• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: July 2008

Voter ID Bill Revisited

14 Monday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

missouri, Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State, voter ID

Since the lege is bringing back the zombie Voter ID bill, I thought I would repost in full a diary I did last summer. Seems relevant and all. -Clark

We dodged a bullet at the end of the last legislative session when Republicans failed to move a new voter ID bill through the Missouri Legislature before the session came to an end. So why bother with another post on the topic? Because we can’t sit on our laurels, especially when the “victory” was just running out the clock. Whether it’s voter caging, voter purging, or voter ID laws, Republican voter suppression methods are like zombies – they keep coming back until decapitated. So let’s revisit what the voter ID bill means for Missouri, before Republicans resurrect it in the special session, or next regular session, or via ballot initiative.

Secretary of State Robin Carnahan and her office did an excellent job of assembling illustrative anecdotes from real people who would be affected if voters were required to present a government-issued ID (we are already required to present some sort of identification), but as they say, the plural of anecdote is not data. They also released an estimate of how many Missouri voters would be disenfranchised by the government ID requirement, which was about 240,000. But I was curious about where in Missouri these voters might live, so I requested a county-by-county breakdown of how many voters would be disenfranchised.

I was curious to see whether most of those affected lived in the big cities, since the elderly, the poor and minorities would be most affected, and the stereotype is that all poverty and people of color are collected in urban areas. Sure enough, in absolute numbers, Kansas City, St. Louis, and St. Louis County rank at the top of the list.

But added together, the outstate counties actually contain more of the potentially disenfranchised voters.  Out of 241,682 disenfranchised, only 40,900 live in the cities of St. Louis and Kansas City, and 57,200 live in the suburban counties of Saint Louis and Jackson. The rest live around the state. Greene County  alone (where Springfield sits) has 11,787 potentially disenfranchised voters to Jackson County’s 10,365 (suburban KC – a population nearly triple that of Springfield.)

It gets a lot worse (illustrated with a map and tables!) below the flip.

You can make a good case against a Voter ID bill by looking only  at absolute numbers, but that’s missing half the picture. I pulled up the totals for registered voters by county, and looked at the disenfranchised voters as a percentage of registered voters in the county (to control for the much denser population in the cities and suburbs.) Suddenly, a stark vision of just how bad a Voter ID bill would be for the entire state drops into sharper relief. In fact, the hardest hit counties would be rural counties. Let’s look at a map. Blue counties are below 4% disenfranchisement, yellow means between 4-8%, orange is 8-10%, and red stands for greater than 10% who would be disenfranchised.

Mo Map.jpg

St. Louis County has the highest absolute number of potentially disenfranchised voters, but expressed as a percentage of total registered voters, it ranks just above Greene County. St. Louis City has the second highest absolute number, but ranks just above Jasper County (Joplin) if viewed as a percentage of registered voters.

11(!) counties would lose 10% or more of their voters. The hardest hit county is Schuyler, with a whopping 21.39% of its registered voters no longer being able to vote. Other counties  with big chunks of disenfranchised voters include Reynolds (20.64%), Pemiscot (15.81%) and Marion (15.14%)

This is a major concern not only for the presidential and statewide contests, but for races up and down the ticket. The people most likely to be disenfranchised are also most likely to vote Democratic. If we lose 5 to 20 percent of Democratic voters in counties all across Missouri, especially if many of the hardest hit are clustered together in state senate and congressional districts, it gets progressively harder to elect a Democrat in those districts.

Let’s look at Wes Shoemyer (D-18), the Democratic senator from NE Missouri. He was elected in 2006 by 1,842 votes. If the voter ID bill were in place at the time, he wouldn’t have been elected – 5 of the hardest hit counties are in his district. Knocking out the ability for Democrats to win downticket also hurts the chances of Democrats in later statewide contests, because the Democratic bench will thin out.

Beyond mere partisan concerns, giving the poor even less of a voice in our electoral system is the best way to ensure that those in need are ignored when it comes time to make state policy. And all of it in response to a problem that is completely made up. Not that I expect the Missouri GOP to care about that, since they are the ones concern trolling here, but everyone else ought to be outraged.

The full list of counties, in order of voter disenfranchisement percentage, is below for your perusal.

