?… on Hey Brandon Phelps (r), we hea…
Campaign Finance: a… on Campaign Finance: Working Peop…
The mail pieces have… on Are you certain it wasn’…
In our town | Show M… on ICE Whistles

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,032,942 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...