Eric Greitens’ (r) 2016 gubernatorial campaign filed its January quarterly campaign finance report with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15th:
C151053: Greitens For Missouri
Committee Type: Candidate
4579 Laclede Ave #138 Party Affiliation: Republican
St Louis Mo 63108 Established Date: 02/24/2015
[….]Information Reported On: 2016 – January Quarterly Report
Beginning Money on Hand $2,284,943.44
Monetary Receipts + $1,506,546.60
Monetary Expenditures – $337,593.40
Contributions Made – $0.00
Other Disbursements – $19,665.03
Subtotal $1,149,288.17
Ending Money On Hand $3,434,231.61
[emphasis added]

Contributions reported on Eric Greitens’ (r) quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15, 2016.
There was one contribution from the Michael L Goguen Trust in Menlo Park, California (for a total of $1,000,000.00 to the campaign so far). There were five contributions of $50,000.00, ten contributions of $25,000.00, one contribution of $20,000.00, four contributions of $15,000.00, nine contributions of $10,000.00, and 101 contributions between $5,500.00 and $1,000.00.

Contributions broken down by Missouri and out-of-state reported on Eric Greitens’ (r) quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15, 2016.
Fifty-seven percent of the total amount of contributions to the campaign came from out-of-state, with California and New York the sources for the largest number of such contributions.
From Georgia:

Contribution reported on Eric Greitens’ (r) quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15, 2016.
Yes, that Ralph Reed.
From Connecticut:

Contribution reported on Eric Greitens’ (r) quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15, 2016.

Contribution reported on Eric Greitens’ (r) quarterly campaign finance report filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission on January 15, 2016.
Wrestle with that.
Some of the expenditures:
MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION
ITEMIZED EXPENDITURES OVER $100 SUPPLEMENTAL FORM
GREITENS FOR MISSOURI [pdf] 1/15/2016Something Else Strategies 2112 Golden Willow Court Easley SC 29642 10/19/2015 Video Production $63,754.92
The MK Group 5905 Gloster Road Bethesda MD 20816 10/19/2015 Fundraising Services $7,874.20
Push Digital PO Box 21892 Charleston SC 29413 10/28/2015 On-Line Marketing $34,783.67
The Spark Agency PO Box 790379 St Louis MO 63179 10/29/2015 Event Expense $11,556.69
The MK Group 5905 Gloster Road Bethesda MD 20816 11/12/2015 Fundraising Services $7,500.00
Bask Digital Media 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 1240 Sherman Oaks CA 91403 12/2/2015 On-line Marketing $8,000.00
Push Digital PO Box 21892 Charleston SC 29413 12/17/2015 On-line Marketing $2,372.29
[emphasis added]
Previously:
Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 21 (December 23, 2015)
Campaign Finance: “Alright everyone, gird your loins…” (December 28, 2015)
Campaign Finance: one out of three ain’t too bad (December 29, 2015)
Campaign Finance: it’s tough when you’ve got to raise your $3,000,000.00 in $50,000.00 increments (January 1, 2016)
Campaign Finance: Well, okay, $500,000.00 at a time… (January 2, 2016)
Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 22 (January 6, 2016)
Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 23 (January 8, 2016)
Campaign Finance: friendly neighbors (January 11, 2016)
Campaign Finance: San Francisco! (January 13, 2016)
Pingback: Campaign Finance: Nope… | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: not something you see every day | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 24 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 25 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: look at that | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: a true friend | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: Leawood, Kansas! | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: pretty soon we’ll be talking about some serious money | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 26 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s just so…boring | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 27 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 28 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 29 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 30 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s the thought that counts | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: Portlandia | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 31 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 32 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: once more, with feeling | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 33 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 34 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 35 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 36 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: now you’re talkin’ | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: where the action is | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 37 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: wrestle with this | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 38 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: working on that all important out-of-state contribution ratio | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: Beverly Hills, 90210 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: MO candidate’s first TV ad is a gun-totin’ spectacle - Occasional Planet
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 48 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: milk money | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 49 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: it’s like a campaign contribution, only smaller – part 50 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: can’t vote in the primary, can’t vote in the general, can write the check | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Donald J. Trump, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: another billionaire | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: Such a nice gesture, but why bother? | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: endless Summer | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: reloading | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: not exactly a paragon of transparency | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: so very strange | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Missouri State Fair Governor’s Ham Breakfast – August 18, 2016 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: so very strange – part 2 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: so very strange – part 3 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: just passing through | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Campaign Finance: diversification | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Our top ten traffic posts for 2016 | Show Me Progress
Pingback: Gov. Eric Greitens (r) – January 2017 Quarterly Campaign Finance Report | Show Me Progress