Voter list 1.jpg

Voter list 2.jpg

Brett Penrose: circling predatory lenders

14 Monday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

bank failures, Brett Penrose

Brett Penrose knows what happens when you keep the barn door open – the taxpayer bill comes home to roost, the villains fly the coop.

Could this be the reason Matt Blunt opted not to seek a second term?

13 Sunday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

homosexuality, matt blunt, missouri

As soon as Governor Matt Blunt of Missouri announced that he would not be seeking a second term “because he had accomplished everything in one term” that he set out to achieve; we were immediately suspicious and doubted his claim because there are still a few people receiving Medicaid.

Almost immediately my phone started ringing, and every single call laid out a plausible scenario for an impending indictment, most of them based on the fee-office fiasco from his first months in office. During every single one of those calls I made some notes, and then filed them away, waiting for corroboration that never came.

Most recently, the rumor has been pervasive – he is going to be “outed.”  

On Friday, I got an email from a prominent attorney friend of mine with the subject line URGENT! CALL ME ASAP!!! so I did – I tend to always comply with urgent messages from attorneys – and I got some details.

Now folks, I can’t stress this enough –  it is still just a rumor until you read it in the Post-Dispatch – but here is what we have on good authority will be substantiated in the coming days…

The governor has had an ongoing homosexual relationship with a 29-year-old real estate broker from the St. Louis area.

Apparently, Matty B is one of those self-loathing gay people who publicly rail against their inner selves, almost like they are engaging in some form of exorcism – “if I say it enough, and believe hard enough, I won’t be gay any more.”

I tried to dig up some quotes and comments from both Matt and his father Roy. All I felt was ill.

I am the mother of three fantastic children – and the youngest one happens to be a lesbian. This does not make me love her any less, nor do I think she should “change” because some people are narrow-minded and priggish. My daughter is gay. She is also well adjusted and healthy and happy because she grew up in an environment knowing that she was loved unconditionally and that would never change.

Some of her friends in the gay community are not so lucky – many of them were dragged to therapists and psychiatrists and medicated against their will by parents intent on “fixing” them. Many more were unable to cope and acted out – cutting and self-mutilation, drug abuse and self medication – kids kicked out of the house and onto the street while still in high school for the sin of being born gay.

Revisiting some of the hateful spewings that have emanated from Roy Blunt just broke my heart after I put it in the context of a little boy, just entering adolescence, who is starting to figure out his sexuality and suspects he might be different. It’s enough to make you want to break down and sob.

What really pisses me off is the fact that adults, intent on absolute control, damage their kids for not being what they, the parents, envisioned.

Parents, love your kids. Unconditionally. And if you don’t have the capacity to do that, then you have no business even attempting to parent.  

Michelle Obama in Kansas City – Q and A

13 Sunday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Kansas City, Michelle Obama, missouri

“…And when you have to pay for justice, no one can afford it…” – from the audience

“…We’re a family friendly society, we have to have family friendly rules…” – a member of the panel

Our previous coverage of the July 10th round table discussion at Pierson Auditorium on the campus of the University of Missouri – Kansas City:

Michelle Obama in Kansas City – remarks

Michelle Obama in Kansas City – photos

Michelle Obama in Kansas City – the audience gathers

The question and answer portion of the event:

….Q: My question is about Social Security. Which is another women’s issue, also. We hear that it’s not gonna be there, but unfortunately there’s a large part of Social Security that the government uses, not for us. And, I mean, I feel they need to not do that, keep dipping into that. And that’s why, one of the reasons why we won’t have any for the younger people. [applause]

Michelle Obama: I don’t want to misstate Barack’s position. That’s always one of the tricky parts about being a spouse out here. [laughter] ‘Cause I, I don’t know everything  he knows. But I do know that generally Barack is, you know, believes in the importance of Social Security and doing the work that we need to do to save it. For the reasons that you just outlined. There are generations of people who need it. There are many more that are counting on it. I don’t know what the plan is to do that, but we can definitely get you more information on his plan for dealing with Social Security. We’ve got our policy people here, so if somebody will just make sure to follow up specifically with this, with this woman and anybody else who has questions about Barack’s specific proposal on Social Security – we’ll get that to you. [applause] [garbled] first.

Q: Good morning Michelle. I just want to say we really thank you being here. One of my questions, I guess, I wanted to inquire on minority businesses. I’m a minority business myself and it’s really a touchy subject for a lot of governments at this time. And getting minority participation on projects is kind of like, I haven’t heard about it too much, so I wanted to kind of ask what was the position [garbled].

Michelle Obama: You know, again, I’m not sure of Barack’s specific position on minority women owned businesses, minority owned businesses, but I do know that we come from a state where the kind of investment in insuring that these businesses can grow and thrive and have, have access to compete is, is top of mind. But one of the things that Barack has found out is, is becoming just as critical to the survival of woman and minority owned businesses and all small businesses. It still boils down to the question of health care costs. Because what he’s hearing from small businesses all over the country, regardless of the, the nature of the business, is that these businesses are having difficulty surviving because, you know, well, one business owner yesterday in, in Pontiac was saying that they’re still trying to pay for eighty per cent of health care costs for their employers, for their employees. If you imagine what an economic drain that is, because the unpredictability of costs for a small business is the same that it is for individuals as co-pays are going up and so on and so forth. And small businesses want to be able to do this. They know that that’s, you know, an important resource to have for recruitment and retention, But it’s becoming very difficult and what we’re finding is that there are a lot of people who aren’t even trying to start new businesses because of health care costs. It’s not because they’re not innovative, they don’t have the ideas, they can’t develop the capital. It’s because when they look at the costs of insurance it is just too great of a burden. So we’re hearing more and more that even as important as the ability to compete for business, is the ability to thrive as a business. So, you know, that, that’s why this universal health care piece is, it is so critical. That is why it, it is on the top, it isn’t accidental. It’s not that the other issues for Barack aren’t important, it’s just that when you start pulling apart that, you know, some of these big ticket items like education and energy and, and health care that they, they impact so much of what this economy can and can’t do on so many levels that if we don’t fix that, to begin anywhere else is almost, you know, it, it’s not realistic to expect a solution when the big, you know, the big problem is health care.

Okay, so we have time for one more, let’s give this young lady right here, I’m trying to spread the wealth. Unless somebody tells me we can do more questions. Uh! Okay. We can do another one.

Q: Well, I didn’t really have a question I had a comment. Is that okay?

Michelle Obama: That’s, that’s okay. [laughter]

Q: ‘Cause I wanted to share…

Michelle Obama: No, you must leave. [laughter]

Q: [laughter] I wanted to share a story with you because I believe that you’re gonna  be the next first lady…

Michelle Obama: Well, that’s very…

Q: …and I hope… [cheers] [applause] …and I believe that you care about people’s difficulties that they have. My name is XXXXX and I’m a working mother with like fifty hours. And, you know, when I get up every day what I think about’s my son. My son’s name is XXXXX. That’s all I think about. That’s what that motivates me. And I’m fighting to be with my son. The Jackson County Family Court is keeping me from doing that. And also my son’s father. Channel 41, the local station, did a story on it. And I just wanted to tell you a, a recession affects people in different ways. But people that are in litigation, especially concerning their families, it’s the worst. Because you’re not just choosing between your car, you know, things you have, maybe going out. I’m choosing between paying bills and having a chance to be with my son. And so is my son’s father. And I also wanted to say that, you know, as, it’s, it’s a little off subject, as related to something that Barack said, about fathers stepping up to be with their children, to support their children. There is a system in this country where even in family courts they’re keeping people from doing that. People want to step up. People want to take care of their children. But they’re keeping them from doing that. And when you have to pay for justice, no one can afford it. I can’t afford it, he can’t afford it. [applause] [garbled]

Michelle Obama: Thank you for that. Thank you for that. [applause] [garbled] You know, and, and Sister Berta [sp] you may want to talk a little bit about this because this has come up as well in every round table is that the challenges that people are facing in foster care, in the court systems as well, you know, you may want to talk a bit about those struggles because, you know, and also I want to make sure that people understand that, you know, as Barack talks about his experiences growing up without a father. That that in no way doesn’t recognize that there’s serious problems in, in the system at all. I think part of what we all have to do in addition to fighting the system and making sure there’s equity and that people have the resources to, to keep their families whole, I think Barack is always of the view that we have to talk about all sides of the coin. You know, that as we’re talking about that fight we also have to recognize that there are people who do have complete ability an access to do what they need to do. And sometimes in the face of all that is bad we don’t always do what’s, what’s the best as individuals. And part of Barack’s message will always be there’s government responsibility and ac
countability, but there is individual [voice: “Yeah.”] responsibility [applause] and accountability. And, and one never cancels out the other, you know. So, as a part of this conversation, as a part of healing, our growth as a nation we have to own what we do right, own what we do wrong, and work to fix the stuff that is in, within, our, our power as individuals and communities [applause] and families. So, so, you want to talk just a little bit about what you’ve seen? [crosstalk]

Panelist: Well, I, I think systems were designed originally to help families. But what happens, I think, is systems stay the same and the families change and so the systems become useless. You know, you get, you get, it’s easier to get into the court system than to get out of it. [laughter] And, one of the issues I think with, with fathers, I’ve been around a while, but I never tell my age, but anyway [laughter]. When I first came here, to get welfare, they went in your home, looked in your cabinets to see if there were men’s stuff anywhere. If there was, you were denied. And now we are blaming the women because they don’t have stable relationships. If one of our moms who was working at a fast food place marries the man that works next to her she loses health insurance, child care, any housing help, and food stamps. And yet we say we’re such a family friendly society and we believe fathers should be at home taking care of their children. But we, we create systems that cause them not to be able to, and then we turn around and blame the women for not doing a better job at this. And I think a lot of this stuff that ends up in court is part of the issue. And we, we have, we’re a family friendly society, we have to have family friendly rules. Which means if a couple gets married we support them, not completely, but help them for a while, and ease them off of it. If a mother comes in and tells me she’s getting married it’s, I don’t say, I say, “Oh good” and I’m thinking that’s not a good economic decision. [audience voices] It should be. It should be the best decision. And so our systems are destroying our families. And I don’t know how to fix it. But somebody needs to fix this because we pay a huge price for these kids. Kids growing with foster care, what seventy per cent end up as homeless kids. And when they’re eighteen they get a hundred dollars, they drop them at a shelter. I mean, come on, we can do better than this. We do better with our pets in this country. And I like pets, but we do. [applause]

Michelle Obama: How much time do we have? Melissa? [laughter] Melissa on your Blackberry. Oh, you know what? In all fairness, you’re, you’re, you’re back here. I [garbled] . I know. I’m trying to spread the wealth. This gentleman. Do we have a mic over here? Coming, it’s coming. That was hard. [laughter]

Q: My name is XXXXX, I actually go to UMKC here and, and I’m one of the student advocates for the [garbled]. But my question is, we have a lot of students who have issue getting health coverage because they can’t afford to do it with their parents, or their parents don’t allow them to stay on their health insurance because they’re going away to school. They also have issues with things like loans and the Federal Pell grant has stayed the same while the costs for education has gone up over and over again. And students like me, I, I’m a, I’m a, student loan person, I’m a program person, and we just can’t afford to constantly be paying back these loans and we’re worried that the Pell grant isn’t going to increase when it doesn’t cover any of our expenses. Is there anything that, that, that you all foresee as, as [garbled] administration that can help ease that burden, because the Federal government literally covers maybe a fifth of what I have to pay every year? [voice: “Yeah, yeah.”]

Michelle Obama: Yes. [applause] Well, on the, on the insurance front, and just somebody check me, if, if I’m wrong, part of what Barack is proposing in his plan is that students can stay on their parents’ insurance longer. You know, that’s one of the, you know, I don’t want to get it wrong. [laughter] But I, I did notice that as I am a parent, I was like “Whoo, that’d be good.” [laughter] But, you know, part of it is that in, in, I believe in, in some policies, you know, kids get cut off at a certain age and it doesn’t sort of coincide with any realistic life structure that people have. Kids are going to college, they’re still dependent much longer than that. I think that’s why, you know, that would help on the student piece with health care if, if students could stay on. But again, that doesn’t, you know, help you if your family doesn’t have insurance at all. But again, if we had universal health care coverage this kind of stuff, you know, it, it would encompass students and families without insurance and so on and so forth. On the, on the loan grant, on the loan issue, you know, one of Barack’s big proposals around education is linked to his proposal on national service. And we are big national service, we’re big national service family. [applause] Because one of, one of the best jobs I had in my life before going into the hospitals was running an Americorps national service program under the Clinton administration. I run, Americorps was an outstanding idea. And it’s still funded under the current administration, just at lower levels. But, you know, through these types of initiatives young people are do, and, and people of all ages for that matter, that would be part of the expansion, that it wouldn’t have to just apply to college age students. But, our seniors and so on and so forth, you imagine the amount of manpower that could be used and put into child care and health care and elderly care and nursing homes if we had young people who in exchange for their college tuition, you know, you do, you get a little college support, you do a little service. [voice: “Yes.”] And, [applause][cheers] and, and because of that the creation of that Americorps culture under Clinton young people are just exciting, this isn’t, you know, this wouldn’t be hard, young people are doing this already. Service has become a part of the culture, particularly among high school and college age, because many schools and churches require community service. So kids are embracing this already. And it wouldn’t have to be abroad. The Peace Corps is wonderful, that would be an option, but there’s so much that needs to be done around conservation and energy and social services support. Having national service volunteers working with foster families and, and in those systems that would supply more support  – young people would relish the chance to do that and it, and also exposes them to these wonderful careers in public service, which sometimes you don’t always get exposed to in college. Even wonderful institutions in college, you’re majoring in soc, psych, you can be pre-med, you can be a law student, but if you want understand what it meant to be in the foster care system or to run a non-profit organization, to, you know, do a whole, be a community organizer. You don’t, you don’t learn that in college. [voices: “No.”] you know, college is good [garbled] [laughter], love it. We’re gonna probably see more and more of those service learning initiatives coming out of our colleges, well but we’re, you know, we’re growing and what, what, what I found in the young people who did service that they were more inclined to be more civic minded. [voice: “Yes.”] Whether they became lawyers, or investment bankers, hedge fund managers – if you had a taste of working on the ground with people as a college student that affects your thinking forever.

So, [applause][cheers] okay, I just got the cut sign. [laughter] So I, we have to stop. But, you know, let me begin by thanking my panel. [applause] It isn’t easy to sit up here and share your story, stories, but is so helpful. It’s helpful to this campaign, it will be helpful to Barack’s presidency, because one of the things that, you know, I , that Barack understands is, is incumbent upon him as he ascends the rank, is to continue to keep h
is feet planted to the ground and to, to know these stories not just from, you know, anecdotes. But to hear them in settings like this where people let their guards down and they feel the safety of their communities to be able to talk and express. And there’s nothing like the stories that fill your head as you have to advocate and understand how to structure this stuff, and what’s broken, and who’s getting, you know, and understanding that things are not black and white. There’s a ton of gray in life ,you know, as we think about what we want to do and how we want to invest in, in policies. It’s easy, you know, in the vacuum outside of life to think that the answers are so easy. They’re so hard. And they’re so complicated. So, thank you all for sharing and know that we will be working hard to stay grounded and stay focused and to keep fighting. It won’t be easy. So many systems have already been locked in place that it will take decades to unravel, but if we begin the process then maybe we’ll be at a point in time…[applause] So, thank you everyone. [applause]

Donnelly and Harris in Action

13 Sunday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

AG candidates, Chris Koster, Jeff Harris, Margaret Donnelly, missouri

Thursday evening I went to a forum for attorney general candidates that was hosted by former governor Bob Holden at Webster University. I had heard Harris and Donnelly speak at a previous forum (where Koster canceled because of a scheduling conflict). Since I’ve never heard Koster speak but have been told what an excellent speaker he is, I was curious to see how he would impress me.

But oops. He had another scheduling conflict. All I got of Koster was that one audience member asked Donnelly and Harris what they knew about him. I never heard either of them criticize the other all evening or the last time they spoke. They were less kind to Koster. Margaret, at least, was strictly Jack Webb in the information she offered. While Jeff added more facts to her answer, he couldn’t resist a humorous jab or two during the evening.

Both Harris and Donnelly are articulate speakers, not burdened with “umms” or “I thinks” or other distracting verbal quirks. What strikes you when they have a chance to talk in some detail about their goals is how focused they are on improving Missouri. Which is something there’s a lot of room for after the godawful governance we’ve had of recent years under Republicans.  

Robin Carnahan on panel at Netroots Nation

13 Sunday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

missouri, Netroots Nation, Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State

Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan will be on a panel – Reforming and Improving the Presidential Candidate Selection Process, Saturday, July 19th 3:00 PM – 4:15 PM, at Netroots Nation in Austin, Texas.

Photoblog from MoveOn's Rally for an Oil-Free President

12 Saturday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Last Wednesday, the St. Louis MoveOn council joined over 200 other cities in holding a Rally for an Oil-Free President.  The event was designed to highlight the close connections between John McCain and Big Oil.  Right now, McCain’s campaign is being run by 33 former oil lobbyists and has already received over $1 million in donations from the oil industry.  We held a rally outside the Shell Station on the corner of Delmar and Skinker, and had a great time!

You can find a really nice description of the event here.  Join me over the flip for some photos of the event…

Here are some photos from the event (thanks to Shelly for taking pictures).  You can click on the images to get a better look:



Charlie Dooley endorses Vernon (Doc) Harlan for 71st District Seat

12 Saturday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley Endorses Dr. Vernon (Doc) Harlan for Missouri House 71st District Seat

Normandy, MO – St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley has endorsed Dr. Vernon T. Harlan for the 71st District Seat in the upcoming Democratic primary on August 5th.  

Mr. Dooley, known as a leader in the St. Louis region and the Missouri Democratic Party, made it very clear in his endorsement that Dr. Harlan is the best candidate for the 71st District Seat.  “Vernon Harlan is dedicated to making the lives of working men and women, seniors and children better.  He will be an outspoken advocate for St. Louis County residents in Jefferson City.”  

Dr. Harlan thanked Mr. Dooley for his ringing endorsement.  “Charlie Dooley is well-known for his dedication to the people of the St. Louis County and true Democratic ideals.  I look forward to furthering these principles of justice, academic and economic opportunity for all our citizens, concern for those at risk in society and the vision of a better Missouri.”

The current 71st District Representative Esther Haywood will not be running for re-election due to term limits.

Mr. Dooley’s endorsement joins a long and growing list of community, union, law enforcement, political, educational and other organizations and individuals striving to improve our world.  These individuals and groups include:

Aerospace Lodge 837

Airport Township Democratic Club

Amalgamated Transit Union Division 788 (AFL-CIO)

American Federation of Teachers (AFT) – Local 3506

Communication Workers Association (CWA) – Local 6

Electrical Workers – Local 1

Gas Workers Union Local 11-6 of St. Louis

Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glassworkers – Local 513

Greater St. Louis Labor Council (AFL-CIO) – COPE

International Union of Elevators Constructors – Local 3

Junior College District (JCD/NEA)

Missouri AFL-CIO

Missouri American Federation of Teachers (AFL-CIO)

Missouri Council of School Administrators

Missouri ERA Political Action Club

Missouri Fraternal Order of Police

Missouri NEA

Missouri School Administrators Political Action Committee (MSAPAC)

Missouri State Council of Fire Fighters (MSCFF)

Missouri Women’s Leadership Coalition

Normandy Township Regular Democratic Club

North County Citizens Group

North County Labor Legislative Club

Pipefitters Local Union 533

Political Action Committee of the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce (BizPAC)

Professional Fire Fighters of Eastern Missouri (IAFF) -Local 2665

St. Louis Association of Realtors

St. Louis County Councilwoman Hazel Erby

Senator Rita H. Days (Missouri, 14th District)

Senator Timothy Green (Missouri, 13th District)

State Representative Gina Walsh (Missouri, 69th District)

University City Township Democratic Club

Dr. Vernon T. Harlan is a first time Democratic candidate for the 71at District but he is well known in education, criminal justice and civic circles as a dedicated and insightful individual who works for the betterment of society.  He has approximately 20 years combined experience in both on-the-ground law enforcement and the teaching of Criminal Justice.  His time spent in the study of inner city crime trends, along with his work on citizens’ crime commissions and advisory boards, make him well qualified to assist in the accreditation process for colleges and universities.

Dr. Harlan is in his thirteenth year as a Professor of Criminal Justice at St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, Missouri.  During this tenure, he spent two years as first Vice Chairperson, then Chairperson of the District-Wide College Academic Council.  He has completed Executive Education Programs at The Brookings Institute (U.S. National Security Policy) and at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government (Leadership in Crisis), and Harvard University School of Education.  He received his Ph.D. in Human Services from Capella University, his M.A. in Criminal Justice Administration from Boston University, and his B.A. in Criminal Justice from Michigan State University.  For the last eight years, he has been a member of the State of Missouri Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Corrections.

For more information about Dr. Harlan and his campaign please visit http://www.vernonharlan.com.

###

Four Ways to Kill the Wicked Witch of the West (of St. Louis) (Part I) (Updated)

12 Saturday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

I also attended the debate  last Monday evening (July 7)  between the democratic candidates vying for the 2nd congressional district seat now held by Republican Todd Akin, which ImaPT so ably describes in her diary posting of July 9.  Since this contest is an unusually important one, given Akin’s toxicity,  as well as one that most of those “in the know” seem to  have already conceded to the Republicans, I thought that I would offer some more details to supplement ImaPT’s excellent summary.  Since my notes were, to say the least, copious, I warn you there will be lots of literal reportage and I will be posting my transcription of the events in two parts of which this is the first.

I have to admit that when I showed up at the debate Monday night between the four Democrats , Byron DeLear, Mike Garman, William C. (Bill) Haas and David L. Pentland (a fifth, John Hogan was not present),  I was not sure what to expect.  I am happy to report that I left agreeing with ImaPT that we may be able to give Akin a fight if things go well.  

While there were few strong differences between the candidate’s approach to the issues, there were differences of emphasis.  Which given, it is very likely that preferences for one of or the other of the candidates could boil down to questions of style and presentation.

So what did their style and presentation tell me?  In thinking over their remarks , I found myself comparing them to characters in the Wizard of Oz, (over the top maybe, but not without precedent since the series has been utilized as political allegory before).  Anyway, don’t we all really just want, metaphorically at least, to kill the Wicked Witch and get back to our nurturing Aunty Em?    

Pentland would get the role of the Tin Man, a hard-headed, no-nonsense guy who values the rational, pragmatic approach–although not without heart.  Garman resembles Glinda the Good Witch of the South, replete with good intentions and ready to use his considerable magic to help fix our problems.  DeLear would definitely be a Dorothy-type character, charismatic in his ruby sneakers and looking somewhere over the rainbow, while Bill Haas is a natural for the sly and clever, but basically good-hearted Wizard who has been around Oz for a long time and likely wants a ticket out.  And, since he was a no-show, I guess Hogan gets to be the cowardly lion.  

In case you’re really slow and haven’t figured out who the Wicked Witch of the West is, ImaPT notes, “none of these guys pulled any punches when talking about Akin.”  And there is good reason for the emphasis on Akin.

Although a recent St. Louis Post-Dispatch article presented Mr. Akin as a conservative but independent soul who frequently bucks the Bush administration, it only hinted that on the rare occasions when Akin defies his leader, it is because Bush & Co have failed to completely embrace the agenda of the loony-tunes tip of the Republican rightwing that Akin represents. Akin’s raison d’etre seems to lie in promoting the agenda of extreme Christian fundamentalism. (He is most notorious in this regard for introducing the Pledge Protection Act of  2004,  legislation that would have stripped the courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to the Pledge of Allegiance–and by extension other issues involving separation of state and religion.)  Otherwise, on mundane issues that only involve the health and welfare of his constituents, he has, as ImaPT notes, voted with Bush a startling 97.5% of the time-with the disastrous results that we see all around us.

This race is all the more important because the conventional wisdom sees Akin’s seat as safe, a belief that can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.  There is a reason that, at least so far, the only Missouri House seat deemed worthy of ad campaign funds by the DCCC is Mo-09, Kenny Hulshoff’s seat.  According to one of the experts quoted by the Post-Dispatch:  

[Akin’s] absolutely fine,” said David Wasserman, of the Cook Political Report, which ranks House and Senate races. “Democrats have a weak bench in this district, and there’s really not much they can do to put this race in play.

We’ll just have to see about that.

Opening Statements

The Candidates were asked to give a 2 minute introductory statement.  I will add here that because of the strict format, I suspect that you might find much that each candidate said during the course of the evening summarized far more succinctly on their Websites–although there were some spontaneous moments.  

David L. Pentland’s theme was the need to solve the region’s economic crisis.  He is troubled by the loss of industry, such as the recent GM plant closings in Wentzville, and promised to work to retain industry in the district (although I don’t think he ever talked about how he proposed to do so–tax incentives or other preferential treatment would be a no-go for me for sure).  He identified the Science and Technology industries as the natural growth areas for the region in the future and promised to work across party lines to promote the Sci/Tech sector.  Overall, he stressed the importance of bringing jobs to the area and restoring fiscal responsibility.

Mike Garman rather elegantly illustrated his reasons for running by drawing on his personal experience with the public education system  He noted that his three children had all attended public schools, attended state colleges and gone on to success in life.  However, of his six grandchildren, three are in private schools which he believes is reflective not only of the deterioration of the public school system, but emblematic of the issues of neglect and decay that face the middle class residents of the 2nd district and which he hopes to address as a congressman.   He presented his dedication to hard work and background in health-care as well as his experience in an elected position as Vice-Chairman and 6th District Director of Saint Charles Ambulance District as reasons that he could be successful.

Rather than describing the issues or problems that led him to run for elective office, Byron DeLear spent much of his opening statement telling the audience why he is right for the job.  He described his background growing up in Town and Country and the respect for learning that he absorbed from his parents.  After working in Media and in the Communication Industry for several years, he felt a need to contribute on a wider scale–which led him to work on innovative approaches to some of the big issues.   Most notably he tackled headon a real biggie, the Palestinian/Israeli impasse, by involving groups of Palestinians and Israelis in conflict resolution groups.  The sum of these life experiences are what leads him to believe he is ready to join the effort to bring about the general philosophical shift that he thinks is needed in Washington post Bush.  

Bill Haas, whom I understand is a frequent candidate for office in the area and a familiar name to many, did not beat about the bush in telling u
s why he should be the democratic nominee.  His campaign literature boldly proclaims him to be “the Democrat with the best chance to beat Todd Akin!!”   His opening remarks consisted of the reasons why that is true:  1)  education and background (Yale and Harvard Law School; university teaching experience);  2) eight years on the St. Louis School Board; 3) best name recognition; 4) he appears more moderate than the other candidates–which presumably would be a plus in the 2nd district, as would 4) his spirituality.

UPDATE I.  A Clarification from Mike Garman re: Opening comments:

During the debate We mentioned my grandchildren.  What I thought I stated was we could afford to send them to private schools, but do not they live in excellent districts and all are receiving a quality education, but many children are not so fortunate.

Missouri presidential head to head: Research 2000 – July '08

12 Saturday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

missouri, presidential poll

Research 2000 released an 800 sample poll of “likely voters” on July 11th. The interviews were conducted from July 7th through July 10th. The margin of error is 3.5%. The poll was sponsored by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and KMOV. tiny URL

…QUESTION: If the 2008 election for President were held today, for whom would you vote for if the choice were between Barack Obama, the Democrat, and John McCain, the Republican?

OBAMA – 48%

MCCAIN – 43%

UNDECIDED – 9%

 

…QUESTION: If the 2008 election for President were held today, for whom would you vote for if the choice were between Barack Obama, the Democrat, and John McCain, the Republican?

DEMOCRATS

OBAMA – 84%

MCCAIN – 9%

UNDECIDED – 7%

REPUBLICANS

OBAMA – 8%

MCCAIN – 81%

UNDECIDED – 11%

INDEPENDENTS

OBAMA – 47%

MCCAIN – 43%

UNDECIDED – 10%

MEN

OBAMA – 44%

MCCAIN – 49%

UNDECIDED – 7%

WOMEN

OBAMA – 52%

MCCAIN – 37%

UNDECIDED – 11%

Interesting. 11% of self identified republican “likely voters” are undecided. Nothing fails like failure. There appears to be a gender gap.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Things that go “boom” in the night
  • Campaign Finance: keep it coming
  • Campaign Finance: “Welcome to the party, pal”
  • Joined at the hip
  • What a friend we have in Donald (r), and Betsy, and…

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,051,516 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...